The Relationship between Electrical Stapedius Reflex Thresholds and Behaviorally Most Comfortable Levels in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.
Adult
Auditory Threshold
/ physiology
Case-Control Studies
Cochlear Implantation
/ methods
Cochlear Implants
/ adverse effects
Deafness
/ rehabilitation
Electric Stimulation
/ methods
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
/ physiology
Humans
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reflex
/ physiology
Speech Perception
Stapedius
/ physiology
Journal
The journal of international advanced otology
ISSN: 2148-3817
Titre abrégé: J Int Adv Otol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101522982
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
10
7
2019
medline:
11
2
2021
entrez:
10
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Programming the cochlear implant's speech processor with subjective methods in young, uncooperative children is difficult. Since young children cannot provide adequate feedback to the clinician, objective methods which do not require patient's response were often used. Electrical Stapedius Reflex Test is one of the most common procedures used. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between electricalstapedius reflex thresholds and behaviorally most comfortable levels in experienced cochlear implant users. The patients implanted with two brands of cochlear implants were compared in terms of electrical stapedius reflex thresholds versus most comfortable levels. Speech tests results were also compared between the two groups. 46 cochlear implanted patients who had at least 1 year of cochlear implant experience were included in the study. 28 patients were implanted with Nucleus, 18 patients with Med-El devices. Moderate correlations were obtained between Electrical Stapedius Reflex (ESR) thresholds and C levels in Nucleus users; higher correlations were obtained for Med-El patients. ESR thresholds were present at higher levels than MCL/C levels in both Nucleus and Med-El users. No significant difference was obtained between the two groups in terms of speech tests. ESR test can be very informative for programming young and uncooperative patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31287433
doi: 10.5152/iao.2019.6589
pmc: PMC7224436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8-12Références
Cochlear Implants Int. 2004 Mar;5(1):28-37
pubmed: 18792192
Cochlear Implants Int. 2014 May;15(3):145-60
pubmed: 24606544
Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Jun;11 Suppl 1:482-4
pubmed: 21756678
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:175-6
pubmed: 7668623
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Aug;127(8):963-6
pubmed: 11493206
Audiology. 2000 Jan-Feb;39(1):13-8
pubmed: 10749066
Ear Hear. 1990 Oct;11(5):370-4
pubmed: 2262087
Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S107-8
pubmed: 9391620
Ear Hear. 1994 Apr;15(2):184-92
pubmed: 8020651
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Oct;30(7):908-15
pubmed: 19730148
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 1):255-61
pubmed: 9334774
Cochlear Implants Int. 2006 Sep;7(3):125-41
pubmed: 18792380
Scand Audiol. 1990;19(2):111-5
pubmed: 2371534
Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Jun;11 Suppl 1:485-8
pubmed: 21756679
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999 Apr;177:64-8
pubmed: 10214804
Ear Hear. 1988 Feb;9(1):4-8
pubmed: 3342943