Carotid artery intima-media thickness, distensibility and elasticity: population epidemiology and concordance in Australian children aged 11-12 years old and their parents.
children
distensibility
epidemiological studies
inheritance patterns
intima-media thickness
reference values
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 07 2019
04 07 2019
Historique:
entrez:
6
7
2019
pubmed:
6
7
2019
medline:
29
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To describe a well-established marker of cardiovascular risk, carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and related measures (artery distensibility and elasticity) in children aged 11-12 years old and mid-life adults, and examine associations within parent-child dyads. Cross-sectional study (Child Health CheckPoint), nested within a prospective cohort study, the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). Assessment centres in seven Australian major cities and eight selected regional towns, February 2015 to March 2016. Of all participating CheckPoint families (n=1874), 1489 children (50.0% girls) and 1476 parents (86.8% mothers) with carotid IMT data were included. Survey weights and methods were applied to account for LSAC's complex sample design and clustering within postcodes and strata. Ultrasound of the right carotid artery was performed using standardised protocols. Primary outcomes were mean and maximum far-wall carotid IMT, quantified using semiautomated edge detection software. Secondary outcomes were carotid artery distensibility and elasticity. Pearson's correlation coefficients and multivariable linear regression models were used to assess parent-child concordance. Random effects modelling on a subset of ultrasounds (with repeated measurements) was used to assess reliability of the child carotid IMT measure. The average mean and maximum child carotid IMT were 0.50 mm (SD 0.06) and 0.58 mm (SD 0.05), respectively. In adults, average mean and maximum carotid IMT were 0.57 mm (SD 0.07) and 0.66 mm (SD 0.10), respectively. Mother-child correlations for mean and maximum carotid IMT were 0.12 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.23) and 0.10 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.21), respectively. For carotid artery distensibility and elasticity, mother-child correlations were 0.19 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.25) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.18), respectively. There was no strong evidence of father-child correlation in any measure. We provide Australian values for carotid vascular measures and report a modest mother-child concordance. Both genetic and environmental exposures are likely to contribute to carotid IMT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31273013
pii: bmjopen-2017-020264
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020264
pmc: PMC6624035
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-33Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MW received support from Sandoz to present at a symposium outside the submitted work.
Références
Hypertension. 1999 Aug;34(2):201-6
pubmed: 10454441
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 1;151(5):478-87
pubmed: 10707916
Adv Data. 2000 Jun 8;(314):1-27
pubmed: 11183293
Circulation. 2001 Dec 11;104(24):2943-7
pubmed: 11739310
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;31(6):1117-22; author reply 1134-5
pubmed: 12540704
Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):397-401
pubmed: 12574549
Eur J Clin Invest. 2003 Dec;33(12):1075-83
pubmed: 14636290
Circulation. 2004 Mar 9;109(9):1089-94
pubmed: 14993130
Circulation. 2004 Apr 27;109(16):1981-6
pubmed: 15066949
JAMA. 2004 Jul 21;292(3):331-7
pubmed: 15265847
Heart. 2004 Nov;90(11):1286-90
pubmed: 15486123
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Nov;20(13):1355-9
pubmed: 15565200
J Intern Med. 2005 May;257(5):430-7
pubmed: 15836659
J Hypertens. 2005 Sep;23(9):1707-15
pubmed: 16093916
Circulation. 2005 Sep 6;112(10):1486-93
pubmed: 16129802
J Adolesc. 2006 Oct;29(5):709-20
pubmed: 16324738
Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):87-92
pubmed: 16339465
Atherosclerosis. 2007 Apr;191(2):403-8
pubmed: 16682042
Atherosclerosis. 2008 Apr;197(2):814-20
pubmed: 17825306
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Feb;21(2):93-111; quiz 189-90
pubmed: 18261694
Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2307-12
pubmed: 19498180
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2273-9
pubmed: 19520251
Hypertension. 2009 Nov;54(5):919-50
pubmed: 19729599
Eur J Pediatr. 2011 Jun;170(6):719-29
pubmed: 20978785
Neth Heart J. 2010 Dec;18(12):598-602
pubmed: 21301622
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Feb;220(2):387-93
pubmed: 21871623
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 23;60(17):1599-604
pubmed: 22999720
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(4):290-6
pubmed: 23128470
J Clin Ultrasound. 2013 Jul-Aug;41(6):340-6
pubmed: 23233368
Atherosclerosis. 2013 May;228(1):1-11
pubmed: 23395523
Hypertension. 2013 Sep;62(3):550-6
pubmed: 23817494
Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71
pubmed: 25530442
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 2;6(2):
pubmed: 28154165
Circulation. 2017 Jul 25;136(4):359-366
pubmed: 28592434
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;24(17):1824-1830
pubmed: 28703626
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 4;9(Suppl 3):3-22
pubmed: 31273012
Circulation. 1986 Dec;74(6):1399-406
pubmed: 3536154
Arterioscler Thromb. 1994 Feb;14(2):261-4
pubmed: 8305418
Circulation. 1993 Mar;87(3 Suppl):II56-65
pubmed: 8443925
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Feb 15;128(4):262-9
pubmed: 9471928
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):14-22
pubmed: 9878640