Is the introduction of violence and injury observatories associated with a reduction in violence-related injury in adult populations? A systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 07 2019
Historique:
entrez: 3 8 2019
pubmed: 3 8 2019
medline: 10 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to summarise the results from existing studies reporting on the effectiveness of the introduction of violence and injury observatories (VIOs). This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study. We searched multiple electronic databases including but not limited to PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, Cochrane Collaboration, Campbell Collaboration and Web of Knowledge. We included non-randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, controlled before-and-after studies and cross-sectional studies. We sought to include studies performed in any country and published in any language. The primary outcome was homicide, while the secondary outcome was assault. We searched a number of databases, supplemented by searches in grey literature including technical reports. Searches comprised studies from January 1990 to October 2018. Of 3105 potentially relevant unique citations from all literature searches, 3 empirical studies and 4 technical reports met our inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in the UK (n=3), Colombia (n=2), Brazil (n=1) and Uruguay (n=1). Subgroup analyses according to the two types of models implemented, the VIO and the injury surveillance system (ISS), provided evidence for an association between implementing the VIO model and a reduction in homicide count in high-violence settings (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.06; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.19; four studies), while the introduction of ISS showed significant results in reducing assault (IRR=0.80; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.91; three studies). This systematic review provides the best evidence available for the effectiveness of the introduction of VIOs and ISSs in reducing violence outcomes in adults in high-violence settings. The implementation of VIOs should be considered in high-violence communities where reduction in homicide rates is desired. CRD42014009818.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31371289
pii: bmjopen-2018-027977
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027977
pmc: PMC6678008
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e027977

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012 Nov;32(5):321-9
pubmed: 23338688
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):12-8
pubmed: 20698919
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2007 Jun;14(2):77-84
pubmed: 17510843
Emerg Med J. 2013 Dec;30(12):1020-3
pubmed: 23184923
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2008 Dec;24(6):379-89
pubmed: 19178777
S Afr Med J. 2003 Sep;93(9):682-8
pubmed: 14635557
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2010 Sep;17(3):177-85
pubmed: 20373194
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Dec;17(12):3209-18
pubmed: 23175397
Am J Ind Med. 2011 Dec;54(12):925-34
pubmed: 21739469
BMJ. 2011 Jun 16;342:d3313
pubmed: 21680632
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Nov;27(11):2135-42
pubmed: 22124491
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 21;5(7):e007073
pubmed: 26198425
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 22;7(12):e016485
pubmed: 29275338
Trop Med Int Health. 2011 Apr;16(4):439-46
pubmed: 21284789
Inj Prev. 1999 Jun;5(2):136-41
pubmed: 10385835
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6
pubmed: 21208779
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(5):357-64
pubmed: 12077610
J Urban Health. 2015 Jun;92(3):422-45
pubmed: 25758599
J Emerg Nurs. 2006 Feb;32(1):12-6
pubmed: 16439281
Inj Prev. 2012 Oct;18(5):315-20
pubmed: 22210640
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 07;8(11):e79840
pubmed: 24244569
Inj Control Saf Promot. 2002 Dec;9(4):241-7
pubmed: 12613103
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):e85319
pubmed: 24465534

Auteurs

Ardil Jabar (A)

School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Francisco Fong (F)

School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Monica Chavira (M)

College of Health Sciences, University of Texas, El Paso, Texas, USA.

Maria Teresa Cerqueira (MT)

United States-Mexico Border Office, Pan American Health Organization, El Paso, Texas, USA.

Dylan Barth (D)

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.

Richard Matzopoulos (R)

School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Mark E Engel (ME)

Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH