Identifying the Role of Block Length in Neural Heat Block to Reduce Temperatures During Infrared Neural Inhibition.
block length
heat block
infrared inhibition
infrared neural inhibition
neuromodulation
neurophotonics
optical inhibition
optical modulation
Journal
Lasers in surgery and medicine
ISSN: 1096-9101
Titre abrégé: Lasers Surg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8007168
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
accepted:
30
06
2019
pmc-release:
25
01
2021
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
27
8
2021
entrez:
27
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study is to assess the hypothesis that the length of axon heated, defined here as block length (BL), affects the temperature required for thermal inhibition of action potential propagation applied using laser heating. The presence of such a phenomenon has implications for how this technique, called infrared neural inhibition (INI), may be applied in a clinically safe manner since it suggests that temperatures required for therapy may be reduced through the proper spatial application of light. Here, we validate the presence of this phenomenon by assessing how the peak temperatures during INI are reduced when two different BLs are applied using irradiation from either one or two adjacent optical fibers. Assessment of the role of BL was carried out over two phases. First, a computational proof of concept was performed in the neural conduction simulation environment, NEURON, simulating the response of action potentials to increased temperatures applied at different full-width at half-maxima (FWHM) along axons. Second, ex vivo validation of these predictions was performed by measuring the radiant exposure, peak temperature rise, and FWHM of heat distributions associated with INI from one or two adjacent optical fibers. Electrophysiological assessment of radiant exposures at inhibition threshold were carried out in ex vivo Aplysia californica (sea slug) pleural abdominal nerves ( n = 6), an invertebrate with unmyelinated axons. Measurement of the maximum temperature rise required for induced heat block was performed in a water bath using a fine wire thermocouple. Finally, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) was performed on a nerve immersed in saline to assess the elevated temperature distribution at these radiant exposures. Computational modeling in NEURON provided a theoretical proof of concept that the BL is an important factor contributing to the peak temperature required during neural heat block, predicting a 11.7% reduction in temperature rise when the FWHM along an axon is increased by 42.9%. Experimental validation showed that, when using two adjacent fibers instead of one, a 38.5 ± 2.2% (mean ± standard error of the mean) reduction in radiant exposure per pulse per fiber threshold at the fiber output (P = 7.3E-6) is measured, resulting in a reduction in peak temperature rise under each fiber of 23.5 ± 2.1% ( P = 9.3E-5) and 15.0 ± 2.4% ( P = 1.4E-3) and an increase in the FWHM of heating by 37.7 ± 6.4% ( P = 1E-3), 68.4 ± 5.2% ( P = 2.4E-5), and 51.9 ± 9.9% ( P = 1.7E-3) in three MRT slices. This study provides the first experimental evidence for a phenomenon during the heat block in which the temperature for inhibition is dependent on the BL. While more work is needed to further reduce the temperature during INI, the results highlight that spatial application of the temperature rise during INI must be considered. Optimized implementation of INI may leverage this cellular response to provide optical modulation of neural signals with lower temperatures over greater time periods, which may increase the utility of the technique for laboratory and clinical use. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study is to assess the hypothesis that the length of axon heated, defined here as block length (BL), affects the temperature required for thermal inhibition of action potential propagation applied using laser heating. The presence of such a phenomenon has implications for how this technique, called infrared neural inhibition (INI), may be applied in a clinically safe manner since it suggests that temperatures required for therapy may be reduced through the proper spatial application of light. Here, we validate the presence of this phenomenon by assessing how the peak temperatures during INI are reduced when two different BLs are applied using irradiation from either one or two adjacent optical fibers.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS
Assessment of the role of BL was carried out over two phases. First, a computational proof of concept was performed in the neural conduction simulation environment, NEURON, simulating the response of action potentials to increased temperatures applied at different full-width at half-maxima (FWHM) along axons. Second, ex vivo validation of these predictions was performed by measuring the radiant exposure, peak temperature rise, and FWHM of heat distributions associated with INI from one or two adjacent optical fibers. Electrophysiological assessment of radiant exposures at inhibition threshold were carried out in ex vivo Aplysia californica (sea slug) pleural abdominal nerves ( n = 6), an invertebrate with unmyelinated axons. Measurement of the maximum temperature rise required for induced heat block was performed in a water bath using a fine wire thermocouple. Finally, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) was performed on a nerve immersed in saline to assess the elevated temperature distribution at these radiant exposures.
RESULTS
Computational modeling in NEURON provided a theoretical proof of concept that the BL is an important factor contributing to the peak temperature required during neural heat block, predicting a 11.7% reduction in temperature rise when the FWHM along an axon is increased by 42.9%. Experimental validation showed that, when using two adjacent fibers instead of one, a 38.5 ± 2.2% (mean ± standard error of the mean) reduction in radiant exposure per pulse per fiber threshold at the fiber output (P = 7.3E-6) is measured, resulting in a reduction in peak temperature rise under each fiber of 23.5 ± 2.1% ( P = 9.3E-5) and 15.0 ± 2.4% ( P = 1.4E-3) and an increase in the FWHM of heating by 37.7 ± 6.4% ( P = 1E-3), 68.4 ± 5.2% ( P = 2.4E-5), and 51.9 ± 9.9% ( P = 1.7E-3) in three MRT slices.
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides the first experimental evidence for a phenomenon during the heat block in which the temperature for inhibition is dependent on the BL. While more work is needed to further reduce the temperature during INI, the results highlight that spatial application of the temperature rise during INI must be considered. Optimized implementation of INI may leverage this cellular response to provide optical modulation of neural signals with lower temperatures over greater time periods, which may increase the utility of the technique for laboratory and clinical use. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31347188
doi: 10.1002/lsm.23139
pmc: PMC6981060
mid: NIHMS1047850
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
259-275Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL126747
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : OT2 OD025307
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R56 NS087249
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R56 NS094651
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : T32 EB021937
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
J Neural Eng. 2012 Dec;9(6):066006
pubmed: 23186608
Int J Hyperthermia. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):267-94
pubmed: 12745972
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998 Feb;24(2):275-83
pubmed: 9550186
J Comp Neurol. 1986 Jan 15;243(3):335-46
pubmed: 3950079
Neurophotonics. 2014 Jul;1(1):011010
pubmed: 26157966
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2600
pubmed: 24009039
Neuromodulation. 2014 Apr;17(3):242-54; discussion 254-5
pubmed: 23924075
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 Jul;52(7):1323-32
pubmed: 16041996
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Mar;115(3):1436-45
pubmed: 26740534
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:181-90
pubmed: 23994125
J Neural Eng. 2008 Sep;5(3):287-309
pubmed: 18714126
Appl Opt. 2007 Nov 20;46(33):8118-33
pubmed: 18026551
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Mar;21(2):319-28
pubmed: 23476007
Opt Lett. 2005 Mar 1;30(5):504-6
pubmed: 15789717
J Physiol. 1949 Aug;109(1-2):240-9
pubmed: 15394322
Surg Clin North Am. 1992 Jun;72(3):531-58
pubmed: 1589829
Anal Chem. 2016 Jan 5;88(1):832-7
pubmed: 26624505
Pain. 2015 Apr;156(4):569-76
pubmed: 25785523
Appl Opt. 1973 Mar 1;12(3):555-63
pubmed: 20125343
J Biomed Opt. 2016 Jun 1;21(6):60505
pubmed: 27367249
Neuromodulation. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):363-9; discussion 369
pubmed: 23425338
J Intern Med. 2013 May;273(5):511-26
pubmed: 23331508
Pflugers Arch. 2018 May;470(5):717-731
pubmed: 29397424
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2004 May;42(3):394-406
pubmed: 15191086
Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 1;57(1):155-166
pubmed: 21513806
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993 Dec;40(12):1201-9
pubmed: 8125496
Neurosurgery. 2014 Jun;74(6):569-84; discussion 584-5
pubmed: 24618797
J Physiol. 2012 Feb 15;590(4):725-36
pubmed: 22144575
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 08;6(7):e1000850
pubmed: 20628619
Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27(4):320-43
pubmed: 21591897
J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):53-71
pubmed: 13278885
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1959 Aug 28;81:221-46
pubmed: 14405664
Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(1):48-55
pubmed: 14755424
J Neurophysiol. 1967 Nov;30(6):1263-87
pubmed: 6066444
J Pain Res. 2016 Jul 01;9:481-92
pubmed: 27445503
J Neural Eng. 2016 Jun;13(3):031003
pubmed: 27153566
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Jan;33(1):74-81
pubmed: 7891538
J Neurosurg. 1968 Jul;29(1):42-7
pubmed: 5674091
J Ther Ultrasound. 2016 Sep 05;4(1):22
pubmed: 27597889
Neurophotonics. 2015 Jan;2(1):015007
pubmed: 26157986
Ultrasonics. 2010 Feb;50(2):221-9
pubmed: 19818981
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012 Jun;59(6):1758-69
pubmed: 22510941
Clin J Pain. 2014 Jul;30(7):557-64
pubmed: 24281273
J Neural Eng. 2019 Jun;16(3):036020
pubmed: 30909171
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Sep;52(9):1518-22
pubmed: 16285450
Nat Photonics. 2010 Aug 15;4:623-626
pubmed: 21423854
Pain Physician. 2016 Jan;19(1):E33-54
pubmed: 26752493
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Dec;34(6):814-23
pubmed: 8598808
J Pain. 2009 Feb;10(2):113-30
pubmed: 19187889
J Neural Eng. 2015 Jun;12(3):036003
pubmed: 25834113
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183761
pubmed: 28837652
Biophys J. 2008 Apr 15;94(8):3159-66
pubmed: 18192375
Br J Anaesth. 1975 Nov;47(11):1123-33
pubmed: 1218139
J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:431-7
pubmed: 14079679
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):85-92
pubmed: 20083827
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:2777-80
pubmed: 19163281
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 12;7(1):3275
pubmed: 28607402
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Feb;27(2):376-90
pubmed: 18219673
J Neural Eng. 2012 Jun;9(3):036003
pubmed: 22505590
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Jan;41(1):117-9
pubmed: 19813186
Bioelectron Med (Lond). 2018 Jan;1(1):39-54
pubmed: 29480897
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):276-86
pubmed: 25581257
J Physiol. 1980 Jan;298:471-82
pubmed: 7359430
Neural Comput. 1997 Aug 15;9(6):1179-209
pubmed: 9248061
J Physiol. 2008 Feb 15;586(4):1089-103
pubmed: 18096592
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Apr;25(4):310-5
pubmed: 20049546