Targeted Intervention to Improve the Quality of Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning in the Netherlands: Short and Long-Term Impact.
Benchmarking
/ methods
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Netherlands
Organ Sparing Treatments
/ methods
Organs at Risk
/ diagnostic imaging
Parotid Gland
/ diagnostic imaging
Pharyngeal Muscles
/ diagnostic imaging
Quality Improvement
Radiation Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ methods
Submandibular Gland
/ diagnostic imaging
Time Factors
Tongue
/ diagnostic imaging
Tonsillar Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
revised:
20
06
2019
accepted:
04
07
2019
pubmed:
16
7
2019
medline:
31
1
2020
entrez:
16
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To benchmark and improve, through means of a targeted intervention, the quality of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) in the Netherlands. The short and long-term impact of this intervention was assessed. A delineated computed tomography-scan of an oropharynx HNC case was sent to all 15 Dutch radiation therapy centers treating HNC. Aims for planning target volume and organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry were established by consensus. Each center generated a treatment plan. In a targeted intervention, OAR sparing of all plans was discussed, and centers with the best OAR sparing shared their planning strategies. Impact of the intervention was assessed by (1) short-term (half a year after intervention) replanning of the original case and (2) long-term (1 and 3 years after intervention) planning of new cases. Benchmarking revealed substantial difference in OAR doses. Initial mean doses were 22 Gy (range, 15-31 Gy), 35 Gy (18-49 Gy), and 37 Gy (20-46 Gy) for the contralateral parotid gland, contralateral submandibular gland, and combined swallowing structures, respectively. Replanning after targeted intervention significantly reduced mean doses and variation, but clinically relevant differences still remained: 18 Gy (14-22 Gy), 28 Gy (17-45 Gy), and 29 Gy (18-39 Gy), respectively. One and 3 years later the variation remained stable. Despite many years of HNC intensity modulated radiation therapy experience, initial treatment plans showed surprisingly large variations. The simple targeted intervention used in this analysis improved OAR sparing, and its impact was durable; however, fairly large dose differences still continue to exist. Additional work is needed to understand these variations and to minimize them. A national radiation oncology platform can be instrumental for developing and maintaining high-quality planning protocols.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31306734
pii: S0360-3016(19)33451-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.005
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
514-524Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.