Financial Eligibility Criteria and Medication Coverage for Independent Charity Patient Assistance Programs.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 08 2019
Historique:
entrez: 7 8 2019
pubmed: 7 8 2019
medline: 31 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although independent charity patient assistance programs improve patient access to costly prescription drugs, recent federal investigations have raised questions about their potential to increase pharmaceutical spending and to violate the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Little is known about the design of the programs, patient eligibility, or drug coverage. To examine the eligibility criteria of the independent charity patient assistance programs and the drugs covered by them. Descriptive cross-sectional study of the 6 largest independent charities offering patient assistance programs for patients including, but not limited to, Medicare beneficiaries in 2018. These charities offered 274 different disease-specific patient assistance programs. Drugs were identified for subgroup analysis that had any use reported on the Medicare Part D spending dashboard and any off-patent brand-name drugs that incurred more than $10 000 in Medicare spending per beneficiary in 2016. Support by independent charity patient assistance programs. The primary outcomes were the characteristics of patient assistance programs, including assistance type, insurance coverage (vs uninsured), and income eligibility. The secondary outcomes were the cost of the drugs covered by the patient assistance programs and the coverage of expensive off-patent brand-name drugs vs substitutable generic drugs. Among the 6 independent charity foundations included in the analysis, their total revenue in 2017 ranged from $24 million to $532 million, and expenditures on patient assistance programs ranged from $24 million to $353 million, representing on average, 86% of their revenue. Of the 274 patient assistance programs offered by these organizations, 168 (61%) provided only co-payment assistance, and the most common therapeutic area covered was cancer or cancer treatment-related symptoms (113 patient assistance programs; 41%). A total of 267 programs (97%) required insurance coverage as an eligibility criterion (ie, excluded uninsured patients). The most common income eligibility limit was 500% of the federal poverty level. The median annual cost of the drugs per beneficiary covered by the programs was $1157 (interquartile range, $247-$5609) compared with $367 (interquartile range, $100-$1500) for the noncovered drugs. Off-patent brand-name drugs (cost: >$10 000) were covered by a mean of 3.1 (SD, 2.0) patient assistance programs, whereas their generic equivalents were covered by a mean of 1.2 (SD, 1.0) patient assistance programs. In 2018, among 274 patient assistance programs operated by the 6 independent charity foundations, the majority did not provide coverage for uninsured patients. Medications that were covered by the patient assistance programs were generally more expensive than those that were not covered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31386135
pii: 2740721
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9943
pmc: PMC6686767
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prescription Drugs 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

422-429

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Références

Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):827-34
pubmed: 19414893
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 26;369(13):1188-9
pubmed: 23984672
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):97-9
pubmed: 25006717
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Oct;33(10):1761-9
pubmed: 25288420
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jul - Aug;13(4):759-766
pubmed: 27595427
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Apr;23(4):407-411
pubmed: 28345445
Semin Hematol. 2018 Oct;55(4):185-188
pubmed: 30502845
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):559-561
pubmed: 30789768

Auteurs

So-Yeon Kang (SY)

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Aditi Sen (A)

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Ge Bai (G)

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Gerard F Anderson (GF)

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH