Electroencephalography theta/beta ratio covaries with mind wandering and functional connectivity in the executive control network.
Adolescent
Adult
Attention
/ physiology
Beta Rhythm
/ physiology
Brain
/ diagnostic imaging
Brain Mapping
Electroencephalography
Executive Function
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Nerve Net
/ diagnostic imaging
Neuropsychological Tests
Theta Rhythm
/ physiology
Young Adult
EEG
controlled thought
default mode network
executive control
mind wandering
Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
ISSN: 1749-6632
Titre abrégé: Ann N Y Acad Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7506858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
22
02
2019
revised:
17
05
2019
accepted:
03
06
2019
pubmed:
17
7
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
17
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ratio between frontal resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) theta and beta frequency power (theta/beta ratio, TBR) is negatively related to cognitive control. It is unknown which psychological processes during resting state account for this. Increased theta and reduced beta power are observed during mind wandering (MW), and MW is related to decreased connectivity in the executive control network (ECN) and increased connectivity in the default mode network (DMN). The goal of this study was to test if MW-related fluctuations in TBR covary with such functional variation in ECN and DMN connectivity and if this functional variation is related to resting-state TBR. Data were analyzed for 26 participants who performed a 40-min breath-counting task and reported the occurrence of MW episodes while EEG was measured and again during magnetic resonance imaging. Frontal TBR was higher during MW than controlled thought and this was marginally related to resting-state TBR. DMN connectivity was higher and ECN connectivity was lower during MW. Greater ECN connectivity during focus than MW was correlated to lower TBR during focus than MW. These results provide the first evidence of the neural correlates of TBR and its functional dynamics and further establish TBR's usefulness for the study of executive control, in normal and potentially abnormal psychology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31310007
doi: 10.1111/nyas.14180
pmc: PMC6852238
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
52-64Subventions
Organisme : Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
ID : #452-12-003
Pays : International
Organisme : Leiden University Fund
ID : CWB # 7518 SV
Pays : International
Organisme : Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
ID : 452-12-003
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of New York Academy of Sciences.
Références
Biol Psychol. 2018 May;135:8-17
pubmed: 29518523
Behav Res Ther. 2012 Oct;50(10):636-46
pubmed: 22863541
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Dec;94(3):365-72
pubmed: 25219892
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1746-1754
pubmed: 28772244
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):196-204
pubmed: 19210090
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Aug 15;66(4):398-401
pubmed: 19500774
Biol Psychol. 2019 Jan;140:19-27
pubmed: 30458199
Int J Psychophysiol. 1993 Sep;15(2):123-33
pubmed: 8244840
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1117-22
pubmed: 22941876
Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):393-5
pubmed: 17234951
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Dec;17(6):649-55
pubmed: 18339546
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):782-91
pubmed: 24379166
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56
pubmed: 17329432
Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
pubmed: 17073528
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2000;60(2):247-60
pubmed: 10909182
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;118(7):1472-9
pubmed: 17502165
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 17;29(24):7679-85
pubmed: 19535579
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1129:141-52
pubmed: 18591476
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Nov;31(11):2376-83
pubmed: 16855530
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jun;10(6):410-22
pubmed: 19455173
Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Jun 15;45(12):1657-60
pubmed: 10376129
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:14-25
pubmed: 24793128
Pain. 2009 Feb;141(3):215-21
pubmed: 19121558
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Oct;123(10):1958-65
pubmed: 22542439
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):723-9
pubmed: 23547244
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
pubmed: 10945922
Front Neurosci. 2015 Jan 05;8:433
pubmed: 25601824
Trends Neurosci. 2005 Feb;28(2):67-72
pubmed: 15667928
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e113-25
pubmed: 21531388
Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;117(6):1161-8
pubmed: 14674837
Motiv Emot. 2012 Mar;36(1):46-54
pubmed: 22448078
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Sep;15(3):598-606
pubmed: 25860658
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13040-5
pubmed: 19620724
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Mar;91(3):172-7
pubmed: 24184042
Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):306-24
pubmed: 18466742
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Feb;60(2):113-24
pubmed: 16439263
Psychophysiology. 2018 Dec;55(12):e13274
pubmed: 30132917
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Mar;35(3):1061-73
pubmed: 23404748
J Atten Disord. 2013 Jul;17(5):374-83
pubmed: 23086616
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):118-25
pubmed: 19121953
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jul;38(7):3491-3501
pubmed: 28390165
Dev Psychobiol. 2004 Jan;44(1):68-83
pubmed: 14704991
Biol Psychol. 2010 Feb;83(2):73-8
pubmed: 19897008
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Feb;66(2):137-44
pubmed: 2431878
Int J Psychophysiol. 2004 Jun;53(1):71-3
pubmed: 15172137
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 23;8(10):e77554
pubmed: 24194889
Biol Psychol. 2018 Jul;136:100-110
pubmed: 29792908
Brain Res Rev. 2007 Jan;53(1):63-88
pubmed: 16887192
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Mar;114(3):529-40
pubmed: 12705433
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Oct;12(2):315-20
pubmed: 11587900
Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):519-535
pubmed: 23607430
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):685-90
pubmed: 15878265
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;57(1):4-17
pubmed: 26099166
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):750-60
pubmed: 21782031
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;114(2):171-83
pubmed: 12559224
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):945-71
pubmed: 20658859
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Nov;29(7):607-16
pubmed: 19682781
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:272-281
pubmed: 27989779
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1991 Sep;16(3):201-25
pubmed: 1932259
Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt B):203-212
pubmed: 26407521
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(3):377-95
pubmed: 17145079
Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt A):49-52
pubmed: 27697551
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):1160-7
pubmed: 21489409
Behav Res Ther. 1998 Sep;36(9):809-48
pubmed: 9701859
Brain Res Bull. 2001 Feb;54(3):287-98
pubmed: 11287133
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Dec;17(6):656-64
pubmed: 18221864
Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):705-711
pubmed: 27162098
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Nov;112(11):2098-105
pubmed: 11682348
Brain Res. 2009 May 13;1270:95-106
pubmed: 19306850
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8
pubmed: 12506194
Percept Mot Skills. 1967 Dec;25(3):697-703
pubmed: 6081429
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;55(4):468-84
pubmed: 6187540
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):3040-7
pubmed: 20946963
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 14;6(2):e16997
pubmed: 21347270
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):156-65
pubmed: 20359884
J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):225-36
pubmed: 12003445
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Dec;87:76-108
pubmed: 27616718
Trends Neurosci. 2011 Dec;34(12):611-8
pubmed: 22018805
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):458-69
pubmed: 18004943
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:331-61
pubmed: 21126180
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Jun;37(6):304-14
pubmed: 24766931
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499