Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: A mixed-methods study.

Palliative care clinical ethics communication end-of-life decisions family-centered care mixed-method research parental perspectives personalized decision-making thematic analysis trisomy 13 trisomy 18

Journal

Palliative medicine
ISSN: 1477-030X
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 10 7 2019
medline: 2 3 2021
entrez: 9 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 are common life-limiting conditions associated with major disabilities. Many parents have described conflictual relationships with clinicians, but positive and adverse experiences of families with healthcare providers have not been well described. (1) To investigate parental experiences with clinicians and (2) to provide practical recommendations and behaviors clinicians could emulate to avoid conflict. Participants were asked to describe their best and worse experiences, as well as supportive clinicians they met. The results were analyzed using mixed methods. Parents of children with trisomy 13 and 18 who were part of online social support networks. A total of 503 invitations were sent, and 332 parents completed the questionnaire about 272 children. The majority of parents (72%) had met a supportive clinician. When describing clinicians who changed their lives, the overarching theme, present in 88% of answers, was trust. Parents trusted clinicians when they felt he or she cared and valued their child, their family, and made them feel like good parents (69%), had appropriate knowledge (66%), and supported them and gave them realistic hope (42%). Many (42%) parents did not want to make-or be part of-life-and-death decisions. Parents gave specific examples of supportive behaviors that can be adopted by clinicians. Parents also described adverse experiences, generally leading to conflicts and lack of trust. Realistic and compassionate support of parents living with children with trisomy 13 and 18 is possible. Adversarial interactions that lead to distrust and conflicts can be avoided. Many supportive behaviors that inspire trust can be emulated.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 are common life-limiting conditions associated with major disabilities. Many parents have described conflictual relationships with clinicians, but positive and adverse experiences of families with healthcare providers have not been well described.
AIM
(1) To investigate parental experiences with clinicians and (2) to provide practical recommendations and behaviors clinicians could emulate to avoid conflict.
DESIGN
Participants were asked to describe their best and worse experiences, as well as supportive clinicians they met. The results were analyzed using mixed methods.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS
Parents of children with trisomy 13 and 18 who were part of online social support networks. A total of 503 invitations were sent, and 332 parents completed the questionnaire about 272 children.
RESULTS
The majority of parents (72%) had met a supportive clinician. When describing clinicians who changed their lives, the overarching theme, present in 88% of answers, was trust. Parents trusted clinicians when they felt he or she cared and valued their child, their family, and made them feel like good parents (69%), had appropriate knowledge (66%), and supported them and gave them realistic hope (42%). Many (42%) parents did not want to make-or be part of-life-and-death decisions. Parents gave specific examples of supportive behaviors that can be adopted by clinicians. Parents also described adverse experiences, generally leading to conflicts and lack of trust.
CONCLUSION
Realistic and compassionate support of parents living with children with trisomy 13 and 18 is possible. Adversarial interactions that lead to distrust and conflicts can be avoided. Many supportive behaviors that inspire trust can be emulated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31280664
doi: 10.1177/0269216319860662
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

262-271

Auteurs

Annie Janvier (A)

Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Neonatology, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Clinical Ethics Unit and Palliative Care Unit, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Unité de Recherche en Éthique Clinique et Partenariat Famille, Centre de Recherche, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Barbara Farlow (B)

The deVeber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research, North York, ON, Canada.
Patients for Patient Safety Canada, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Keith J Barrington (KJ)

Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Neonatology, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Claude Julie Bourque (CJ)

Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Unité de Recherche en Éthique Clinique et Partenariat Famille, Centre de Recherche, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Tracy Brazg (T)

Ethics Consultation Service, University of Washington Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Benjamin Wilfond (B)

Truman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH