Refractory depression - mechanisms and efficacy of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RefraMED): findings of a randomised trial on benefits and harms.
Treatment-resistant depression
chronic depression
personality disorder
radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RO DBT)
randomised controlled trial
Journal
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
ISSN: 1472-1465
Titre abrégé: Br J Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0342367
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
19
7
2019
medline:
5
1
2021
entrez:
19
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Individuals with depression often do not respond to medication or psychotherapy. Radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RO DBT) is a new treatment targeting overcontrolled personality, common in refractory depression. To compare RO DBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) for refractory depression with TAU alone (trial registration: ISRCTN 85784627). RO DBT comprised 29 therapy sessions and 27 skills classes over 6 months. Our completed randomised trial evaluated RO DBT for refractory depression over 18 months in three British secondary care centres. Of 250 adult participants, we randomised 162 (65%) to RO DBT. The primary outcome was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), assessed masked and analysed by treatment allocated. After 7 months, immediately following therapy, RO DBT had significantly reduced depressive symptoms by 5.40 points on the HRSD relative to TAU (95% CI 0.94-9.85). After 12 months (primary end-point), the difference of 2.15 points on the HRSD in favour of RO DBT was not significant (95% CI -2.28 to 6.59); nor was that of 1.69 points on the HRSD at 18 months (95% CI -2.84 to 6.22). Throughout RO DBT participants reported significantly better psychological flexibility and emotional coping than controls. However, they reported eight possible serious adverse reactions compared with none in the control group. The RO DBT group reported significantly lower HRSD scores than the control group after 7 months, but not thereafter. The imbalance in serious adverse reactions was probably because of the controls' limited opportunities to report these.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Individuals with depression often do not respond to medication or psychotherapy. Radically open dialectical behaviour therapy (RO DBT) is a new treatment targeting overcontrolled personality, common in refractory depression.
AIMS
To compare RO DBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) for refractory depression with TAU alone (trial registration: ISRCTN 85784627).
METHOD
RO DBT comprised 29 therapy sessions and 27 skills classes over 6 months. Our completed randomised trial evaluated RO DBT for refractory depression over 18 months in three British secondary care centres. Of 250 adult participants, we randomised 162 (65%) to RO DBT. The primary outcome was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), assessed masked and analysed by treatment allocated.
RESULTS
After 7 months, immediately following therapy, RO DBT had significantly reduced depressive symptoms by 5.40 points on the HRSD relative to TAU (95% CI 0.94-9.85). After 12 months (primary end-point), the difference of 2.15 points on the HRSD in favour of RO DBT was not significant (95% CI -2.28 to 6.59); nor was that of 1.69 points on the HRSD at 18 months (95% CI -2.84 to 6.22). Throughout RO DBT participants reported significantly better psychological flexibility and emotional coping than controls. However, they reported eight possible serious adverse reactions compared with none in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS
The RO DBT group reported significantly lower HRSD scores than the control group after 7 months, but not thereafter. The imbalance in serious adverse reactions was probably because of the controls' limited opportunities to report these.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31317843
pii: S0007125019000539
doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.53
pmc: PMC7282863
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
204-212Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Brain Behav. 2016 May 03;6(8):e00486
pubmed: 27247856
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):1049-57
pubmed: 12214786
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Aug;77(4):775-87
pubmed: 19634969
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;22(2):131-43
pubmed: 17096462
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Nov;17(11):696-707
pubmed: 17521891
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Oct;54(5):724-5
pubmed: 3771893
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Aug 15;160(2):184-91
pubmed: 18573540
Psychol Med. 1999 Jul;29(4):869-78
pubmed: 10473314
Psychol Med. 2015 Nov;45(15):3269-79
pubmed: 26165748
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;63(11):963-71
pubmed: 12444808
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88
pubmed: 22035996
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Feb;112(1):72-80
pubmed: 12653415
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-45
pubmed: 12527538
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):120-9
pubmed: 18408526
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 07;13:293
pubmed: 24199611
Stat Med. 2011 Apr 30;30(9):922-34
pubmed: 21284014
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jun;78(6):1150-69
pubmed: 10870915
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 17;5(7):e008857
pubmed: 26187121
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2013 Fall;41(3):361-84
pubmed: 24001160