Maternal vegetable intake during and after pregnancy.
Employment
Maternity leave
Pregnancy
Vegetable intake
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jul 2019
26 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
13
12
2018
accepted:
04
06
2019
entrez:
28
7
2019
pubmed:
28
7
2019
medline:
21
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improved understanding of vegetable intake changes between pregnancy and postpartum may inform future intervention targets to establish healthy home food environments. Therefore, the goal of this study was to explore the changes in vegetable intake between pregnancy and the postnatal period and explore maternal and sociodemographic factors that are associated with these changes. We examined sociodemographic, dietary, and health characteristics of healthy mothers 18-43y from the prospective Infant Feeding Practices II cohort (n = 847) (2005-2012). Mothers completed a modified version of the diet history questionnaire, a food-frequency measure, developed by the National Cancer Institute. We created four categories of mothers, those that were: meeting vegetable recommendations post- but not prenatally (n = 121; improved intake), not meeting vegetable recommendations during pregnancy and postnatally (n = 370; stable inadequate), meeting recommendations pre- but not postnatally (n = 123; reduced intake), and meeting recommendations at both time points (n = 233; stable adequate). To make our results more relevant to public health recommendations, we were interested in comparing the improved vegetable intake group vs. stable inadequate vegetable intake group, as well as those that reduced their vegetable intake compared to the stable adequate vegetable intake group. Separate multivariable-adjusted logistic regression were used to examine sociodemographic predictors of improved vs. stable inadequate and reduced vs. stable adequate vegetable intake. Women with improved vegetable intake vs. stable inadequate smoked fewer cigarettes while women with reduced vegetable intake vs. stable adequate were more likely to experience less pregnancy weight gain. In adjusted models, employed women had greater odds of reduced vegetable intake (OR = 1.64 95% CI 1.14-2.36). In exploratory analyses, employment was associated with greater odds of reduced vegetable intake among low-income (OR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.03-3.1), but not higher income women (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 0.94-1.84). After further adjustment for paid maternity leave, employment was no longer associated with vegetable intake among lower income women (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.76-3.05). More women with reduced vs. stable adequate vegetable intake were lower income and worked full time. Improved access to paid maternity leave may help reduce disparities in vegetable quality between lower and higher income women.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Improved understanding of vegetable intake changes between pregnancy and postpartum may inform future intervention targets to establish healthy home food environments. Therefore, the goal of this study was to explore the changes in vegetable intake between pregnancy and the postnatal period and explore maternal and sociodemographic factors that are associated with these changes.
METHODS
METHODS
We examined sociodemographic, dietary, and health characteristics of healthy mothers 18-43y from the prospective Infant Feeding Practices II cohort (n = 847) (2005-2012). Mothers completed a modified version of the diet history questionnaire, a food-frequency measure, developed by the National Cancer Institute. We created four categories of mothers, those that were: meeting vegetable recommendations post- but not prenatally (n = 121; improved intake), not meeting vegetable recommendations during pregnancy and postnatally (n = 370; stable inadequate), meeting recommendations pre- but not postnatally (n = 123; reduced intake), and meeting recommendations at both time points (n = 233; stable adequate). To make our results more relevant to public health recommendations, we were interested in comparing the improved vegetable intake group vs. stable inadequate vegetable intake group, as well as those that reduced their vegetable intake compared to the stable adequate vegetable intake group. Separate multivariable-adjusted logistic regression were used to examine sociodemographic predictors of improved vs. stable inadequate and reduced vs. stable adequate vegetable intake.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Women with improved vegetable intake vs. stable inadequate smoked fewer cigarettes while women with reduced vegetable intake vs. stable adequate were more likely to experience less pregnancy weight gain. In adjusted models, employed women had greater odds of reduced vegetable intake (OR = 1.64 95% CI 1.14-2.36). In exploratory analyses, employment was associated with greater odds of reduced vegetable intake among low-income (OR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.03-3.1), but not higher income women (OR = 1.31; 95% CI 0.94-1.84). After further adjustment for paid maternity leave, employment was no longer associated with vegetable intake among lower income women (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 0.76-3.05).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
More women with reduced vs. stable adequate vegetable intake were lower income and worked full time. Improved access to paid maternity leave may help reduce disparities in vegetable quality between lower and higher income women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31349808
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2353-0
pii: 10.1186/s12884-019-2353-0
pmc: PMC6660649
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
267Références
Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19:41-62
pubmed: 10448516
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Feb;102(2):212-25
pubmed: 11846115
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002 Nov-Dec;34(6):310-5
pubmed: 12556269
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6):801-9
pubmed: 12570888
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(3):617-30
pubmed: 12570978
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Apr;7(2):295-302
pubmed: 15003137
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005 May-Jun;37(3):129-36
pubmed: 15904576
BMJ. 2005 Jun 11;330(7504):1357
pubmed: 15908441
Br J Nutr. 2007 Nov;98(5):1084-91
pubmed: 17521470
Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122 Suppl 2:S28-35
pubmed: 18829828
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;23(5):446-53
pubmed: 19689495
J Nutr. 2009 Oct;139(10):1956-63
pubmed: 19710161
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar;91(3):748-56
pubmed: 20053880
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Dec;110(12 Suppl):S38-51
pubmed: 21092767
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Dec;110(12 Suppl):S52-9
pubmed: 21092769
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Mar;111(3):401-7
pubmed: 21338739
Arch Iran Med. 2012 Aug;15(8):508-16
pubmed: 22827790
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Feb;113(2):297-306
pubmed: 23168270
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jun;67(6):670-9
pubmed: 23612514
Curr Biol. 2013 May 6;23(9):R401-8
pubmed: 23660363
J Obes. 2013;2013:525161
pubmed: 24062946
Scientifica (Cairo). 2013;2013:786409
pubmed: 24490111
Public Health Nutr. 2015 May;18(7):1187-96
pubmed: 25221910
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 Mar-Apr;47(2):181-7
pubmed: 25449828
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:10-9
pubmed: 25451579
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Apr;116(4):630-7
pubmed: 26198582
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Oct;102(4):873-80
pubmed: 26354533
Diabet Med. 2016 May;33(5):663-7
pubmed: 26872289
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;157:120-6
pubmed: 27082023
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Jul;40(7):1056-62
pubmed: 27133623
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:106-13
pubmed: 27179936
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):316-327
pubmed: 27903310
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:19-31
pubmed: 28179065
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):107
pubmed: 28376732
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Jan;14(1):
pubmed: 28464549
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e017753
pubmed: 29138203
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Apr;65(4 Suppl):1220S-1228S; discussion 1229S-1231S
pubmed: 9094926