Preeclampsia and risk of end stage kidney disease: A Swedish nationwide cohort study.
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
04
03
2019
accepted:
28
06
2019
entrez:
31
7
2019
pubmed:
31
7
2019
medline:
20
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preeclampsia has been suggested to increase the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); however, most studies were unable to adjust for potential confounders including pre-existing comorbidities such as renal disease and cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to examine the association between preeclampsia and the risk of ESKD in healthy women, while taking into account pre-existing comorbidity and potential confounders. Using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MBR), women who had singleton live births in Sweden between 1982 and 2012, including those who had preeclampsia, were identified. Women with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD), CVD, hypertension, or diabetes prior to the first pregnancy were excluded. The outcome was a diagnosis of ESKD, identified from the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR) from January 1, 1991, onwards along with the specified cause of renal disease. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to examine the association between preeclampsia and ESKD adjusting for several potential confounders: maternal age, body mass index (BMI), education, native country, and smoking. This analysis accounts for differential follow-up among women because women had different lengths of follow-up time. We performed subgroup analyses according to preterm preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA), and women who had 2 pregnancies with preeclampsia in both. The cohort consisted of 1,366,441 healthy women who had 2,665,320 singleton live births in Sweden between 1982 and 2012. At the first pregnancy, women's mean (SD) age and BMI were 27.8 (5.13) and 23.4 (4.03), respectively, 15.2% were smokers, and 80.7% were native Swedish. The overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 7.4 years (3.2-17.4) and 16.4 years (10.3-22.0) among women with ESKD diagnosis. During the study period, 67,273 (4.9%) women having 74,648 (2.8% of all pregnancies) singleton live births had preeclampsia, and 410 women developed ESKD with an incidence rate of 1.85 per 100,000 person-years. There was an association between preeclampsia and ESKD in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.93-6.33; p < 0.001), which remained in the extensively adjusted (HR = 4.96, 95% CI 3.89-6.32, p < 0.001) models. Women who had preterm preeclampsia (adjusted HR = 9.19; 95% CI 5.16-15.61, p < 0.001) and women who had preeclampsia in 2 pregnancies (adjusted HR = 7.13, 95% CI 3.12-16.31, p < 0.001) had the highest risk of ESKD compared with women with no preeclampsia. Considering this was an observational cohort study, and although we accounted for several potential confounders, residual confounding cannot be ruled out. The present findings suggest that women with preeclampsia and no major comorbidities before their first pregnancy are at a 5-fold increased risk of ESKD compared with parous women with no preeclampsia; however, the absolute risk of ESKD among women with preeclampsia remains small. Preeclampsia should be considered as an important risk factor for subsequent ESKD. Whether screening and/or preventive strategies will reduce the risk of ESKD in women with adverse pregnancy outcomes is worthy of further investigation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Preeclampsia has been suggested to increase the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); however, most studies were unable to adjust for potential confounders including pre-existing comorbidities such as renal disease and cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to examine the association between preeclampsia and the risk of ESKD in healthy women, while taking into account pre-existing comorbidity and potential confounders.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MBR), women who had singleton live births in Sweden between 1982 and 2012, including those who had preeclampsia, were identified. Women with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD), CVD, hypertension, or diabetes prior to the first pregnancy were excluded. The outcome was a diagnosis of ESKD, identified from the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR) from January 1, 1991, onwards along with the specified cause of renal disease. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to examine the association between preeclampsia and ESKD adjusting for several potential confounders: maternal age, body mass index (BMI), education, native country, and smoking. This analysis accounts for differential follow-up among women because women had different lengths of follow-up time. We performed subgroup analyses according to preterm preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA), and women who had 2 pregnancies with preeclampsia in both. The cohort consisted of 1,366,441 healthy women who had 2,665,320 singleton live births in Sweden between 1982 and 2012. At the first pregnancy, women's mean (SD) age and BMI were 27.8 (5.13) and 23.4 (4.03), respectively, 15.2% were smokers, and 80.7% were native Swedish. The overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 7.4 years (3.2-17.4) and 16.4 years (10.3-22.0) among women with ESKD diagnosis. During the study period, 67,273 (4.9%) women having 74,648 (2.8% of all pregnancies) singleton live births had preeclampsia, and 410 women developed ESKD with an incidence rate of 1.85 per 100,000 person-years. There was an association between preeclampsia and ESKD in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.93-6.33; p < 0.001), which remained in the extensively adjusted (HR = 4.96, 95% CI 3.89-6.32, p < 0.001) models. Women who had preterm preeclampsia (adjusted HR = 9.19; 95% CI 5.16-15.61, p < 0.001) and women who had preeclampsia in 2 pregnancies (adjusted HR = 7.13, 95% CI 3.12-16.31, p < 0.001) had the highest risk of ESKD compared with women with no preeclampsia. Considering this was an observational cohort study, and although we accounted for several potential confounders, residual confounding cannot be ruled out.
CONCLUSIONS
The present findings suggest that women with preeclampsia and no major comorbidities before their first pregnancy are at a 5-fold increased risk of ESKD compared with parous women with no preeclampsia; however, the absolute risk of ESKD among women with preeclampsia remains small. Preeclampsia should be considered as an important risk factor for subsequent ESKD. Whether screening and/or preventive strategies will reduce the risk of ESKD in women with adverse pregnancy outcomes is worthy of further investigation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31361741
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002875
pii: PMEDICINE-D-19-00798
pmc: PMC6667103
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1002875Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: ME has participated in an advisory board meeting (Astellas) and has received payment for lectures by Astellas in the field of renal anemia. LCK is a minority shareholder in Metabolomic Diagnostics, a company which has licenced IP pertaining to the early pregnancy prediction of biomarkers to predict pre-eclampsia. LCK has also given talks about pre-eclampsia at symposia sponsored by Roche and Alere.
Références
Kidney Int. 2015 Nov;88(5):950-7
pubmed: 26221752
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Nov;7(11):1819-26
pubmed: 22956264
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Mar;14(3):203-210
pubmed: 29380816
Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):681-90
pubmed: 23401113
Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2003 Jan;10(1):3-14
pubmed: 12616458
CMAJ. 2013 Feb 19;185(3):207-13
pubmed: 23339156
Clin Sci (Lond). 2016 Jul 1;130(14):1147-63
pubmed: 27252402
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Jul;13:291-310
pubmed: 29803330
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1888-1917
pubmed: 28434650
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jul;8(7):1126-34
pubmed: 23723340
Pharmacol Rev. 2018 Apr;70(2):348-383
pubmed: 29507103
JAMA. 2001 Jul 25;286(4):421-6
pubmed: 11466120
BJOG. 2004 Feb;111(2):164-9
pubmed: 14723755
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014 Apr;4(2):97-104
pubmed: 26104417
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 May;71(5):619-626
pubmed: 29289477
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999 May;14(5):1129-32
pubmed: 10344350
Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(11):659-67
pubmed: 19504049
BMJ. 2009 Jun 18;338:b2255
pubmed: 19541696
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Sep;40(9):1129-1138
pubmed: 29934233
Clin Nephrol. 2012 Sep;78(3):241-9
pubmed: 22874114
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e92693
pubmed: 24664365
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Mar;14(3):151-164
pubmed: 29355169
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jul;6(7):1722-30
pubmed: 21734088
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Apr;69(4):498-505
pubmed: 27707553
Inflamm Res. 2015 Jun;64(6):433-9
pubmed: 25917045
Kidney Int. 2005 Jun;67(6):2101-13
pubmed: 15882253
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012 Feb 21;8(5):293-300
pubmed: 22349487
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Jun 1;147(11):1062-70
pubmed: 9620050
Ann Anat. 2014 Sep;196(5):268-77
pubmed: 24954650
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1747-55
pubmed: 23683641
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;31(2):125-36
pubmed: 26769609
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):147.e1-8
pubmed: 24060448
J Intern Med. 2010 Nov;268(5):456-67
pubmed: 20809922
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1026-39
pubmed: 20346562
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015 Apr 15;308(8):F824-31
pubmed: 25694481
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;102(11):876-81
pubmed: 8534622
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):232-40
pubmed: 25492254
Kidney Int. 2006 Aug;70(3):578-84
pubmed: 16788693
Lancet. 2010 Aug 21;376(9741):631-44
pubmed: 20598363
Acta Paediatr. 1996 Jul;85(7):843-8
pubmed: 8819552
N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 21;359(8):800-9
pubmed: 18716297