The TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation trial.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
entrez:
7
7
2019
pubmed:
7
7
2019
medline:
16
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
International resuscitation guidelines emphasize the importance of high quality chest compressions, including correct chest compression depth and rate and complete chest recoil. The aim of the study was to assess the role of the TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nursing students. A prospective randomized experimental study was performed among 94 first year students of nursing. On the next day, the participants were divided into 2 groups-the control group practiced chest compressions without the use of any device for half an hour, and the experimental group practiced with the use of TrueCPR. Further measurement of chest compressions was performed after a month. The chest compression rate achieved the value of 113 versus 126 (P < .001), adequate chest compression rate (%) was 86 versus 68 (P < .001), full chest release (%) 92 versus 69 (P = .001), and correct hand placement (%) 99 versus 99 (P, not significant) in TrueCPR and standard BLS groups, respectively. As for the assessment of the confidence of chest compression quality, 1 month after the training, the evaluation in the experimental group was statistically significantly higher (91 vs 71; P < .001) than in the control group. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training with the use of the TrueCPR device is associated with better resuscitation skills 1 month after the training. The participants using TrueCPR during the training achieved a better chest compression rate and depth with in international recommendations and better full chest release percentage and self-assessed confidence of chest compression quality comparing with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
International resuscitation guidelines emphasize the importance of high quality chest compressions, including correct chest compression depth and rate and complete chest recoil. The aim of the study was to assess the role of the TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nursing students.
METHODS
METHODS
A prospective randomized experimental study was performed among 94 first year students of nursing. On the next day, the participants were divided into 2 groups-the control group practiced chest compressions without the use of any device for half an hour, and the experimental group practiced with the use of TrueCPR. Further measurement of chest compressions was performed after a month.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The chest compression rate achieved the value of 113 versus 126 (P < .001), adequate chest compression rate (%) was 86 versus 68 (P < .001), full chest release (%) 92 versus 69 (P = .001), and correct hand placement (%) 99 versus 99 (P, not significant) in TrueCPR and standard BLS groups, respectively. As for the assessment of the confidence of chest compression quality, 1 month after the training, the evaluation in the experimental group was statistically significantly higher (91 vs 71; P < .001) than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training with the use of the TrueCPR device is associated with better resuscitation skills 1 month after the training. The participants using TrueCPR during the training achieved a better chest compression rate and depth with in international recommendations and better full chest release percentage and self-assessed confidence of chest compression quality comparing with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31277091
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015995
pii: 00005792-201907050-00006
pmc: PMC6635263
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15995Références
Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015;95:81–99.
Smereka J, Kasiñski M, Smereka A, et al. The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial. Kardiol Pol 2017;75:589–95.
Cheskes S, Schmicker RH, Rea T, et al. The association between AHA CPR quality guideline compliance and clinical outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2017;116:39–45.
Treptau J, Ebnet J, Akin M, et al. Angiographic detection of fatal acute aortic dissection Stanford type A under resuscitation. Cardiol J 2016;23:620–2.
Abelairas-Gómez C, Barcala-Furelos R, Szarpak Ł, et al. The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Kardiol Pol 2017;75:21–7.
Wieczorek W, Kaminska H. Impact of a corpuls CPR Mechanical Chest Compression Device on chest compression quality during extended pediatric manikin resuscitation: a randomized crossover pilot study. Disaster Emerg Med J 2017;2:58–63.
Jorge-Soto C, Abilleira-González M, Otero-Agra M, et al. Schoolteachers as candidates to be basic life support trainers: a simulation. Cardiol J 2018;Jul 16. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0073. [Epub ahead of print].
doi: 10.5603/cj.a2018.0073.
Szarpak Ł, Truszewski Z, Smereka J, et al. Does the use of a chest compression system in children improve the effectiveness of chest compressions? A randomised crossover simulation pilot study. Kardiol Pol 2016;74:1499–504.
González-Otero DM, Ruiz JM, Ruiz de Gauna S, et al. Monitoring chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: proof-of-concept of a single accelerometer-based feedback algorithm. PLoS One 2018;13:e0192810.
Ahn C, Lee J, Oh J, et al. Effectiveness of feedback with a smartwatch for high-quality chest compressions during adult cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled simulation study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0169046.
Ruiz de Gauna S, González-Otero DM, Ruiz J, et al. Feedback on the rate and depth of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using only accelerometers. PLoS One 2016;11:e0150139.
Olasveengen TM, de Caen AR, Mancini ME, et al. 2017 International Consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations summary. Circulation 2017;136:e424–40.
Szarpak L, Filipiak KJ, Ładny JR, et al. Should nurses use mechanical chest compression devices during CPR? Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:2044–5.
Chen J, Yang J, Hu F, et al. Standardised simulation-based emergency and intensive care nursing curriculum to improve nursing students’ performance during simulated resuscitation: a quasi-experimental study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2018;46:51–6.
González BS, Martínez L, Cerdà M, et al. Assessing practical skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: discrepancy between standard visual evaluation and a mechanical feedback device. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e6515.
Cortegiani A, Baldi E, Iozzo P, et al. Real-time feedback systems for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: time for a paradigm shift. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:E162–3.
González-Otero DM, Ruiz de Gauna S, Ruiz J, et al. Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction. Technol Health Care 2018;26:529–35.
Majer J, Jaguszewski MJ, Frass M, et al. Does the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices improve the quality of chest compressions performed by doctors? A prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. Cardiol J 2018;Aug 29. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0091. [Epub ahead of print].
doi: 10.5603/cj.a2018.0091.
Truszewski Z, Szarpak L, Kurowski A, et al. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:381–5.
Brown LL, Lin Y, Tofil NM, et al. Impact of a CPR feedback device on healthcare provider workload during simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2018;130:111–7.
Kurowski A, Szarpak Ł, Bogdañski Ł, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices. Kardiol Pol 2015;73:924–30.
Iskrzycki L, Smereka J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, et al. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol 2018;76:574–9.
Zapletal B, Greif R, Stumpf D, et al. Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study. Resuscitation 2014;85:560–6.
Sutton RM, Wolfe H, Nishisaki A, et al. Pushing harder, pushing faster, minimizing interruptions… but falling short of 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation targets during in-hospital pediatric and adolescent resuscitation. Resuscitation 2013;84:1680–4.
Austin AL, Spalding CN, Landa KN, et al. A randomized control trial of cardiopulmonary feedback devices and their impact on infant chest compression quality: a simulation study. Pediatr Emerg Care 2017;Oct 27. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001312. [Epub ahead of print].
doi: 10.1097/pec.0000000000001312.
Niles D, Nysaether J, Sutton R, et al. Leaning is common during in-hospital pediatric CPR, and decreased with automated corrective feedback. Resuscitation 2009;80:553–7.
Wang JC, Tsai SH, Chen YH, et al. Kinect-based real-time audiovisual feedback device improves CPR quality of lower-body-weight rescuers. Am J Emerg Med 2018;36:577–82.
Aguilar SA, Asakawa N, Saffer C, et al. Addition of audiovisual feedback during standard compressions is associated with improved ability. West J Emerg Med 2018;19:437–44.
Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. Part 7: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132(18 suppl 2):S444–64.
Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132(18 suppl 2):S315–67.
Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2015;43:840–8.
Evrin T, Bielski KT. Is there any difference between different infant chest compression methods? Disaster Emerg Med J 2017;2:173–4.
Johnson M, Peat A, Boyd L, et al. The impact of quantitative feedback on the performance of chest compression by basic life support trained clinical staff. Nurse Educ Today 2016;45:163–6.
Buléon C, Parienti JJ, Halbout L, et al. Improvement in chest compression quality using a feedback device (CPRmeter): a simulation randomized crossover study. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31:1457–61.
Beesems SG, Koster RW. Accurate feedback of chest compression depth on a manikin on a soft surface with correction for total body displacement. Resuscitation 2014;85:1439–43.
Baldi E, Cornara S, Contri E, et al. Real-time visual feedback during training improves laypersons’ CPR quality: a randomized controlled manikin study. CJEM 2017;19:480–7.
Weston BW, Jasti J, Lerner EB, et al. Does an individualized feedback mechanism improve quality of out-of-hospital CPR? Resuscitation 2017;113:96–100.
Gyllenborg T, Granfeldt A, Lippert F, et al. Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation during real-life out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2017;120:63–70.
Hsieh MJ, Chiang WC, Jan CF, et al. The effect of different retraining intervals on the skill performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in laypeople - a three-armed randomized control study. Resuscitation 2018;128:151–7.
Frass M, Robak O, Smereka J. Securing the airway patency by firefighters with the use of CombiTube. A pilot data. Disaster Emerg Med J 2018;3:46–50.
Majer J, Madziala A, Dabrowska A, et al. The place of TrueCPR feedback device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Should we use it? A randomized pilot study. Disaster Emerg Med J 2018;3:131–6.