Measuring the academic value of academic medical centers: describing a methodology for developing an evaluation model at one Academic Medical Center.
Academic Medical Center (AMC)
Academic quality indicators (AQI)
Academic value
Delphi panel
Hospitals
Medical education
Methodology development
Journal
Israel journal of health policy research
ISSN: 2045-4015
Titre abrégé: Isr J Health Policy Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101584158
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 08 2019
05 08 2019
Historique:
received:
09
08
2018
accepted:
28
07
2019
entrez:
7
8
2019
pubmed:
7
8
2019
medline:
4
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) must simultaneously serve different purposes: Delivery of high quality healthcare services to patients, as the main mission, supported by other core missions such as academic activities, i.e., researching, teaching and tutoring, while maintaining solvency. This study aims to develop a methodology for constructing models evaluating the academic value provided by AMCs and implementing it at the largest AMC in Israel. Thirty five practiced educators and researchers, academic experts, faculty members and executives, all employed by a metropolitan 1500-bed AMC, were involved in developing academic quality indicators. First, an initial list of AMCs' academic quality indicators was drafted, using a literature review and consulting scholars. Afterwards, additional data and preferences were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews, complemented by a three-round Delphi Panel. Finally, the methodology for constructing a model evaluating the academic value provided by the AMC was developed. The composite academic quality indicators methodology consists of nine indicators (relative weight in parentheses): 'Scientific Publications Value' (18.7%), 'Completed Studies' (13.5%), 'Authors Value' (13.0%), 'Residents Quality' (11.3%), 'Competitive Grants Budget' (10.2%), 'Academic Training' (8.7%), 'Academic Positions' (8.3%), 'Number of Studies' (8.3%) and 'Academic Supervision' (8.0%). These indicators were grouped into three core categories: 'Education', 'Research' and 'Publications', having almost the same importance on a scale from zero to one (0-1), i.e., 0.363, 0.320, and 0.317, respectively. The results demonstrated a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach-alpha range: 0.79-0.86). We have found a gap in the ability to measure academic value provided by AMCs. The main contribution of this research is the development of methodology for constructing evaluation models for AMCs academic performance. Further studies are needed to further test the validity and reliability of the proposed methodology at other sites.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) must simultaneously serve different purposes: Delivery of high quality healthcare services to patients, as the main mission, supported by other core missions such as academic activities, i.e., researching, teaching and tutoring, while maintaining solvency. This study aims to develop a methodology for constructing models evaluating the academic value provided by AMCs and implementing it at the largest AMC in Israel.
METHODS
Thirty five practiced educators and researchers, academic experts, faculty members and executives, all employed by a metropolitan 1500-bed AMC, were involved in developing academic quality indicators. First, an initial list of AMCs' academic quality indicators was drafted, using a literature review and consulting scholars. Afterwards, additional data and preferences were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews, complemented by a three-round Delphi Panel. Finally, the methodology for constructing a model evaluating the academic value provided by the AMC was developed.
RESULTS
The composite academic quality indicators methodology consists of nine indicators (relative weight in parentheses): 'Scientific Publications Value' (18.7%), 'Completed Studies' (13.5%), 'Authors Value' (13.0%), 'Residents Quality' (11.3%), 'Competitive Grants Budget' (10.2%), 'Academic Training' (8.7%), 'Academic Positions' (8.3%), 'Number of Studies' (8.3%) and 'Academic Supervision' (8.0%). These indicators were grouped into three core categories: 'Education', 'Research' and 'Publications', having almost the same importance on a scale from zero to one (0-1), i.e., 0.363, 0.320, and 0.317, respectively. The results demonstrated a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach-alpha range: 0.79-0.86).
CONCLUSIONS
We have found a gap in the ability to measure academic value provided by AMCs. The main contribution of this research is the development of methodology for constructing evaluation models for AMCs academic performance. Further studies are needed to further test the validity and reliability of the proposed methodology at other sites.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31383017
doi: 10.1186/s13584-019-0334-4
pii: 10.1186/s13584-019-0334-4
pmc: PMC6681484
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 23;12:478
pubmed: 23259467
Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):544-549
pubmed: 28351068
Acad Med. 2000 Mar;75(3):303-13
pubmed: 10724325
Harefuah. 2015 Feb;154(2):107-9, 136
pubmed: 25856863
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):683-8
pubmed: 20573915
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476
pubmed: 21694759
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15
pubmed: 11095242
Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug;45(4):1024-40
pubmed: 20528990
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81
pubmed: 21142528
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9
pubmed: 24581294
Acad Med. 2000 Jan;75(1):28-40
pubmed: 10667873
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 02;10(4):e0122239
pubmed: 25837969
J R Soc Med. 2011 Jun;104(6):251-61
pubmed: 21659400
Acad Med. 2000 Feb;75(2):161-6
pubmed: 10693849
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):522
pubmed: 28774295
Health Res Policy Syst. 2004 Jul 23;2(1):4
pubmed: 15272939
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jul-Sep;33(3):225-33
pubmed: 18580302
Acad Med. 1997 Sep;72(9):787-93
pubmed: 9311321
J Health Care Finance. 2004 Spring;30(3):34-48
pubmed: 15151195
Ann Surg. 2000 Jul;232(1):32-41
pubmed: 10862192
BMJ. 2008 Oct 13;337:a1805
pubmed: 18852165
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 May;24(5):636-41
pubmed: 19259748
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Jan 14;11:2
pubmed: 23317431
Acad Med. 2005 Mar;80(3):244-52
pubmed: 15734806