Tranexamic acid to improve functional status in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: the TICH-2 RCT.
Administration, Intravenous
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antifibrinolytic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Cerebral Hemorrhage
/ drug therapy
Double-Blind Method
Europe
Female
Glasgow Coma Scale
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Stroke
/ therapy
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
Tranexamic Acid
/ therapeutic use
INTRACEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE
RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
TRANEXAMIC ACID
Journal
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
ISSN: 2046-4924
Titre abrégé: Health Technol Assess
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706284
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
entrez:
20
7
2019
pubmed:
20
7
2019
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tranexamic acid reduces death due to bleeding after trauma and postpartum haemorrhage. The aim of the study was to assess if tranexamic acid is safe, reduces haematoma expansion and improves outcomes in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). The TICH-2 (Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage) study was a pragmatic, Phase III, prospective, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Acute stroke services at 124 hospitals in 12 countries (Denmark, Georgia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK). Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with ICH within 8 hours of onset. Exclusion criteria were ICH secondary to anticoagulation, thrombolysis, trauma or a known underlying structural abnormality; patients for whom tranexamic acid was thought to be contraindicated; prestroke dependence (i.e. patients with a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 4); life expectancy < 3 months; and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of < 5. Participants, allocated by randomisation, received 1 g of an intravenous tranexamic acid bolus followed by an 8-hour 1-g infusion or matching placebo (i.e. 0.9% saline). The primary outcome was functional status (death or dependency) at day 90, which was measured by the shift in the mRS score, using ordinal logistic regression, with adjustment for stratification and minimisation criteria. A total of 2325 participants (tranexamic acid, Despite attempts to enrol patients rapidly, the majority of participants were enrolled and treated > 4.5 hours after stroke onset. Pragmatic inclusion criteria led to a heterogeneous population of participants, some of whom had very large strokes. Although 12 countries enrolled participants, the majority (82.1%) were from the UK. Tranexamic acid did not affect a patient's functional status at 90 days after ICH, despite there being significant modest reductions in early death (by 7 days), haematoma expansion and SAEs, which is consistent with an antifibrinolytic effect. Tranexamic acid was safe, with no increase in thromboembolic events. Future work should focus on enrolling and treating patients early after stroke and identify which participants are most likely to benefit from haemostatic therapy. Large randomised trials are needed. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN93732214. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Stroke caused by bleeding in the brain [i.e. an intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH)] is a medical emergency. Around one-third of such strokes are complicated by continuing bleeding, which usually occurs within the first few hours after trauma and childbirth, and is associated with death or severe disability. Tranexamic acid is a drug that is seen to reduce death from bleeding after trauma and childbirth. The study enrolled adults within 8 hours of an ICH into this large randomised trial. Half of the participants were given an injection of tranexamic acid and the other half placebo (in the form of salt water). The main aim of the trial was to measure changes in recovery by a telephone questionnaire on how much the person was able to do or needed help with 90 days after the stroke (i.e. functional status). Other measures included amount of brain bleeding, complications after stroke (serious adverse events), drug side effects and death within 7 days of stroke. A total of 2325 participants from 124 hospitals in 12 countries were enrolled between 2013 and 2017. Participants treated with tranexamic acid had no significant difference in functional status 90 days after stroke. There were small but significant reductions in brain bleeding, death in the first 7 days and complications after stroke, and tranexamic acid was safe with no increased side effects. Treatment with tranexamic acid did not result in a significant improvement in recovery at 90 days (i.e. functional status), despite small reductions in the number of early deaths, amount of brain bleeding and the number of complications. Larger trials are needed to confirm if these small benefits observed after treatment with tranexamic acid can significantly improve functional status after stroke due to bleeding in the brain (ICH).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Tranexamic acid reduces death due to bleeding after trauma and postpartum haemorrhage.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to assess if tranexamic acid is safe, reduces haematoma expansion and improves outcomes in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).
DESIGN
The TICH-2 (Tranexamic acid for hyperacute primary IntraCerebral Haemorrhage) study was a pragmatic, Phase III, prospective, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING
Acute stroke services at 124 hospitals in 12 countries (Denmark, Georgia, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the UK).
PARTICIPANTS
Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with ICH within 8 hours of onset.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Exclusion criteria were ICH secondary to anticoagulation, thrombolysis, trauma or a known underlying structural abnormality; patients for whom tranexamic acid was thought to be contraindicated; prestroke dependence (i.e. patients with a modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 4); life expectancy < 3 months; and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of < 5.
INTERVENTIONS
Participants, allocated by randomisation, received 1 g of an intravenous tranexamic acid bolus followed by an 8-hour 1-g infusion or matching placebo (i.e. 0.9% saline).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
The primary outcome was functional status (death or dependency) at day 90, which was measured by the shift in the mRS score, using ordinal logistic regression, with adjustment for stratification and minimisation criteria.
RESULTS
A total of 2325 participants (tranexamic acid,
LIMITATIONS
Despite attempts to enrol patients rapidly, the majority of participants were enrolled and treated > 4.5 hours after stroke onset. Pragmatic inclusion criteria led to a heterogeneous population of participants, some of whom had very large strokes. Although 12 countries enrolled participants, the majority (82.1%) were from the UK.
CONCLUSIONS
Tranexamic acid did not affect a patient's functional status at 90 days after ICH, despite there being significant modest reductions in early death (by 7 days), haematoma expansion and SAEs, which is consistent with an antifibrinolytic effect. Tranexamic acid was safe, with no increase in thromboembolic events.
FUTURE WORK
Future work should focus on enrolling and treating patients early after stroke and identify which participants are most likely to benefit from haemostatic therapy. Large randomised trials are needed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN93732214.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
BACKGROUND
Stroke caused by bleeding in the brain [i.e. an intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH)] is a medical emergency. Around one-third of such strokes are complicated by continuing bleeding, which usually occurs within the first few hours after trauma and childbirth, and is associated with death or severe disability. Tranexamic acid is a drug that is seen to reduce death from bleeding after trauma and childbirth.
METHODS
The study enrolled adults within 8 hours of an ICH into this large randomised trial. Half of the participants were given an injection of tranexamic acid and the other half placebo (in the form of salt water). The main aim of the trial was to measure changes in recovery by a telephone questionnaire on how much the person was able to do or needed help with 90 days after the stroke (i.e. functional status). Other measures included amount of brain bleeding, complications after stroke (serious adverse events), drug side effects and death within 7 days of stroke.
RESULTS
A total of 2325 participants from 124 hospitals in 12 countries were enrolled between 2013 and 2017. Participants treated with tranexamic acid had no significant difference in functional status 90 days after stroke. There were small but significant reductions in brain bleeding, death in the first 7 days and complications after stroke, and tranexamic acid was safe with no increased side effects.
CONCLUSION
Treatment with tranexamic acid did not result in a significant improvement in recovery at 90 days (i.e. functional status), despite small reductions in the number of early deaths, amount of brain bleeding and the number of complications. Larger trials are needed to confirm if these small benefits observed after treatment with tranexamic acid can significantly improve functional status after stroke due to bleeding in the brain (ICH).
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Stroke caused by bleeding in the brain [i.e. an intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH)] is a medical emergency. Around one-third of such strokes are complicated by continuing bleeding, which usually occurs within the first few hours after trauma and childbirth, and is associated with death or severe disability. Tranexamic acid is a drug that is seen to reduce death from bleeding after trauma and childbirth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31322116
doi: 10.3310/hta23350
pmc: PMC6680370
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antifibrinolytic Agents
0
Tranexamic Acid
6T84R30KC1
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN93732214']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-48Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M009211/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : HTA/14/190/01
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/14/50/30891
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 11/129/109
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1002605
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : SP/12/2/29422
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Rustam Al-Shahi Salman is a member of the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Funding Board panel. Lelia Duley reports grants from the Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit during the conduct of the study. Christian Ovesen reports grants from the Velux Foundation (Søborg, Denmark), the Hojmosegaard Grant/Danish Medical Association (Copenhagen, Denmark), the Axel Muusfeldt’s Foundation (Albertslund, Denmark), the University of Copenhagen (Copenhagen Denmark) and non-financial support from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD; Kenilworth, NJ, USA) outside the submitted work. Robert A Dineen reports grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (project number 11/129/109) during the conduct of the study. Timothy J England reports grants from the NIHR HTA programme during the conduct of the study. Thompson G Robinson reports grants from the University of Leicester. Christine Roffe has been a member of the HTA General Board since 2017. David Werring reports personal fees from Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany) outside the submitted work. Philip M Bath reports grants from the British Heart Foundation and the NIHR HTA programme during the conduct of the study, others from Platelet Solutions Ltd (Nottingham, UK) and personal fees from Diamedica (UK) Ltd (Bratton Fleming, UK), Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland), Phagenesis Ltd (Manchester, UK), ReNeuron Group plc (Bridgend, UK), Athersys Inc. (Cleveland, OH, USA) and Covidien (Dublin, Ireland) outside the submitted work.