Neural correlates of proprioceptive upper limb position matching.
Adolescent
Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Brain Mapping
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials
/ physiology
Feedback, Physiological
Feedback, Sensory
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Motor Cortex
/ physiology
Proprioception
/ physiology
Robotics
Somatosensory Cortex
/ physiology
Upper Extremity
/ physiology
Visual Cortex
/ physiology
Young Adult
EEG
ERSP
proprioception
robotic assessment
μ band desynchronization
Journal
Human brain mapping
ISSN: 1097-0193
Titre abrégé: Hum Brain Mapp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9419065
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2019
01 11 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
revised:
15
07
2019
accepted:
16
07
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
15
4
2020
entrez:
27
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proprioceptive information allows humans to perform smooth coordinated movements by constantly updating one's mind with knowledge of the position of one's limbs in space. How this information is combined with other sensory modalities and centrally processed to form conscious perceptions of limb position remains relatively unknown. What has proven even more elusive is pinpointing the contribution of proprioception in cortical activity related to motion. This study addresses these gaps by examining electrocortical dynamics while participants performed an upper limb position matching task in two conditions, namely with proprioceptive feedback or with both visual and proprioceptive feedback. Specifically, we evaluated the reduction of the electroencephalographic power (desynchronization) in the μ frequency band (8-12 Hz), which is known to characterize the neural activation associated with motor control and behavior. We observed a stronger desynchronization in the left motor and somatosensory areas, contralateral to the moving limb while, parietal and occipital regions, identifying association and visual areas, respectively, exhibited a similar activation level in the two hemispheres. Pertaining to the influence of the two experimental conditions it affected only movement's offset, and precisely we found that when matching movements are performed relying only on proprioceptive information, a lower cortical activity is entailed. This effect was strongest in the visual and association areas, while there was a minor effect in the hand motor and somatosensory areas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31348604
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24739
pmc: PMC6865654
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4813-4826Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Brain Topogr. 2000 Spring;12(3):177-86
pubmed: 10791681
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1767-77
pubmed: 19460444
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42742
pubmed: 22880095
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 5;6(222):222ra19
pubmed: 24500407
J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Mar;5(1):80-90
pubmed: 30356896
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):31-42
pubmed: 16034570
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Jan;81(1):383-7
pubmed: 9914297
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Feb;73(2):820-35
pubmed: 7760137
J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 6;23(18):6982-92
pubmed: 12904459
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Feb;24(2):178-87
pubmed: 19794134
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):200-17
pubmed: 18647725
Ann Neurol. 1981 Oct;10(4):309-25
pubmed: 7032417
Nat Neurosci. 2003 May;6(5):448-50
pubmed: 12704393
Neuroimage. 1998 Nov;8(4):377-90
pubmed: 9811556
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;508:61-8
pubmed: 12171152
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 May;39(5):1929-1944
pubmed: 29359521
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 May;8(5):204-10
pubmed: 15120678
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Dec;25(3):668-77
pubmed: 16236487
Brain Topogr. 2003 Winter;16(2):95-9
pubmed: 14977202
Physiol Rev. 2012 Oct;92(4):1651-97
pubmed: 23073629
Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Jun;26(1-3):121-35
pubmed: 9202999
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2235-44
pubmed: 17138596
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan 1;117(1):117-122
pubmed: 27733598
Br J Med Psychol. 1954 Feb;45(1):24-39
pubmed: 13140843
Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Aug;12(4):919-930
pubmed: 28801769
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;85(6):2602-12
pubmed: 11387404
Neurology. 1979 Sep;29(9 Pt 1):1309-13
pubmed: 573414
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1951 Aug;14(3):187-204
pubmed: 14874132
Neuroscientist. 2004 Feb;10(1):73-82
pubmed: 14987450
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1462-70
pubmed: 22406556
Brain Res. 1974 May 17;71(2-3):285-96
pubmed: 4219742
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Feb;93(2):1020-34
pubmed: 15385595
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;106(4):283-96
pubmed: 9741757
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Nov 1;40(16):4813-4826
pubmed: 31348604
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;73(1):361-72
pubmed: 7714578
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Apr;86(4):283-93
pubmed: 7682932
Neurobiol Dis. 2015 Nov;83:191-8
pubmed: 25201560
Cortex. 2016 Jun;79:42-56
pubmed: 27085894
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 29;10:316
pubmed: 27445756
Neuroimage. 2002 Sep;17(1):461-8
pubmed: 12482098
Neuroimage. 1996 Oct;4(2):105-10
pubmed: 9345502
Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:955-971
pubmed: 30312939
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Jan;23(1):27-39
pubmed: 19114435
J Physiol. 2016 Feb 15;594(4):1037-49
pubmed: 26537335
J Neurophysiol. 1976 Mar;39(2):435-44
pubmed: 815518
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Apr;8(2):195-201
pubmed: 9635202
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Feb;15(2):131-40
pubmed: 15238440
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:303-30
pubmed: 9056716
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(3):308-19
pubmed: 12541142
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979 Feb;46(2):138-46
pubmed: 86421
Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Dec;13(6):1635-1649
pubmed: 31218533
Phys Life Rev. 2019 Oct;30:89-111
pubmed: 29903532
Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Jun;25(11):3476-87
pubmed: 17553017
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Nov;16(11):541-9
pubmed: 23031541
Technol Health Care. 2006;14(3):123-42
pubmed: 16971753
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;114(1):120-9
pubmed: 12495772
Pain. 1992 Jul;50(1):29-39
pubmed: 1513603
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Apr;33(4):895-908
pubmed: 21432946
Phys Ther. 2010 Aug;90(8):1176-84
pubmed: 20522675
Muscle Nerve. 2006 Nov;34(5):545-58
pubmed: 16897766
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;114(1):107-19
pubmed: 12495771
J Physiol. 2009 Sep 1;587(Pt 17):4139-46
pubmed: 19581378
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep;20(9):1637-55
pubmed: 18345992
Front Neurorobot. 2016 Oct 19;10:13
pubmed: 27807417
Neurosci Lett. 2002 Oct 4;331(1):29-32
pubmed: 12359316
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161155
pubmed: 27536882
Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Jun;26(1-3):31-49
pubmed: 9202993
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16344-52
pubmed: 22072686
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):417-9
pubmed: 17369825
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Dec;62:1-13
pubmed: 30172030
Br Med J. 1887 Nov 5;2(1401):985-90
pubmed: 20752083
J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(2):387-407
pubmed: 978533
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1355-64
pubmed: 10085361
Exp Neurol. 1975 Jan;46(1):178-86
pubmed: 1109336
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995 Feb;73(2):246-54
pubmed: 7621363