A systematic review of methods of citric acid cough reflex testing.


Journal

Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics
ISSN: 1522-9629
Titre abrégé: Pulm Pharmacol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9715279

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2019
Historique:
received: 20 06 2019
revised: 16 07 2019
accepted: 17 07 2019
pubmed: 22 7 2019
medline: 1 8 2020
entrez: 22 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This systematic review summarises and appraises methods of citric acid cough reflex testing (CRT) documented in published literature. Electronic databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus were searched up to and including 11th February 2018. Studies reporting a method of citric acid CRT, published in peer-reviewed journals in English or Spanish, were assessed for the inclusion criteria. Of the selected studies, information on the instrumentation and CRT protocol was extracted. A total of 129 studies were included. Instrumentation and protocols differed widely across studies. Reporting of methods of citric acid CRT was sub-standard, with many crucial methodological components omitted from published manuscripts, preventing their full replication. Considerable methodological variability exists for citric acid CRT in published literature. The findings suggest that caution is warranted in comparing citric acid cough thresholds across studies. Full replication of previously published methods of citric acid CRT is limited due to crucial elements of the citric acid CRT protocol being omitted from published manuscripts. These findings have implications on the use of citric acid CRT in clinical and pharmaceutical studies to evaluate the effects of antitussive medications and cough therapies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31326628
pii: S1094-5539(19)30140-3
doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2019.101827
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Citric Acid 2968PHW8QP

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101827

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Emma Wallace (E)

University of Canterbury, Rose Centre for Stroke Recovery and Research, Dept of Communication Disorders, Christchurch, New Zealand. Electronic address: eswallac@tcd.ie.

Esther Guiu Hernandez (E)

University of Canterbury, Rose Centre for Stroke Recovery and Research, Dept of Communication Disorders, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Alicia Ang (A)

University of Canterbury, Rose Centre for Stroke Recovery and Research, Dept of Communication Disorders, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Sarah Hiew (S)

University of Canterbury, Rose Centre for Stroke Recovery and Research, Dept of Communication Disorders, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Phoebe Macrae (P)

University of Canterbury, Rose Centre for Stroke Recovery and Research, Dept of Communication Disorders, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH