Community-Academic Partnerships to Reduce Cancer Inequities: The ChicagoCHEC Community Engagement Core.
Biomedical Research
/ organization & administration
Cancer Care Facilities
/ organization & administration
Capacity Building
/ organization & administration
Chicago
Community Participation
Community-Institutional Relations
Cooperative Behavior
Cultural Diversity
Early Detection of Cancer
Health Education
/ organization & administration
Health Equity
/ organization & administration
Health Occupations
/ education
Humans
Minority Groups
Poverty
Universities
Journal
Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
ISSN: 1557-055X
Titre abrégé: Prog Community Health Partnersh
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101273946
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
6
8
2019
pubmed:
6
8
2019
medline:
29
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 2015, Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) was formed to address cancer inequities. The Community Engagement Core (CEC) is one of the key components aimed at establishing meaningful partnerships between the academic institutions and the community. Herein, we describe ChicagoCHEC CEC processes, challenges, opportunities, successes, and preliminary evaluation results. CEC stresses participatory and empowerment approaches in all aspects of ChicagoCHEC work. Evaluation processes were conducted to assess, report back, and respond to community needs and to evaluate the strength of the partnership. CEC has facilitated meaningful community integration and involvement in all ChicagoCHEC work. The partnership resulted in annual cancer symposium; more than 50 outreach and education activities, including cancer screening and referrals; the development of health resources; and providing expertise in culturally and health literacy appropriate research targeting minorities. Preliminary partnership evaluation results show that ChicagoCHEC researchers and community partners have developed trust and cohesiveness and value the community benefits resulting from the partnership. CEC is essential in achieving research objectives following community participatory action research (CPAR) approaches. Some key lessons learned include 1) the need for clear, honest, and open channels of communication not only among the three participating academic institutions, but also among the community partners, 2) transparent operational processes, and 3) mutual trust and understanding regarding the different cultures, structure, foci and processes, expectations at each institution and partnering organization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In 2015, Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) was formed to address cancer inequities. The Community Engagement Core (CEC) is one of the key components aimed at establishing meaningful partnerships between the academic institutions and the community. Herein, we describe ChicagoCHEC CEC processes, challenges, opportunities, successes, and preliminary evaluation results.
METHODS
CEC stresses participatory and empowerment approaches in all aspects of ChicagoCHEC work. Evaluation processes were conducted to assess, report back, and respond to community needs and to evaluate the strength of the partnership.
RESULTS
CEC has facilitated meaningful community integration and involvement in all ChicagoCHEC work. The partnership resulted in annual cancer symposium; more than 50 outreach and education activities, including cancer screening and referrals; the development of health resources; and providing expertise in culturally and health literacy appropriate research targeting minorities. Preliminary partnership evaluation results show that ChicagoCHEC researchers and community partners have developed trust and cohesiveness and value the community benefits resulting from the partnership.
CONCLUSIONS
CEC is essential in achieving research objectives following community participatory action research (CPAR) approaches. Some key lessons learned include 1) the need for clear, honest, and open channels of communication not only among the three participating academic institutions, but also among the community partners, 2) transparent operational processes, and 3) mutual trust and understanding regarding the different cultures, structure, foci and processes, expectations at each institution and partnering organization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31378729
pii: S1557055X19500031
doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0032
pmc: PMC6984343
mid: NIHMS1063183
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21-37Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA202995
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA202997
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U54 CA203000
Pays : United States
Références
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Spring;9(1):17-29
pubmed: 25981421
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1:S12-8
pubmed: 20147660
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8 Suppl):2023-33
pubmed: 16958026
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):5-13
pubmed: 31378727
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jul;7(3):312-23
pubmed: 16760238
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):163-214
pubmed: 26994713
Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):417-32
pubmed: 10146478
Ochsner J. 1999 Apr;1(2):52-7
pubmed: 21845119