Treating Craniofacial Dysostoses with Hypertelorism by Monobloc Facial Bipartition Distraction: Surgical and Educational Videos.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
entrez:
27
7
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
12
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Simultaneously advancing and medializing the orbital segments in a stable bone bloc constitutes a major advancement in craniofacial surgery. Monobloc bipartition enables destigmatization of the syndromic face by correcting the abnormal orbital axis and interorbital distance. The authors stratified this complex surgical approach into five major steps to facilitate a holistic understanding of the surgical sequence. The rationale for latency and activation periods and the advantages and disadvantages of this technique are described.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31348356
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005859
pii: 00006534-201908000-00032
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
433-438Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Bradley JP, Gabbay JS, Taub PJ, et al. Monobloc advancement by distraction osteogenesis decreases morbidity and relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1585–1597.
Tessier P. Total osteotomy of the middle third of the face for faciostenosis or for sequelae of Le Fort 3 fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48:533–541.
Ponniah AJ, Witherow H, Richards R, Evans R, Hayward R, Dunaway D. Three-dimensional image analysis of facial skeletal changes after monobloc and bipartition distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:225–231.
Greig AV, Britto JA, Abela C, et al. Correcting the typical Apert face: Combining bipartition with monobloc distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:219e–230e.
Raposo-Amaral CE, Denadai R, Ghizoni E, Buzzo CL, Raposo-Amaral CA. Family of Crouzon syndrome represents the evolution of the frontofacial monobloc advancement technique: From immediate movement to monobloc distraction to monobloc bipartition distraction. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:1940–1943.
Raposo-Amaral CE, Neto JG, Denadai R, Raposo-Amaral CM, Raposo-Amaral CA. Patient-reported quality of life in highest-functioning Apert and Crouzon syndromes: A comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:182e–191e.
Al-Namnam NMN, Hariri F, Rahman ZAA. Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical management of syndromic craniosynostosis: A comprehensive review of published papers. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:353–366.
Bradley JP, Levitt A, Nguyen J, et al. Roman arch, keystone fixation for facial bipartition with monobloc distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1514–1523.
Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Yau TM, et al. The independent association of massive blood loss with mortality in cardiac surgery. Transfusion 2004;44:1453–1462.
Iannetti G, Ramieri V, Pagnoni M, Fadda MT, Cascone P. Le Fort III external midface distraction: Surgical outcomes and skeletal stability. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:896–900.
Shetye PR, Boutros S, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Midterm follow-up of midface distraction for syndromic craniosynostosis: A clinical and cephalometric study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1621–1632.