The midwifery-led care model: a continuity of care model in the birth path.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 07 2019
08 07 2019
Historique:
received:
24
06
2019
accepted:
01
07
2019
entrez:
12
7
2019
pubmed:
12
7
2019
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The birth path is affected by a fragmentation in the patient care process, creating a discontinuity of this last one. The pregnant woman has to interface with many professionals, both during the pregnancy, the childbirth and the puerperium. However, during the last ten years, there has been an increasing of the pregnancy care operated by the midwife, who is considered to be the operator with the right competences, who can take care of every pregnancy and may avail herself of other professionals' contributions in order to improve the outcomes of maternal and neonatal health. To verify whether there are proofs of effectiveness that support the caseload midwifery care model, and if it is possible to apply this model in the birth path in Italy. A revision of literature has been done using some search engine (Google, Bing) and specific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Home - ClinicalTrials.gov). There has also been a consultation of the Italian regulations, the national guidelines and the recommendations of WHO. The search string, properly adapted to the three databases, has given the following results: MEDLINE 64 articles, CINAHL 94 articles, Embase 88 articles. From this selection, 14 articles have been extracted: 1 systematic review, 3 controlled random trial, 7 observational studies, 3 qualitative studies. The caseload midwifery care seems to be an effective and reliable organisational/caring method. It responds to the criterions of quality and security, to the needs of women not only during the pregnancy but also during the post-partum phase. For these reasons, it seems very useful also for the birth path in the Italian reality.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY
The birth path is affected by a fragmentation in the patient care process, creating a discontinuity of this last one. The pregnant woman has to interface with many professionals, both during the pregnancy, the childbirth and the puerperium. However, during the last ten years, there has been an increasing of the pregnancy care operated by the midwife, who is considered to be the operator with the right competences, who can take care of every pregnancy and may avail herself of other professionals' contributions in order to improve the outcomes of maternal and neonatal health.
AIM
To verify whether there are proofs of effectiveness that support the caseload midwifery care model, and if it is possible to apply this model in the birth path in Italy.
METHODS
A revision of literature has been done using some search engine (Google, Bing) and specific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Home - ClinicalTrials.gov). There has also been a consultation of the Italian regulations, the national guidelines and the recommendations of WHO.
RESULTS
The search string, properly adapted to the three databases, has given the following results: MEDLINE 64 articles, CINAHL 94 articles, Embase 88 articles. From this selection, 14 articles have been extracted: 1 systematic review, 3 controlled random trial, 7 observational studies, 3 qualitative studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The caseload midwifery care seems to be an effective and reliable organisational/caring method. It responds to the criterions of quality and security, to the needs of women not only during the pregnancy but also during the post-partum phase. For these reasons, it seems very useful also for the birth path in the Italian reality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31292414
doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i6-S.8621
pmc: PMC6776178
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41-52Références
BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):465-74
pubmed: 26498455
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 19;16(1):168
pubmed: 27430506
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):533-539
pubmed: 30240045
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Feb 03;16:28
pubmed: 26841782
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 May;24:106-111
pubmed: 26830916
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2017 Mar;11:102-106
pubmed: 28159119
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 26;16(1):188
pubmed: 27459967
Midwifery. 2019 Mar;70:15-21
pubmed: 30530209
Women Birth. 2016 Jun;29(3):223-33
pubmed: 26631349
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:148-156
pubmed: 28458123
Midwifery. 2016 May;36:61-9
pubmed: 27106945
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):29
pubmed: 30642287
Midwifery. 2018 May;60:1-8
pubmed: 29454244
Women Birth. 2016 Jun;29(3):214-22
pubmed: 26603016
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4:CD004667
pubmed: 27121907
BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21
pubmed: 14630762
Midwifery. 2018 Oct;65:26-34
pubmed: 30032066
Women Birth. 2017 Feb;30(1):e61-e69
pubmed: 27665216
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):164
pubmed: 28576137
PLoS Med. 2016 Sep 27;13(9):e1002134
pubmed: 27676611
Midwifery. 2019 Feb;69:10-16
pubmed: 30390462
Midwifery. 2016 Jun;37:9-18
pubmed: 27217232
Women Birth. 2018 Jun;31(3):194-201
pubmed: 28964707