High perceived stress and social interaction behaviour among young adults. A study based on objective measures of face-to-face and smartphone interactions.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
23
08
2018
accepted:
03
06
2019
entrez:
27
7
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
19
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stress and mental health problems impede social functioning and may also complicate relationship formation with peers. The aim was to investigate whether high perceived stress among young adults is associated with social interaction behaviour both via face-to-face interaction and via smartphone interaction. The data was derived from the Copenhagen Network Study, where 535 first-year students (mean age 21.3, 77% male) self-reported on perceived stress at baseline and were subsequently followed for three months with continuous Bluetooth recordings of face-to-face interactions and smartphone interactions (calls and texts) measuring the network size, frequency, and duration of interactions. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between perceived stress (high/low) and social interactions adjusting for sex, age, and personality traits. Participants with high perceived stress were more likely to engage in a larger call and text network and have a higher call and text frequency compared to individuals with low perceived stress. We found a non-statistically significant tendency that participants with a high perceived stress level spend less time meeting face to face with peers. Stressed students engage in frequent smartphone interaction which may be explained by a social support seeking behaviour, or it may be that accommodating a large network via the smartphone is stress-inducing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31348787
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218429
pii: PONE-D-18-24834
pmc: PMC6660065
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0218429Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 07;9(7):e100915
pubmed: 24999984
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2011 Jul;24(4):407-19
pubmed: 21213153
Stress Health. 2018 Aug;34(3):347-358
pubmed: 29673047
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Jan;201(1):60-7
pubmed: 23274298
Am Psychol. 2004 Nov;59(8):676-684
pubmed: 15554821
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1429-37
pubmed: 19047530
Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):1-6
pubmed: 20158541
J Adolesc. 2015 Jan;38:27-37
pubmed: 25460677
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 May;16(5):290-304
pubmed: 25891510
J Health Soc Behav. 1991 Dec;32(4):408-23
pubmed: 1765630
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15274-8
pubmed: 19706491
Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):420
pubmed: 25665022
J Pers. 2010 Apr;78(2):509-38
pubmed: 20433629
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr 25;40(7):910-922
pubmed: 24769739
Horm Behav. 2016 Apr;80:92-102
pubmed: 26836773
Stress Health. 2017 Feb;33(1):14-23
pubmed: 26833698
PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 27;7(7):e1000316
pubmed: 20668659
Lancet. 2007 Apr 14;369(9569):1302-1313
pubmed: 17434406
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:293-319
pubmed: 17716090
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:313-32
pubmed: 27395342
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015 Sep 1;41(5):486-90
pubmed: 26111225
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 25;9(4):e95978
pubmed: 24770359