Endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: one year results from the first international, open-label, prospective, multicentre study.
Adult
Aged
Blood Glucose
/ metabolism
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ blood
Duodenoscopy
/ methods
Duodenum
/ surgery
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
/ adverse effects
Feasibility Studies
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ metabolism
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Intestinal Mucosa
/ surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
diabetes mellitus
duodenal mucosa
endoscopic procedures
glucose metabolism
therapeutic endoscopy
Journal
Gut
ISSN: 1468-3288
Titre abrégé: Gut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985108R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
23
01
2019
revised:
19
06
2019
accepted:
30
06
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
30
1
2020
entrez:
24
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The duodenum has become a metabolic treatment target through bariatric surgery learnings and the specific observation that bypassing, excluding or altering duodenal nutrient exposure elicits favourable metabolic changes. Duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a novel endoscopic procedure that has been shown to improve glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) irrespective of body mass index (BMI) changes. DMR involves catheter-based circumferential mucosal lifting followed by hydrothermal ablation of duodenal mucosa. This multicentre study evaluates safety and feasibility of DMR and its effect on glycaemia at 24 weeks and 12 months. International multicentre, open-label study. Patients (BMI 24-40) with T2D (HbA1c 59-86 mmol/mol (7.5%-10.0%)) on stable oral glucose-lowering medication underwent DMR. Glucose-lowering medication was kept stable for at least 24 weeks post DMR. During follow-up, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight, hepatic transaminases, Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), adverse events (AEs) and treatment satisfaction were determined and analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Forty-six patients were included of whom 37 (80%) underwent complete DMR and 36 were finally analysed; in remaining patients, mainly technical issues were observed. Twenty-four patients had at least one AE (52%) related to DMR. Of these, 81% were mild. One SAE and no unanticipated AEs were reported. Twenty-four weeks post DMR (n=36), HbA1c (-10±2 mmol/mol (-0.9%±0.2%), p<0.001), FPG (-1.7±0.5 mmol/L, p<0.001) and HOMA-IR improved (-2.9±1.1, p<0.001), weight was modestly reduced (-2.5±0.6 kg, p<0.001) and hepatic transaminase levels decreased. Effects were sustained at 12 months. Change in HbA1c did not correlate with modest weight loss. Diabetes treatment satisfaction scores improved significantly. In this multicentre study, DMR was found to be a feasible and safe endoscopic procedure that elicited durable glycaemic improvement in suboptimally controlled T2D patients using oral glucose-lowering medication irrespective of weight loss. Effects on the liver are examined further. NCT02413567.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The duodenum has become a metabolic treatment target through bariatric surgery learnings and the specific observation that bypassing, excluding or altering duodenal nutrient exposure elicits favourable metabolic changes. Duodenal mucosal resurfacing (DMR) is a novel endoscopic procedure that has been shown to improve glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) irrespective of body mass index (BMI) changes. DMR involves catheter-based circumferential mucosal lifting followed by hydrothermal ablation of duodenal mucosa. This multicentre study evaluates safety and feasibility of DMR and its effect on glycaemia at 24 weeks and 12 months.
METHODS
International multicentre, open-label study. Patients (BMI 24-40) with T2D (HbA1c 59-86 mmol/mol (7.5%-10.0%)) on stable oral glucose-lowering medication underwent DMR. Glucose-lowering medication was kept stable for at least 24 weeks post DMR. During follow-up, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight, hepatic transaminases, Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), adverse events (AEs) and treatment satisfaction were determined and analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.
RESULTS
Forty-six patients were included of whom 37 (80%) underwent complete DMR and 36 were finally analysed; in remaining patients, mainly technical issues were observed. Twenty-four patients had at least one AE (52%) related to DMR. Of these, 81% were mild. One SAE and no unanticipated AEs were reported. Twenty-four weeks post DMR (n=36), HbA1c (-10±2 mmol/mol (-0.9%±0.2%), p<0.001), FPG (-1.7±0.5 mmol/L, p<0.001) and HOMA-IR improved (-2.9±1.1, p<0.001), weight was modestly reduced (-2.5±0.6 kg, p<0.001) and hepatic transaminase levels decreased. Effects were sustained at 12 months. Change in HbA1c did not correlate with modest weight loss. Diabetes treatment satisfaction scores improved significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
In this multicentre study, DMR was found to be a feasible and safe endoscopic procedure that elicited durable glycaemic improvement in suboptimally controlled T2D patients using oral glucose-lowering medication irrespective of weight loss. Effects on the liver are examined further.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT02413567.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31331994
pii: gutjnl-2019-318349
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318349
pmc: PMC6984054
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Glucose
0
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
hemoglobin A1c protein, human
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02413567']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
295-303Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: FH reports speaker fees from Sanofi, Bioton and Astra Zeneca. DH reports consultancy for Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Roche and speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Boerhinger, Napp, Medtronic, Sunovion and Fractyl Laboratories. LRG reports consultancy for Fractyl Laboratories. MGN reports consultancy for Fractyl Laboratories, GI Dynamics, GI Windows, Ethicon EndoSurgery, Meditronics, Apollo EndoSurgery, Consultant and Scientific Advisory Board member for GI Dynamics and Faculty in training courses for Ethicon EndoSurgery and Meditronics.
Références
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul;36(7):1859-64
pubmed: 23801799
Dig Surg. 2014;31(1):48-54
pubmed: 24819497
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 22;370(21):2002-13
pubmed: 24679060
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 18;14:189
pubmed: 25407511
JAMA. 2014 Sep 3;312(9):934-42
pubmed: 25182102
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Sep;19(9):1295-1305
pubmed: 28417575
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;94(3):311-21
pubmed: 22079683
Lancet. 2015 Sep 5;386(9997):964-73
pubmed: 26369473
JAMA Surg. 2015 Dec;150(12):1117-24
pubmed: 26374954
Cell Metab. 2014 Nov 4;20(5):753-760
pubmed: 25176147
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):893-901
pubmed: 27222547
Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2254-2261
pubmed: 27519448
Diabetes Care. 2006 Mar;29(3):531-7
pubmed: 16505501
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Sep 18;147(6):386-99
pubmed: 17638715
Diabetes Care. 1999 Mar;22(3):530-2
pubmed: 10097946
Gut. 2014 Aug;63(8):1238-46
pubmed: 24107591
Diabetologia. 2015 Mar;58(3):429-42
pubmed: 25583541
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jul;129(1):113-21
pubmed: 16012941
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1002-7; discussion 1007-9
pubmed: 18043102
Gastroenterology. 2018 Mar;154(4):773-777
pubmed: 29428335