[Evaluation of the Influence of the Experience and Training of EBUS-TBNA on Diagnostic Rate and Safety].
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bronchoscopy
/ education
Clinical Competence
Education, Medical
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
/ methods
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Educational
Patient Safety
Physicians
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
bronchoscopy
endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration
lung cancer
simulator
training
Journal
Journal of UOEH
ISSN: 0387-821X
Titre abrégé: J UOEH
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 7909645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
12
7
2019
pubmed:
12
7
2019
medline:
25
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been widely used in Japan. The guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians has recommended that EBUS-TBNA should be performed by well-trained operators who can perform highly accurate procedures, but the indicators of the degree of experience and training are unclear. In our department, physicians who do not have enough experience perform EBUS-TBNA under the supervision of bronchoscopic instructors who have EBUS-TBNA techniques (Board Certified Member of the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy) after guidance and training in EBUS-TBNA using a simulator as an operator and helper. In order to evaluate the influence of the experience and training of EBUS-TBNA on diagnostic accuracy and safety, we retrospectively compared the diagnostic accuracy and safety of EBUS-TBNA performed by physicians within one year of experience of EBUS-TBNA and those performed by physicians with more than one year of experience. A total of 111 cases (148 lesions) who were eventually diagnosed as having primary lung cancer and underwent EBUS-TBNA in our department between April 2014 and January 2016 were divided into two groups. Group A (43 cases, 57 lesions) was examined by third-year doctors within one year of experience of EBUS-TBNA, and group B (68 cases, 91 lesions) was examined by doctors with four or more years of experience and with more than one year of experience of EBUS-TBNA. Diagnostic rate, examination time, and complications were evaluated. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the diagnostic rate (A, 89.5% vs. B, 90.1%, P = 1.0) or examination time (A, 27 min vs. B, 23 min, P = 0.149), and no complications were observed in either group. This study suggests that even less-experienced physicians may safely perform EBUS-TBNA as well as moderately-experienced physicians with more than 1 year experience of EBUS-TBNA with similar diagnostic rates when proper training and supervision are supplied.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31292362
doi: 10.7888/juoeh.41.179
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
jpn
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM