Risk Factors for Major Adverse Events after Surgical Closure of Ventricular Septal Defect in Patients Less than 1 Year of Age: A Single-Center Retrospective.
Age Factors
Body Weight
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
/ methods
Female
Heart Septal Defects, Ventricular
/ surgery
Humans
Infant
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Male
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Statistics, Nonparametric
Time Factors
Wound Closure Techniques
/ adverse effects
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Risk Factors
Ventricular Heart Septal Defect
Journal
Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1678-9741
Titre abrégé: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101677045
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2019
01 06 2019
Historique:
entrez:
17
7
2019
pubmed:
17
7
2019
medline:
8
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To reveal the risk factors that can lead to a complicated course and an increased morbidity in patients < 1 year old after surgical ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure. We reviewed a consecutive series of patients who were admitted to our institution for surgical VSD closure who were under one year of age, between 2015 and 2018. Mechanical ventilation (MV) time > 24 hours, intensive care unit (ICU) stay longer than three days, and hospital stay longer than seven days were defined as "prolonged". Unplanned reoperation, complete heart block requiring a permanent pacemaker implantation, sudden circulatory arrest, and death were considered as significant major adverse events (MAE). VSD closure was performed in 185 patients. The median age was five (1-12) months. There was prolonged MV time in 54 (29.2%) patients. Four patients (2.2%) required permanent pacemaker implantation. Hemodynamically significant residual VSD was observed in six (3.2%) patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in one (0.5%) patient. Small age (< 4 months) (P-value<0.001) and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (P=0.03) were found to delay extubation and to prolong MV time. Low birth weight at the operation was associated with MAE (P=0.03). Higher body weight during operation had a reducing effect on the MAE frequency and shortened the MV duration, ICU stay, and hospital stay. As a conclusion, for patients who are scheduled to undergo VSD closure, body weight should be taken into consideration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31310473
doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0299
pmc: PMC6629230
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
335-343Références
Congenit Heart Dis. 2014 May-Jun;9(3):211-5
pubmed: 23764088
Pediatr Cardiol. 2008 Jan;29(1):36-9
pubmed: 17676370
Echocardiography. 2018 Jul;35(7):999-1004
pubmed: 29577408
J Card Surg. 2013 Mar;28(2):174-9
pubmed: 23488581
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):264-270
pubmed: 27872996
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(31):e11770
pubmed: 30075604
Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Jun;38(5):915-921
pubmed: 28401252
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Apr;145(4):1046-1057.e1
pubmed: 22835225
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3):641-7
pubmed: 23414985
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):544-9; discussion 550-1
pubmed: 20103339
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):948-56
pubmed: 16928514
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):148-58
pubmed: 26107445
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2018 Jun;19(6):379-385
pubmed: 29912227
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;58(21):2241-7
pubmed: 22078432