Leaf trait variability between and within subalpine grassland species differs depending on site conditions and herbivory.
interspecific trait variability
plant–herbivore interactions
predicting species identity
progressive exclusion of herbivores
robustness assumption
scale of environmental change
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 07 2019
24 07 2019
Historique:
entrez:
25
7
2019
pubmed:
25
7
2019
medline:
28
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plant traits are commonly used to predict ecosystem-level processes, but the validity of such predictions is dependent on the assumption that trait variability between species is greater than trait variability within a species-the robustness assumption. Here, we compare leaf trait intraspecific and interspecific variability depending on geographical differences between sites and 5 years of experimental herbivore exclusion in two vegetation types of subalpine grasslands in Switzerland. Four leaf traits were measured from eight herbaceous species common to all 18 sites. Intraspecific trait variability differed significantly depending on site and herbivory. However, the amount and structure of variability depended on the trait measured and whether considering leaf traits separately or multiple leaf traits simultaneously. Leaf phosphorus concentration showed the highest intraspecific variability, while specific leaf area showed the highest interspecific variability and displayed intraspecific variability only in response to herbivore exclusion. Species identity based on multiple traits was not predictable. We find intraspecific variability is an essential consideration when using plant functional traits as a common currency not just species mean traits. This is particularly true for leaf nutrient concentrations, which showed high intraspecific variability in response to site differences and herbivore exclusion, a finding which suggests that the robustness assumption does not always hold.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31337314
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0429
pmc: PMC6661350
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.n41d2dv']
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4570973']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20190429Références
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):183-92
pubmed: 21367482
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2674-82
pubmed: 23431597
Ecology. 2016 Aug;97(8):1979-1993
pubmed: 27859208
Ecol Lett. 2010 Jul;13(7):838-48
pubmed: 20482582
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jul;25(7):2485-2498
pubmed: 31056841
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
pubmed: 15103368
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Apr;27(4):244-52
pubmed: 22244797
Stat Med. 2003 Nov 30;22(22):3527-41
pubmed: 14601017
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
Environ Entomol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1409-16
pubmed: 23321087
Ecology. 2017 Jan;98(1):239-252
pubmed: 28052395
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):178-85
pubmed: 16701083
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 11;9(1):3684
pubmed: 30206214
Ecol Lett. 2015 Dec;18(12):1406-19
pubmed: 26415616
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 24;286(1907):20190429
pubmed: 31337314
Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1908-20
pubmed: 18705377
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar;3(3):400-406
pubmed: 30718853
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 May;92(2):1156-1173
pubmed: 27103505