Long term performance and safety of His bundle pacing: A multicenter experience.
Action Potentials
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atrioventricular Block
/ diagnosis
Bradycardia
/ diagnosis
Bundle of His
/ physiopathology
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
/ adverse effects
Equipment Failure
Female
Heart Rate
Humans
Italy
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial
Pennsylvania
Retrospective Studies
Sick Sinus Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
His bundle pacing
electrical performances
safety
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
26
04
2019
revised:
20
06
2019
accepted:
23
06
2019
pubmed:
17
7
2019
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
17
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Several single-center short-term studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and positive clinical outcomes of permanent His bundle pacing (HBP). We performed a retrospective study to evaluate long-term technical and safety performances of HBP in a large population of pacemaker patients from two different centers. The analysis includes 844 patients (345 female, mean age = 75 ± 9 years) who underwent successful permanent HBP for pacemaker indications from 2004 to 2016. The main endpoints were long term electrical performances including pacing threshold, sensing, impedance, and freedom from pacing related complications. The pacing indication was AV Block in 348 (41.2%) patients, sinus node disease in 147 (17.4%), any bradycardia indication in patients with atrial fibrillation in 335 (39.7%) patients and need for cardiac resynchronization therapy in 14 (1.7%) patients. Mean pacing capture thresholds and sensed R waves were 1.6 V and 5.8 mV, respectively at implant and 2.0 V and 6.1 mV at chronic follow-up. During the median follow up of 3 years (interquartile range = 1-6 years), HBP was free of any complication in 91.6% of patients. In the first 368 patients, HBP was achieved using a deflectable curve delivery system, while in 476 using the fixed curve sheath. A significant difference was found in the thresholds (2.4 ± 1.0 V and 1.7 ± 1.1 V, P < .001, respectively) and complications (11.9% and 4.2%, P < .001, respectively) between the two groups. Permanent HBP was safe and effective during long-term follow-up. The fixed curved delivery sheath offered significantly better electrical parameters and reliability over time. The results of this multicenter study are consistent with recent studies.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1594-1601Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.