Revascularization in left ventricular dysfunction: an update.
Journal
Current opinion in cardiology
ISSN: 1531-7080
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8608087
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
9
8
2019
pubmed:
9
8
2019
medline:
4
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Patients with significant CAD and LVD are a high-risk patient population. They make up a minority of the cases from the largest, prospective coronary revascularization trials. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Trial and its substudies are the most important and well cited in this field. The 10-year data from STICH showed that surgical revascularization was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy. Several smaller studies have confirmed that surgical revascularization carries a significant risk of short-term mortality but overall improved long-term outcomes in patients with LVD. Data from multiple observational studies further confirm that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is superior to percutaneous coronary revascularization for long-term survival and freedom from repeat revascularization in patients with LVD. We suggest that patients with LVD undergoing CABG should be considered for multiarterial grafting and that some patients may benefit from an off-pump procedure. Surgical revascularization confers a long-term survival benefit in patients with significant CAD and LVD. Further studies will be needed to precisely determine the ideal candidate for surgical versus percutaneous revascularization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31394562
doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000662
pii: 00001573-201909000-00014
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM