Is male gender a prognostic factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip? Mid-long-term results of posteromedial limited surgery.
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Dislocation, Congenital
/ diagnosis
Humans
Infant
Male
Osteonecrosis
/ diagnosis
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnosis
Postoperative Period
Prognosis
Radiography
/ methods
Recovery of Function
Reoperation
/ methods
Risk Assessment
Sex Factors
Treatment Outcome
Developmental dysplasia of the hip
Male sex
Osteonecrosis
Posteromedial limited approach
Residual acetabular dysplasia
Journal
Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica
ISSN: 2589-1294
Titre abrégé: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 9424806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
09
01
2019
revised:
17
04
2019
accepted:
24
05
2019
pubmed:
10
7
2019
medline:
1
2
2020
entrez:
9
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to determine if male sex is a poor prognostic factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and to determine the mid-long-term radiological and clinical results of male patients in comparison with female patients following an open reduction with posteromedial limited approach. We examined 54 hips of 41 male patients (12.38 ± 4.82 months) and 96 hips of 82 female patients (11.11 ± 4.93 months) with DDH. All the patients underwent open reduction with posteromedial limited approach. The average follow-up time was 108 months for the male patients and 110 months for the female patients. The Tönnis grade, acetabular index, Kalamchi and MacEwen classification, and Severin classifications were determined for all patients. The Mc Kay classification system was used to evaluate the functional results. From the total, 25 (60%) male and 70 (85%) female patients had satisfactory radiographic outcomes (Severin Ia, Ib, or II) according to the Severin classification. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the Severin classification (P = 0.04). Residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) was observed in 12 (15%) female and 17 (41%) male patients (P = 0.001). Grade 2 or higher osteonecrosis was observed in 7 (9%) patients in female and 6 (15%) patients in male group. The clinical outcomes in terms of the Mc Kay classification showed satisfactory outcomes in 72 (87%) female and 34 (82%) male patients. Further, 8 (9.7%) female patients and 6 (14.6%) male patients underwent a second operation. However, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative osteonecrosis presence (P = 0.982), functional outcomes (P = 0.571), and secondary operation rates (P = 0.298). Male sex was associated with poor outcomes in terms of the Severin classification (P = 0.04) and RAD (P = 0.001). Although our results indicated that male sex is a poor prognostic factor for radiological results and RAD, there was no difference between male and female patients in terms of osteonecrosis, redislocations, and functional outcomes. Secondary surgical interventions should not be delayed in the absence of the spontaneous development of acetabulum. Level III, prognostic study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31281079
pii: S1017-995X(19)30024-0
doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.05.001
pmc: PMC6819831
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
340-345Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:531-42
pubmed: 15116642
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116(6-7):345-7
pubmed: 9266038
Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Dec;82(4):787-796
pubmed: 29182120
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 19;95(12):1081-6
pubmed: 23783204
Int Orthop. 2018 Jan;42(1):175-182
pubmed: 29130113
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):11-54
pubmed: 23878122
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Jul;60(5):586-99
pubmed: 681377
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Sep;98 Suppl 8:S32-7
pubmed: 26529812
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):358-65
pubmed: 11716407
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2658-69
pubmed: 25828941
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):697-701
pubmed: 28455481
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jan;68(1):79-87
pubmed: 3941122
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016 Nov;25(6):504-8
pubmed: 27379670
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Apr-May;29(3):224-30
pubmed: 19305270
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Apr;466(4):847-55
pubmed: 18288554
J Int Med Res. 2017 Feb;45(1):272-281
pubmed: 28222640
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Mar;80(3):336-44
pubmed: 9531200