Tumor mutation burden and circulating tumor DNA in combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody therapy in metastatic melanoma - results of a prospective biomarker study.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
CTLA-4 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Circulating Tumor DNA
Female
Humans
Ipilimumab
/ therapeutic use
Male
Melanoma
/ drug therapy
Middle Aged
Mutation
Nivolumab
/ therapeutic use
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Young Adult
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 07 2019
12 07 2019
Historique:
received:
08
02
2019
accepted:
27
06
2019
entrez:
14
7
2019
pubmed:
14
7
2019
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Metastasized or unresectable melanoma has been the first malignant tumor to be successfully treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Nevertheless, about 40-50% of the patients do not respond to these treatments and severe side effects are observed in up to 60%. Therefore, there is a high need to identify reliable biomarkers predicting response. Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) is a debated predictor for response to checkpoint inhibitors and early measurement of ctDNA can help to detect treatment failure to immunotherapy in selected melanoma patients. However, it has not yet been clarified how TMB and ctDNA can be used to estimate response to combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody therapy in metastatic melanoma. In this prospective biomarker study, we included 35 melanoma patients with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) therapy. In all patients, a tumor panel of 710 tumor-associated genes was applied (tumor vs. reference tissue comparison), followed by repetitive liquid biopsies. Cell-free DNA was extracted and at least one driver mutation was monitored. Treatment response was evaluated after about three months of therapy. TMB was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders and TMB > 23.1 Mut/Mb (TMB-high) was associated with a survival benefit compared to TMB ≤ 23.1 Mut/Mb (TMB-low or TMB-intermediate). Furthermore, a > 50% decrease of cell-free DNA concentration or undetectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), measured by tumor-specific variant copies/ml of plasma at first follow-up three weeks after treatment initiation were significantly associated with response to combined immunotherapy and improved overall survival, respectively. It is noticeable that no patient with TMB ≤ 23.1 Mut/Mb and detectable or increasing ctDNA at first follow-up responded to immunotherapy. High TMB, > 50% decrease of cell-free DNA concentration, and undetectable ctDNA at first follow-up seem to be associated with response and overall survival under combined immunotherapy. The evaluation of ctDNA and cell-free DNA three weeks after treatment initiation may be suitable for early assessment of efficacy of immunotherapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Metastasized or unresectable melanoma has been the first malignant tumor to be successfully treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Nevertheless, about 40-50% of the patients do not respond to these treatments and severe side effects are observed in up to 60%. Therefore, there is a high need to identify reliable biomarkers predicting response. Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) is a debated predictor for response to checkpoint inhibitors and early measurement of ctDNA can help to detect treatment failure to immunotherapy in selected melanoma patients. However, it has not yet been clarified how TMB and ctDNA can be used to estimate response to combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibody therapy in metastatic melanoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In this prospective biomarker study, we included 35 melanoma patients with ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) therapy. In all patients, a tumor panel of 710 tumor-associated genes was applied (tumor vs. reference tissue comparison), followed by repetitive liquid biopsies. Cell-free DNA was extracted and at least one driver mutation was monitored. Treatment response was evaluated after about three months of therapy.
RESULTS
TMB was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders and TMB > 23.1 Mut/Mb (TMB-high) was associated with a survival benefit compared to TMB ≤ 23.1 Mut/Mb (TMB-low or TMB-intermediate). Furthermore, a > 50% decrease of cell-free DNA concentration or undetectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), measured by tumor-specific variant copies/ml of plasma at first follow-up three weeks after treatment initiation were significantly associated with response to combined immunotherapy and improved overall survival, respectively. It is noticeable that no patient with TMB ≤ 23.1 Mut/Mb and detectable or increasing ctDNA at first follow-up responded to immunotherapy.
CONCLUSION
High TMB, > 50% decrease of cell-free DNA concentration, and undetectable ctDNA at first follow-up seem to be associated with response and overall survival under combined immunotherapy. The evaluation of ctDNA and cell-free DNA three weeks after treatment initiation may be suitable for early assessment of efficacy of immunotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31300034
doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0659-0
pii: 10.1186/s40425-019-0659-0
pmc: PMC6625062
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CTLA-4 Antigen
0
CTLA4 protein, human
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Ipilimumab
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
180Références
Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006
pubmed: 12045153
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Nature. 2012 Feb 08;482(7385):400-4
pubmed: 22318521
Clin Chem. 2013 Jun;59(6):892-902
pubmed: 23570709
J Pathol. 2013 Jul;230(3):261-9
pubmed: 23620124
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):415-21
pubmed: 23945592
Int J Cancer. 2014 Dec 15;135(12):2984-91
pubmed: 24798213
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014 Sep;27(5):835-8
pubmed: 24913711
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199
pubmed: 25409260
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71
pubmed: 25428505
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2015 May;28(3):245-53
pubmed: 25477049
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84
pubmed: 25795410
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Aug 20;107(11):
pubmed: 26296643
Science. 2015 Oct 9;350(6257):207-211
pubmed: 26359337
Cell. 2016 Mar 24;165(1):35-44
pubmed: 26997480
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 19;7(16):22857-64
pubmed: 27009843
Int Immunol. 2016 Aug;28(8):411-9
pubmed: 27048318
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1600-9
pubmed: 27092830
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Nov;4(11):959-967
pubmed: 27671167
Cancer Discov. 2017 Feb;7(2):188-201
pubmed: 27903500
Anal Chem. 2017 Feb 7;89(3):1724-1733
pubmed: 27935690
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Mar 1;9(379):
pubmed: 28251903
Br J Cancer. 2017 Apr 25;116(9):1141-1147
pubmed: 28324889
Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):1130-1136
pubmed: 28327969
Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 May;5(5):417-424
pubmed: 28411193
Genome Med. 2017 Apr 19;9(1):34
pubmed: 28420421
Nature. 2017 May 11;545(7653):175-180
pubmed: 28467829
Nat Med. 2017 Jun;23(6):703-713
pubmed: 28481359
Acta Derm Venereol. 2017 Nov 15;97(10):1212-1218
pubmed: 28681063
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2018 Jan;31(1):73-81
pubmed: 28786531
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jan;45(1):95-101
pubmed: 28831583
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Nov;16(11):2598-2608
pubmed: 28835386
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2018 May;31(3):404-410
pubmed: 29171176
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 15;24(20):4960-4967
pubmed: 29685882
Cancer Cell. 2018 May 14;33(5):853-861.e4
pubmed: 29731394
NPJ Genom Med. 2018 Apr 30;3:12
pubmed: 29736260
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 May 9;6(1):32
pubmed: 29743104
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jun;19(6):737-746
pubmed: 29778737
Oncotarget. 2018 May 18;9(38):25265-25276
pubmed: 29861869
Mol Oncol. 2018 Oct;12(10):1661-1672
pubmed: 30113761
Int J Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;144(4):848-858
pubmed: 30238975
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492
pubmed: 30361170
Cell Rep. 2018 Nov 6;25(6):1446-1457
pubmed: 30404001
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):202-206
pubmed: 30643254
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
pubmed: 9254694