Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Databases, Factual
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Female
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
/ agonists
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ adverse effects
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Propensity Score
Risk Factors
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
United States
/ epidemiology
Urinary Tract Infections
/ chemically induced
Journal
Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 08 2019
20 08 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
7
2019
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
30
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prior studies evaluating risk for severe urinary tract infections (UTIs) with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have reported conflicting findings. To assess whether patients initiating use of SGLT-2 inhibitors were at increased risk for severe UTI events compared with those initiating use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists. Population-based cohort study. 2 large, U.S.-based databases of commercial claims (March 2013 to September 2015). Within each database, 2 cohorts were created and matched 1:1 on propensity score. Patients were aged 18 years or older, had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and were initiating use of SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors (cohort 1) or GLP-1 agonists (cohort 2). The primary outcome was a severe UTI event, defined as a hospitalization for primary UTI, sepsis with UTI, or pyelonephritis; the secondary outcome was outpatient UTI treated with antibiotics. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated in each propensity score-matched cohort, with adjustment for more than 90 baseline characteristics. After 1:1 matching on propensity score, 123 752 patients were identified in cohort 1 and 111 978 in cohort 2 in the 2 databases. In cohort 1, persons newly receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors had 61 severe UTI events (incidence rate [IR] per 1000 person-years, 1.76), compared with 57 events in the DPP-4 inhibitor group (IR, 1.77) (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.41]). In cohort 2, those receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors had 73 events (IR, 2.15), compared with 87 events in the GLP-1 agonist group (IR, 2.96) (HR, 0.72 [CI, 0.53 to 0.99]). Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses; within several subgroups of age, sex, and frailty; and for canagliflozin and dapagliflozin individually. In addition, SGLT-2 inhibitors were not associated with increased risk for outpatient UTIs (cohort 1: HR, 0.96 [CI, 0.89 to 1.04]; cohort 2: HR, 0.91 [CI, 0.84 to 0.99]). Generalizability of the study findings may be limited to patients with commercial insurance. In a large cohort of patients seen in routine clinical practice, risk for severe and nonsevere UTI events among those initiating SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy was similar to that among patients initiating treatment with other second-line antidiabetic medications. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics.
Sections du résumé
Background
Prior studies evaluating risk for severe urinary tract infections (UTIs) with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have reported conflicting findings.
Objective
To assess whether patients initiating use of SGLT-2 inhibitors were at increased risk for severe UTI events compared with those initiating use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists.
Design
Population-based cohort study.
Setting
2 large, U.S.-based databases of commercial claims (March 2013 to September 2015).
Participants
Within each database, 2 cohorts were created and matched 1:1 on propensity score. Patients were aged 18 years or older, had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and were initiating use of SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors (cohort 1) or GLP-1 agonists (cohort 2).
Measurements
The primary outcome was a severe UTI event, defined as a hospitalization for primary UTI, sepsis with UTI, or pyelonephritis; the secondary outcome was outpatient UTI treated with antibiotics. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated in each propensity score-matched cohort, with adjustment for more than 90 baseline characteristics.
Results
After 1:1 matching on propensity score, 123 752 patients were identified in cohort 1 and 111 978 in cohort 2 in the 2 databases. In cohort 1, persons newly receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors had 61 severe UTI events (incidence rate [IR] per 1000 person-years, 1.76), compared with 57 events in the DPP-4 inhibitor group (IR, 1.77) (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.41]). In cohort 2, those receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors had 73 events (IR, 2.15), compared with 87 events in the GLP-1 agonist group (IR, 2.96) (HR, 0.72 [CI, 0.53 to 0.99]). Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses; within several subgroups of age, sex, and frailty; and for canagliflozin and dapagliflozin individually. In addition, SGLT-2 inhibitors were not associated with increased risk for outpatient UTIs (cohort 1: HR, 0.96 [CI, 0.89 to 1.04]; cohort 2: HR, 0.91 [CI, 0.84 to 0.99]).
Limitation
Generalizability of the study findings may be limited to patients with commercial insurance.
Conclusion
In a large cohort of patients seen in routine clinical practice, risk for severe and nonsevere UTI events among those initiating SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy was similar to that among patients initiating treatment with other second-line antidiabetic medications.
Primary Funding Source
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31357213
pii: 2739786
doi: 10.7326/M18-3136
pmc: PMC6989379
mid: NIHMS1046584
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
89750-14-1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
248-256Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K08 AG051187
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K08 AG055670
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1281-7
pubmed: 15758783
Clin Ther. 1998;20 Suppl C:C40-4
pubmed: 9915089
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Jun;19(6):539-45
pubmed: 12135845
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001 Apr;17(4):287-92
pubmed: 11295410
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111
pubmed: 26061376
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jul-Aug;55(1):145-7
pubmed: 21963175
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424
pubmed: 21818162
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Aug;21(2):316-22
pubmed: 8562738
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 May;4(5):411-9
pubmed: 27009625
J Med Microbiol. 1999 Jun;48(6):535-539
pubmed: 10359302
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):323-34
pubmed: 27299675
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Feb;21(2):434-438
pubmed: 30207042
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;130:180-185
pubmed: 28646701
Circulation. 2017 Jul 18;136(3):249-259
pubmed: 28522450
Stat Med. 2014 May 10;33(10):1685-99
pubmed: 24323618
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Mar;19(3):348-355
pubmed: 27862830
BMJ. 2018 Feb 6;360:k119
pubmed: 29437648
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1271-1276
pubmed: 30165612
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):974-984
pubmed: 29206336
Epidemiology. 2017 Mar;28(2):249-257
pubmed: 27922533
Acta Diabetol. 2018 May;55(5):503-514
pubmed: 29484489
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):980-987
pubmed: 29244057
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2:69-80
pubmed: 22552982
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 20;159(4):262-74
pubmed: 24026259
Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:255-70
pubmed: 25341005