Eligibility and subsequent burden of cardiovascular disease of four strategies for blood pressure-lowering treatment: a retrospective cohort study.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 08 2019
Historique:
received: 20 02 2019
revised: 24 05 2019
accepted: 04 06 2019
pubmed: 30 7 2019
medline: 15 10 2019
entrez: 30 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Worldwide treatment recommendations for lowering blood pressure continue to be guided predominantly by blood pressure thresholds, despite strong evidence that the benefits of blood pressure reduction are observed in patients across the blood pressure spectrum. In this study, we aimed to investigate the implications of alternative strategies for offering blood pressure treatment, using the UK as an illustrative example. We did a retrospective cohort study in primary care patients aged 30-79 years without cardiovascular disease, using data from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality. We assessed and compared four different strategies to determine eligibility for treatment: using 2011 UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline, or proposed 2019 NICE guideline, or blood pressure alone (threshold ≥140/90 mm Hg), or predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk alone (QRISK2 score ≥10%). Patients were followed up until the earliest occurrence of a cardiovascular disease diagnosis, death, or end of follow-up period (March 31, 2016). For each strategy, we estimated the proportion of patients eligible for treatment and number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented with treatment. We then estimated eligibility and number of events that would occur during 10 years in the UK general population. Between Jan 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, 1 222 670 patients in the cohort were followed up for a median of 4·3 years (IQR 2·5-5·2). 271 963 (22·2%) patients were eligible for treatment under the 2011 NICE guideline, 327 429 (26·8%) under the proposed 2019 NICE guideline, 481 859 (39·4%) on the basis of a blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg or higher, and 357 840 (29·3%) on the basis of a QRISK2 threshold of 10% or higher. During follow-up, 32 183 patients were diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (overall rate 7·1 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 7·0-7·2). Cardiovascular event rates in patients eligible for each strategy were 15·2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 15·0-15·5) under the 2011 NICE guideline, 14·9 (14·7-15·1) under the proposed 2019 NICE guideline, 11·4 (11·3-11·6) with blood pressure threshold alone, and 16·9 (16·7-17·1) with QRISK2 threshold alone. Scaled to the UK population, we estimated that 233 152 events would be avoided under the 2011 NICE guideline (28 patients needed to treat for 10 years to avoid one event), 270 233 under the 2019 NICE guideline (29 patients), 301 523 using a blood pressure threshold (38 patients), and 322 921 using QRISK2 threshold (27 patients). A cardiovascular risk-based strategy (QRISK2 ≥10%) could prevent over a third more cardiovascular disease events than the 2011 NICE guideline and a fifth more than the 2019 NICE guideline, with similar efficiency regarding number treated per event avoided. National Institute for Health Research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Worldwide treatment recommendations for lowering blood pressure continue to be guided predominantly by blood pressure thresholds, despite strong evidence that the benefits of blood pressure reduction are observed in patients across the blood pressure spectrum. In this study, we aimed to investigate the implications of alternative strategies for offering blood pressure treatment, using the UK as an illustrative example.
METHODS
We did a retrospective cohort study in primary care patients aged 30-79 years without cardiovascular disease, using data from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality. We assessed and compared four different strategies to determine eligibility for treatment: using 2011 UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline, or proposed 2019 NICE guideline, or blood pressure alone (threshold ≥140/90 mm Hg), or predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk alone (QRISK2 score ≥10%). Patients were followed up until the earliest occurrence of a cardiovascular disease diagnosis, death, or end of follow-up period (March 31, 2016). For each strategy, we estimated the proportion of patients eligible for treatment and number of cardiovascular events that could be prevented with treatment. We then estimated eligibility and number of events that would occur during 10 years in the UK general population.
FINDINGS
Between Jan 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, 1 222 670 patients in the cohort were followed up for a median of 4·3 years (IQR 2·5-5·2). 271 963 (22·2%) patients were eligible for treatment under the 2011 NICE guideline, 327 429 (26·8%) under the proposed 2019 NICE guideline, 481 859 (39·4%) on the basis of a blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg or higher, and 357 840 (29·3%) on the basis of a QRISK2 threshold of 10% or higher. During follow-up, 32 183 patients were diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (overall rate 7·1 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 7·0-7·2). Cardiovascular event rates in patients eligible for each strategy were 15·2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 15·0-15·5) under the 2011 NICE guideline, 14·9 (14·7-15·1) under the proposed 2019 NICE guideline, 11·4 (11·3-11·6) with blood pressure threshold alone, and 16·9 (16·7-17·1) with QRISK2 threshold alone. Scaled to the UK population, we estimated that 233 152 events would be avoided under the 2011 NICE guideline (28 patients needed to treat for 10 years to avoid one event), 270 233 under the 2019 NICE guideline (29 patients), 301 523 using a blood pressure threshold (38 patients), and 322 921 using QRISK2 threshold (27 patients).
INTERPRETATION
A cardiovascular risk-based strategy (QRISK2 ≥10%) could prevent over a third more cardiovascular disease events than the 2011 NICE guideline and a fifth more than the 2019 NICE guideline, with similar efficiency regarding number treated per event avoided.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health Research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31353050
pii: S0140-6736(19)31359-5
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31359-5
pmc: PMC6717081
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antihypertensive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

663-671

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1575-85
pubmed: 20228401
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 08;8:CD011575
pubmed: 28787537
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):827-36
pubmed: 26050254
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Sep;38(3):e392-e399
pubmed: 26547088
Circulation. 2005 Dec 6;112(23):3569-76
pubmed: 16330698
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 21;4(9):e002126
pubmed: 26391134
Circulation. 2013 Nov 19;128(21):2309-17
pubmed: 24190955
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 01;12:398
pubmed: 22657090
J Hypertens. 2018 Oct;36(10):1953-2041
pubmed: 30234752
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Oct;15(10):742-7
pubmed: 24088283
Hypertension. 2009 Dec;54(6):1423-8
pubmed: 19858407
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967
pubmed: 26724178
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Oct;23(5):189-190
pubmed: 29794113
Circulation. 2016 Mar 1;133(9):840-8
pubmed: 26762520
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):1264
pubmed: 30442122
BMJ. 2011 Aug 25;343:d4891
pubmed: 21868454
BMJ Open. 2014 May 15;4(5):e004812
pubmed: 24833688
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 20;15(3):e1002538
pubmed: 29558462
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665
pubmed: 19454737
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1121-3
pubmed: 18480116
Lancet. 2014 Aug 16;384(9943):591-598
pubmed: 25131978
Lancet. 2005 Jan 29-Feb 4;365(9457):434-41
pubmed: 15680460
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2889-934
pubmed: 24239923
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324
pubmed: 29133354
BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):680-5
pubmed: 10710577
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 1;178(4):575
pubmed: 29610880
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(11):NP1-NP96
pubmed: 27353126
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):28-36
pubmed: 29131895
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1475-82
pubmed: 18573856
BMJ. 2013 May 20;346:f2350
pubmed: 23692896
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):435-43
pubmed: 26559744
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16
pubmed: 26551272

Auteurs

Emily Herrett (E)

Department of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: emily.herrett@lshtm.ac.uk.

Sarah Gadd (S)

Department of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Rod Jackson (R)

Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Krishnan Bhaskaran (K)

Department of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Elizabeth Williamson (E)

Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK.

Tjeerd van Staa (T)

Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Reecha Sofat (R)

Institute of Health Informatics University College London, London, UK.

Adam Timmis (A)

Barts Heart Centre, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.

Liam Smeeth (L)

Department of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH