Molecular profiling and molecular classification of endometrioid ovarian carcinomas.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Endometrioid
/ classification
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
/ classification
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous
/ classification
DNA Mutational Analysis
Female
Humans
Microsatellite Instability
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ classification
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Endometrioid ovarian cancer
Heterogeneity
Massively parallel sequencing
Molecular subtypes
Somatic mutations
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
19
04
2019
revised:
09
07
2019
accepted:
10
07
2019
pubmed:
26
7
2019
medline:
28
10
2019
entrez:
26
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (EOCs) comprise 5-10% of all ovarian cancers and commonly co-occur with synchronous endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). We sought to examine the molecular characteristics of pure EOCs in patients without concomitant EEC. EOCs and matched normal samples were subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting 341-468 cancer-related genes (n = 8) or whole-genome sequencing (n = 28). Mutational frequencies of EOCs were compared to those of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs; n = 224) and EECs (n = 186) from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and synchronous EOCs (n = 23). EOCs were heterogeneous, frequently harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, CTNNB1, ARID1A and TP53 mutations. EOCs were distinct from HGSOCs at the mutational level, less frequently harboring TP53 but more frequently displaying KRAS, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN and CTNNB1 mutations. Compared to synchronous EOCs and pure EECs, pure EOCs less frequently harbored PTEN, PIK3R1 and ARID1A mutations. Akin to EECs, EOCs could be stratified into the four molecular subtypes: 3% POLE (ultramutated), 19% MSI (hypermutated), 17% copy-number high (serous-like) and 61% copy-number low (endometrioid). In addition to microsatellite instability, a subset of EOCs harbored potentially targetable mutations, including AKT1 and ERBB2 hotspot mutations. EOCs of MSI (hypermutated) subtype uniformly displayed a good outcome. EOCs are heterogeneous at the genomic level and harbor targetable genetic alterations. Despite the similarities in the repertoire of somatic mutations between pure EOCs, synchronous EOCs and EECs, the frequencies of mutations affecting known driver genes differ. Further studies are required to define the impact of the molecular subtypes on the outcome and treatment of EOC patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31340883
pii: S0090-8258(19)31398-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.012
pmc: PMC6736779
mid: NIHMS1535885
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
516-523Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Am J Pathol. 2004 May;164(5):1511-8
pubmed: 15111296
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Cell Syst. 2018 Mar 28;6(3):271-281.e7
pubmed: 29596782
Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 19;5:5006
pubmed: 25233892
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):e268-78
pubmed: 24872110
Nat Med. 2017 Jun;23(6):703-713
pubmed: 28481359
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 1;23(19):5687-5695
pubmed: 28679771
Behav Brain Res. 2001 Nov 1;125(1-2):279-84
pubmed: 11682119
Genome Biol. 2015 May 22;16:107
pubmed: 25994018
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9728
pubmed: 28852190
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):615-622
pubmed: 28625395
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Sep 1;110(9):1030-1034
pubmed: 29506079
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 25;113(43):12238-12243
pubmed: 27791010
BMC Med Genomics. 2017 May 19;10(1):33
pubmed: 28526081
Cancer Discov. 2013 Feb;3(2):145-7
pubmed: 23400474
Genome Med. 2015 Aug 07;7(1):87
pubmed: 26257827
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Feb;34(2):155-63
pubmed: 26619011
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15
pubmed: 21720365
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:
pubmed: 28890946
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Feb 01;108(6):djv427
pubmed: 26832770
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Feb;16(2):201-209
pubmed: 29439179
J Pathol. 2017 Oct;243(2):230-241
pubmed: 28718916
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2251-2259
pubmed: 28489509
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;2(10):1310-1315
pubmed: 27532364
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;2017:
pubmed: 30211344
Mod Pathol. 2016 Nov;29(11):1390-1398
pubmed: 27491810
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):189-194
pubmed: 29420467
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 1;19(5):961-8
pubmed: 23307860
Mod Pathol. 2014 Jan;27(1):128-34
pubmed: 23765252
Nat Genet. 2017 Jun;49(6):856-865
pubmed: 28436987
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;28(2):e20
pubmed: 28028993
Nat Commun. 2018 May 8;9(1):1816
pubmed: 29739933
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):67-73
pubmed: 23636398
Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):1015-6
pubmed: 24371154
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;14(16):5198-208
pubmed: 18698038
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Apr;13(4):385-94
pubmed: 22361336
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Feb 01;108(6):djv428
pubmed: 26832771
Brief Bioinform. 2013 Mar;14(2):178-92
pubmed: 22517427
Cancer Discov. 2018 Feb;8(2):174-183
pubmed: 29247016