T vector velocity: A new ECG biomarker for identifying drug effects on cardiac ventricular repolarization.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 03 09 2018
accepted: 04 06 2019
entrez: 9 7 2019
pubmed: 10 7 2019
medline: 19 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We present a new family of ECG biomarkers for assessing drug effects on ventricular repolarization. We show that drugs blocking inward (depolarizing) ion currents cause a relative increase of the T vector velocity (TVV) and accelerate repolarization, while drugs blocking outward ion currents cause a relative decrease of the TVV and delay repolarization. The results suggest a link between the TVV and the instantaneous change of the cellular action potentials that may contribute to bridge the gap between the surface ECG and myocardial cellular processes. We measure TVV as the time required to reach X% of the total Trajectory length of the T vector loop, denoted as TrX. Applied to data from two FDA funded studies (22+22 subjects, 5232+4208 ECGs) which target ECG effects of various ion-channel blocking drugs, the TrX effect profiles indicate increasingly delayed electrical activity over the entire repolarization process for drugs solely reducing outward potassium current (dofetilide, moxifloxacin). For drugs eliciting block of the inward sodium or calcium currents (mexiletine, lidocaine), the TrX effect profiles were consistent with accelerated electrical activity in the initial repolarization phase. For multichannel blocking drugs (ranolazine) or drug combinations blocking multiple ion currents (dofetilide + mexiletine, dofetilide + lidocaine), the overall TrX effect profiles indicate a superposition of the individual TrX effect profiles. The parameter Tr40c differentiates pure potassium channel blocking drugs from multichannel blocking drugs with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.90, CI = [0.88 to 0.92]. This is significantly better than the performance of J-Tpeakc (0.81, CI = [0.78 to 0.84]) identified as the best parameter in the second FDA study. Combining the ten parameters Tr10c to Tr100c in a logistic regression model further improved the AUC to 0.94, CI = [0.92 to 0.96]. TVV analysis substantially improves assessment of drug effects on cardiac repolarization, providing a plausible and improved mechanistic link between drug effects on ionic currents and overall ventricular repolarization reflected in the body surface ECG. TVV contributes to an enhanced appraisal of the proarrhythmic risk of drugs beyond QTc prolongation and J-Tpeakc.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
We present a new family of ECG biomarkers for assessing drug effects on ventricular repolarization. We show that drugs blocking inward (depolarizing) ion currents cause a relative increase of the T vector velocity (TVV) and accelerate repolarization, while drugs blocking outward ion currents cause a relative decrease of the TVV and delay repolarization. The results suggest a link between the TVV and the instantaneous change of the cellular action potentials that may contribute to bridge the gap between the surface ECG and myocardial cellular processes.
METHODS
We measure TVV as the time required to reach X% of the total Trajectory length of the T vector loop, denoted as TrX. Applied to data from two FDA funded studies (22+22 subjects, 5232+4208 ECGs) which target ECG effects of various ion-channel blocking drugs, the TrX effect profiles indicate increasingly delayed electrical activity over the entire repolarization process for drugs solely reducing outward potassium current (dofetilide, moxifloxacin). For drugs eliciting block of the inward sodium or calcium currents (mexiletine, lidocaine), the TrX effect profiles were consistent with accelerated electrical activity in the initial repolarization phase. For multichannel blocking drugs (ranolazine) or drug combinations blocking multiple ion currents (dofetilide + mexiletine, dofetilide + lidocaine), the overall TrX effect profiles indicate a superposition of the individual TrX effect profiles.
RESULTS
The parameter Tr40c differentiates pure potassium channel blocking drugs from multichannel blocking drugs with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.90, CI = [0.88 to 0.92]. This is significantly better than the performance of J-Tpeakc (0.81, CI = [0.78 to 0.84]) identified as the best parameter in the second FDA study. Combining the ten parameters Tr10c to Tr100c in a logistic regression model further improved the AUC to 0.94, CI = [0.92 to 0.96].
CONCLUSIONS
TVV analysis substantially improves assessment of drug effects on cardiac repolarization, providing a plausible and improved mechanistic link between drug effects on ionic currents and overall ventricular repolarization reflected in the body surface ECG. TVV contributes to an enhanced appraisal of the proarrhythmic risk of drugs beyond QTc prolongation and J-Tpeakc.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31283756
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204712
pii: PONE-D-18-25156
pmc: PMC6613676
doi:

Substances chimiques

Phenethylamines 0
Potassium Channel Blockers 0
Sodium Channel Blockers 0
Sulfonamides 0
Mexiletine 1U511HHV4Z
Lidocaine 98PI200987
Ranolazine A6IEZ5M406
Verapamil CJ0O37KU29
dofetilide R4Z9X1N2ND

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0204712

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

W declare the following competing interests statements: Authors WB CM are consultants for AbbVie, Inc. and authors GG DB KK PW DC are employees of AbbVie Inc. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

Heart Rhythm. 2006 Sep;3(9):1092-9
pubmed: 16945809
Circulation. 2000 Jun 13;101(23):E215-20
pubmed: 10851218
Clin Drug Investig. 2015 Nov;35(11):717-24
pubmed: 26410545
Comput Biomed Res. 1977 Oct;10(5):459-70
pubmed: 923219
J Electrocardiol. 2017 Nov - Dec;50(6):748-751
pubmed: 28942950
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0163619
pubmed: 28036334
J Electrocardiol. 2017 Nov - Dec;50(6):752-757
pubmed: 28826858
Drug Saf. 2009;32(7):613-7
pubmed: 19530747
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016 Sep-Oct;81:15-20
pubmed: 27282641
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Apr;105(4):943-953
pubmed: 30447156
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 May;7(5):e1002061
pubmed: 21637795
Clin Cardiol. 1980 Apr;3(2):87-95
pubmed: 6993081
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;96(5):549-58
pubmed: 25054430
J Electrocardiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;41(6):567-74
pubmed: 18790499
Am Heart J. 2014 Mar;167(3):292-300
pubmed: 24576511
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2565-8
pubmed: 21096447
Drug Saf. 2009;32(7):599-611
pubmed: 19530746
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2018 Sep - Oct;93:75-79
pubmed: 29879475
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Apr 13;4(4):
pubmed: 25870186
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2003 Oct;8(4):343-51
pubmed: 14516292
Fed Regist. 2005 Oct 20;70(202):61134-5
pubmed: 16237860
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999 Sep;37(5):574-84
pubmed: 10723894
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Feb;99(2):214-23
pubmed: 26259627
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Apr 13;367(1892):1283-99
pubmed: 19324709
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;103(1):54-66
pubmed: 28986934
Drug Saf. 2008;31(3):249-60
pubmed: 18302449

Auteurs

Werner Bystricky (W)

Clinical Pharmacology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Christoph Maier (C)

Clinical Pharmacology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Department of Medical Informatics, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Germany.

Gary Gintant (G)

Integrated Sciences and Technology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Dennis Bergau (D)

Clinical Pharmacology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Kent Kamradt (K)

Clinical Pharmacology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Patrick Welsh (P)

Clinical Pharmacology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

David Carter (D)

Clinical Pharmacology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH