The Relationship between Electrical Stapedius Reflex Thresholds and Behaviorally Most Comfortable Levels in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.


Journal

The journal of international advanced otology
ISSN: 2148-3817
Titre abrégé: J Int Adv Otol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101522982

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 10 7 2019
medline: 11 2 2021
entrez: 10 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Programming the cochlear implant's speech processor with subjective methods in young, uncooperative children is difficult. Since young children cannot provide adequate feedback to the clinician, objective methods which do not require patient's response were often used. Electrical Stapedius Reflex Test is one of the most common procedures used. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between electricalstapedius reflex thresholds and behaviorally most comfortable levels in experienced cochlear implant users. The patients implanted with two brands of cochlear implants were compared in terms of electrical stapedius reflex thresholds versus most comfortable levels. Speech tests results were also compared between the two groups. 46 cochlear implanted patients who had at least 1 year of cochlear implant experience were included in the study. 28 patients were implanted with Nucleus, 18 patients with Med-El devices. Moderate correlations were obtained between Electrical Stapedius Reflex (ESR) thresholds and C levels in Nucleus users; higher correlations were obtained for Med-El patients. ESR thresholds were present at higher levels than MCL/C levels in both Nucleus and Med-El users. No significant difference was obtained between the two groups in terms of speech tests. ESR test can be very informative for programming young and uncooperative patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31287433
doi: 10.5152/iao.2019.6589
pmc: PMC7224436
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8-12

Références

Cochlear Implants Int. 2004 Mar;5(1):28-37
pubmed: 18792192
Cochlear Implants Int. 2014 May;15(3):145-60
pubmed: 24606544
Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Jun;11 Suppl 1:482-4
pubmed: 21756678
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:175-6
pubmed: 7668623
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Aug;127(8):963-6
pubmed: 11493206
Audiology. 2000 Jan-Feb;39(1):13-8
pubmed: 10749066
Ear Hear. 1990 Oct;11(5):370-4
pubmed: 2262087
Am J Otol. 1997 Nov;18(6 Suppl):S107-8
pubmed: 9391620
Ear Hear. 1994 Apr;15(2):184-92
pubmed: 8020651
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Oct;30(7):908-15
pubmed: 19730148
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 1):255-61
pubmed: 9334774
Cochlear Implants Int. 2006 Sep;7(3):125-41
pubmed: 18792380
Scand Audiol. 1990;19(2):111-5
pubmed: 2371534
Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Jun;11 Suppl 1:485-8
pubmed: 21756679
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999 Apr;177:64-8
pubmed: 10214804
Ear Hear. 1988 Feb;9(1):4-8
pubmed: 3342943

Auteurs

Ayça Çiprut (A)

Department of Audiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

Çağlayan Adıgül (Ç)

Department of Audiology, Sakarya University School of Health, Sakarya, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH