Does Early Follow-Up Improve the Outcomes of Sepsis Survivors Discharged to Home Health Care?


Journal

Medical care
ISSN: 1537-1948
Titre abrégé: Med Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0230027

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
entrez: 12 7 2019
pubmed: 12 7 2019
medline: 13 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is little evidence to guide the care of over a million sepsis survivors following hospital discharge despite high rates of hospital readmission. We examined whether early home health nursing (first visit within 2 days of hospital discharge and at least 1 additional visit in the first posthospital week) and early physician follow-up (an outpatient visit in the first posthospital week) reduce 30-day readmissions among Medicare sepsis survivors. A pragmatic, comparative effectiveness analysis of Medicare data from 2013 to 2014 using nonlinear instrumental variable analysis. Medicare beneficiaries in the 50 states and District of Columbia discharged alive after a sepsis hospitalization and received home health care. The outcomes, protocol parameters, and control variables were from Medicare administrative and claim files and the home health Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmission. Our sample consisted of 170,571 mostly non-Hispanic white (82.3%), female (57.5%), older adults (mean age, 76 y) with severe sepsis (86.9%) and a multitude of comorbid conditions and functional limitations. Among them, 44.7% received only the nursing protocol, 11.0% only the medical doctor protocol, 28.1% both protocols, and 16.2% neither. Although neither protocol by itself had a statistically significant effect on readmission, both together reduced the probability of 30-day all-cause readmission by 7 percentage points (P=0.006; 95% confidence interval=2, 12). Our findings suggest that, together, early postdischarge care by home health and medical providers can reduce hospital readmissions for sepsis survivors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is little evidence to guide the care of over a million sepsis survivors following hospital discharge despite high rates of hospital readmission.
OBJECTIVE
We examined whether early home health nursing (first visit within 2 days of hospital discharge and at least 1 additional visit in the first posthospital week) and early physician follow-up (an outpatient visit in the first posthospital week) reduce 30-day readmissions among Medicare sepsis survivors.
DESIGN
A pragmatic, comparative effectiveness analysis of Medicare data from 2013 to 2014 using nonlinear instrumental variable analysis.
SUBJECTS
Medicare beneficiaries in the 50 states and District of Columbia discharged alive after a sepsis hospitalization and received home health care.
MEASURES
The outcomes, protocol parameters, and control variables were from Medicare administrative and claim files and the home health Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmission.
RESULTS
Our sample consisted of 170,571 mostly non-Hispanic white (82.3%), female (57.5%), older adults (mean age, 76 y) with severe sepsis (86.9%) and a multitude of comorbid conditions and functional limitations. Among them, 44.7% received only the nursing protocol, 11.0% only the medical doctor protocol, 28.1% both protocols, and 16.2% neither. Although neither protocol by itself had a statistically significant effect on readmission, both together reduced the probability of 30-day all-cause readmission by 7 percentage points (P=0.006; 95% confidence interval=2, 12).
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that, together, early postdischarge care by home health and medical providers can reduce hospital readmissions for sepsis survivors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31295191
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001152
pii: 00005650-201908000-00009
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

633-640

Auteurs

Partha Deb (P)

Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY) and National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

Christopher M Murtaugh (CM)

Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.

Kathryn H Bowles (KH)

Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.

Mark E Mikkelsen (ME)

Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Hoda Nouri Khajavi (HN)

Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY.

Stanley Moore (S)

Independent Contractor, Bonny Doon, California.

Yolanda Barrón (Y)

Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.

Penny H Feldman (PH)

Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH