A novel approach using volumetric dynamic airway computed tomography to determine positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings to maintain airway patency in ventilated infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Airway
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Dynamic computed tomography
Infants
Positive end-expiratory pressure
Tracheobronchomalacia
Journal
Pediatric radiology
ISSN: 1432-1998
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0365332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
04
03
2019
accepted:
25
06
2019
revised:
25
05
2019
pubmed:
18
7
2019
medline:
1
8
2020
entrez:
18
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key mechanical ventilator setting in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Excessive PEEP can result in insufficient carbon dioxide elimination and lung damage, while insufficient PEEP can result in impaired gas exchange secondary to airway and alveolar collapse. Determining PEEP settings based on clinical parameters alone is challenging and variable. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using dynamic airway CT to determine the lowest PEEP setting sufficient to maintain expiratory central airway patency of at least 50% of the inspiratory cross-sectional area in children with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. We retrospectively identified all infants with BPD who underwent volumetric CT with a dynamic airway protocol for PEEP optimization from December 2014 through April 2019. Sixteen infants with BPD underwent 17 CT exams. Each CT exam consisted of acquisitions spanning the trachea and mainstem bronchi. We measured cross-sectional area of the trachea and mainstem bronchi and qualitatively assessed the amount of atelectasis. We documented changes in management as a result of the CT exam. The average effective dose was 0.1-0.8 mSv/scan. Of 17 CT exams, PEEP was increased in 9, decreased in 3 and unchanged after 5 exams. Dynamic airway CT shows promise to assist the clinician in determining PEEP settings to maintain airway patency in infants with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. Further evaluation of the impact of this maneuver on gas exchange, cardiac output and other physiological measures is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key mechanical ventilator setting in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Excessive PEEP can result in insufficient carbon dioxide elimination and lung damage, while insufficient PEEP can result in impaired gas exchange secondary to airway and alveolar collapse. Determining PEEP settings based on clinical parameters alone is challenging and variable.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to describe our experience using dynamic airway CT to determine the lowest PEEP setting sufficient to maintain expiratory central airway patency of at least 50% of the inspiratory cross-sectional area in children with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively identified all infants with BPD who underwent volumetric CT with a dynamic airway protocol for PEEP optimization from December 2014 through April 2019. Sixteen infants with BPD underwent 17 CT exams. Each CT exam consisted of acquisitions spanning the trachea and mainstem bronchi. We measured cross-sectional area of the trachea and mainstem bronchi and qualitatively assessed the amount of atelectasis. We documented changes in management as a result of the CT exam.
RESULTS
The average effective dose was 0.1-0.8 mSv/scan. Of 17 CT exams, PEEP was increased in 9, decreased in 3 and unchanged after 5 exams.
CONCLUSION
Dynamic airway CT shows promise to assist the clinician in determining PEEP settings to maintain airway patency in infants with BPD requiring long-term ventilator support. Further evaluation of the impact of this maneuver on gas exchange, cardiac output and other physiological measures is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31312862
doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04465-7
pii: 10.1007/s00247-019-04465-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1276-1284Références
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jun 16;14(9):
pubmed: 28622012
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018 Jan;53(1):73-80
pubmed: 29148213
J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:28-33.e5
pubmed: 29275926
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jan;176(1):205-10
pubmed: 11133567
Radiology. 2009 Jul;252(1):7-22
pubmed: 19561247
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):219-227
pubmed: 28212059
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1990;9(4):224-32
pubmed: 2259555
Radiol Clin North Am. 2003 May;41(3):627-36
pubmed: 12797610
J Pediatr. 2009 May;154(5):635-6
pubmed: 19364555
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Aug;199(2):435-40
pubmed: 22826409
Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:170-177
pubmed: 29229093
J Perinatol. 2019 Feb;39(2):263-268
pubmed: 30518799
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36
pubmed: 24283226
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2017 Sep;24:17-18
pubmed: 28697967
J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;157(5):767-71.e1-3
pubmed: 20619854
Clin Radiol. 2016 Jan;71(1):e49-55
pubmed: 26611199
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Oct;49(10):1028-35
pubmed: 24166927