Clinical and pharmacokinetics equivalence of multiple doses of levodopa benserazide generic formulation vs the originator (Madopar).
Adult
Aged
Benserazide
/ administration & dosage
Cross-Over Studies
Dopamine Agents
/ administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Drug Combinations
Drugs, Generic
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Levodopa
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Parkinson Disease
/ blood
Severity of Illness Index
Treatment Outcome
generic formulation
noninferiority
originator
pharmacokinetic equivalence
Journal
British journal of clinical pharmacology
ISSN: 1365-2125
Titre abrégé: Br J Clin Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503323
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
11
06
2018
revised:
15
07
2019
accepted:
26
07
2019
pubmed:
6
8
2019
medline:
29
9
2020
entrez:
6
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While several generic preparations of levodopa/carbidopa and levodopa/benserazide (LBD) are currently available, pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence and therapeutic equivalence studies with levodopa generics are not available in Italy. Lack of data on generic formulations is a critical factor for their limited use in this country and often lead patients to refuse the generic version of the branded drug. An experimental, 2-centre, randomized, double-blind, 2-sequence, noninferiority cross-over study was designed to evaluate both the PK equivalence and clinical equivalence of multiple doses of the generic preparation of LDB, Teva Italia, compared to the originator (Madopar). Forty-three out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease on LDB, were recruited and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study sequences: generic-originator or originator-generic. Clinical evaluations were performed at the end of each study period. A PK study with an LDB fixed dose (100 + 25 mg) was performed in a subpopulation of 14 subjects. Clinical data showed a reduction of 0.49 and 1.54 in the mean UPDRS III scores for the LDB and the originator, respectively. The 95% CIs [-2.21: 0.11] of the mean difference original vs LDB are smaller than the clinically significant difference of 3 UPDRS III points, supporting the conclusion that the treatment with LDB is not inferior to the originator. No statistically significant differences were found with respect to area under the curve to last dose, half-life, maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration and last observed concentration. These findings prove the therapeutic clinical equivalence as well the PK equivalence of the generic LDB and the originator (Madopar).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31378952
doi: 10.1111/bcp.14086
pmc: PMC6848900
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dopamine Agents
0
Drug Combinations
0
Drugs, Generic
0
benserazide, levodopa drug combination
0
Levodopa
46627O600J
Benserazide
762OS3ZEJU
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase IV
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2605-2613Informations de copyright
© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.
Références
Clin Ther. 2011 Apr;33(4):500-10
pubmed: 21635995
Ann Neurol. 1988 Sep;24(3):366-71
pubmed: 3228270
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1984 Feb;12(1):83-91
pubmed: 6747820
Neurology. 2002 Feb 26;58(4 Suppl 1):S19-32
pubmed: 11909982
Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):1051-4
pubmed: 8780089
Mov Disord. 2006 Aug;21(8):1200-7
pubmed: 16673410
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006 Jul;7(10):1399-407
pubmed: 16805724
Arch Neurol. 2005 Jun;62(6):905-10
pubmed: 15956161
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 May;65(5):443-55
pubmed: 19229530
Mov Disord. 1996 Jul;11(4):427-30
pubmed: 8813223
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1987 Sep;13(3):141-78
pubmed: 3311529
Neurology. 2014 Apr 22;82(16):1402-9
pubmed: 24658930
J Pharm Sci. 2019 Mar;108(3):1227-1235
pubmed: 30385287
Ann Neurol. 1987 Apr;21(4):370-6
pubmed: 3579222
Neurology. 1999 Mar 10;52(4):763-7
pubmed: 10078724
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;85(11):2605-2613
pubmed: 31378952
Ann Neurol. 1988 Sep;24(3):372-8
pubmed: 3228271
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Feb;20(2):204-11
pubmed: 24275586
Neurol Clin. 1992 May;10(2):331-9
pubmed: 1584177
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1484-91
pubmed: 10816186
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):179-89
pubmed: 9056597
Mov Disord. 2001 Nov;16(6):1041-7
pubmed: 11748735
Neurology. 1988 Mar;38(3):419-21
pubmed: 3126408
Clin Ther. 2001 Feb;23(2):242-51
pubmed: 11293557
Lancet Neurol. 2003 Feb;2(2):107-16
pubmed: 12849267
JAMA. 1997 Jul 9;278(2):125-30
pubmed: 9214527
Mov Disord. 2004 Sep;19(9):997-1005
pubmed: 15372588