Evaluation of cartilage coverage with magnetic resonance imaging in residual dysplasia and its impact on surgical timing.
Acetabulum
/ diagnostic imaging
Age Factors
Cartilage
/ diagnostic imaging
Child
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Dislocation, Congenital
/ diagnosis
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Patient Selection
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnosis
Radiography
/ methods
Reoperation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Time-to-Treatment
Acetabular cartilage
Developmental dysplasia of the hip
Magnetic resonance
Posteromedial limited approach
Residual acetabular dysplasia
Journal
Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica
ISSN: 2589-1294
Titre abrégé: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 9424806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
09
01
2019
revised:
03
05
2019
accepted:
26
05
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
1
2
2020
entrez:
31
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to measure the cartilaginous coverage of the acetabulum using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to analyze its effect on the timing and necessity of secondary operations in residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD). The MRI results of 33 children (30 girls and 3 boys) aged between 5 and 9 years who were operated on unilaterally via a posteromedial limited approach were compared with the radiographical findings of acetabular dysplasia at follow-up. The acetabular index (AI) and the center-edge (CE) angles were measured. MRI was used to measure the osseous acetabular index (OAI), cartilage acetabular index (CAI), and cartilaginous center-edge angles (CCE). The Children's Hospital's Oakland Hip Evaluation Score (CHOHES) was used for the assessment of clinical and functional results. The Severin scoring system was used to evaluate the radiographic results. The Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation tests were used for statistical analysis. In all, 30 (90.9%) girls and 3 (9.1%) boys with an average age of 7.4 years (range: 5-9 years) and a mean follow-up period of 6.1 years (range: 4-8 years) were included. While there was a significant difference between non-dislocated hips and operated hips in 3 measurements (AI, Wiberg CE, and Ogata CE) using X-rays (p < 0.05), no significant difference was found in the MRI measurements (OAI, CAI, and CCE) (p > 0.05). The CAI values were lower than the AI measured on X-ray (p = 0.035). The mean CCE was higher than the mean CE (p = 0.022). The mean CHOHES score was 83.1 (range: 52-100) and the score of 62% patients was above 90. There was no significant difference in terms of CHOHES score according to age at the time of operation (p = 0.43). Three (9.1%) patients were Severin class I, 8 (24.3%) patients were class II, 12 (36.3%) patients were class III and 10 (30.3%) patients were class IV. There was no correlation between preoperative hip dislocation and Severin score (p = 0.056). No significant difference was found between the ambulatory and non-ambulatory groups in terms of Severin classification (p = 0.063). Cartilaginous acetabulum should be taken into account in RAD measurements. MRI may be a more appropriate option for the evaluation of acetabular cartilaginous coverage in the evaluation of RAD and the decision to perform surgery, though X-rays are currently the most used method. The results revealed no effect on functional or radiological scores as a result of being of walking age. Level III, Diagnostic Study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31358402
pii: S1017-995X(19)30025-2
doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.05.004
pmc: PMC6819792
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
351-355Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6):701-8
pubmed: 11097240
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(5):478-84
pubmed: 25264556
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Apr;(265):207-17
pubmed: 2009660
Skeletal Radiol. 2002 Jan;31(1):25-9
pubmed: 11807589
Hip Int. 2018 May;28(3):309-314
pubmed: 29048695
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2019 Mar;28(2):115-121
pubmed: 30234700
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(5):518-23
pubmed: 18580365
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014 May;23(3):237-43
pubmed: 24394595
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Feb;89(2):230-5
pubmed: 17322441
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Sep;(119):99-106
pubmed: 954330
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1369-75
pubmed: 16003666
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Aug;86(6):876-86
pubmed: 15330030
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017 Jul;26(4):344-349
pubmed: 27379671
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Nov;70(5):733-6
pubmed: 3192570