Assessment of long-term neurodevelopmental outcome following trials of medicinal products in newborn infants.


Journal

Pediatric research
ISSN: 1530-0447
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0100714

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 11 04 2019
accepted: 20 07 2019
revised: 14 07 2019
pubmed: 10 8 2019
medline: 22 9 2020
entrez: 10 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is significant uncertainty over the role of assessment of long-term neurodevelopmental outcome (LTO) in neonatal clinical trials. A multidisciplinary working group was established to identify key issues in this area and to make recommendations about optimal approaches to evaluate LTO in therapeutic trials in newborns, which can be developed by sponsors and investigators with other key stakeholders. A key consideration for neonatal trials is the potential for the investigational product to cause widespread effects and drives the need to assess outcome in multiple organs. Thus investigators must assess whether the product has an impact on the brain and the potential for it to cause potential effects on LTO. Critically, is assessment of LTO an important direct therapeutic target or a safety outcome? Such decisions and outcomes need to be specific to the product being studied and use published data, only considering expert opinion when prior evidence does not exist. In designing the trial, the balance of benefits, costs, and burdens of assessments to the researcher and families need to be considered. Families and parent advocates should be involved in design and execution of the study. A framework is presented for use by all key stakeholders to determine the need, nature, and duration of LTO assessments in regulatory trials involving newborn infants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31398720
doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0526-1
pii: 10.1038/s41390-019-0526-1
pmc: PMC6848023
doi:

Substances chimiques

Neuroprotective Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

567-572

Subventions

Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U18 FD005320
Pays : United States
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Doyle, L. W. et al. Long term follow up of high risk children: who, why and how?. BMC Pediatr. 14, 279 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-279
Azzopardi, D. et al. Effects of hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia on childhood outcomes. New Engl. J. Med. 371, 140–149 (2014).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315788
de Vries, L. S. & Jongmans, M. J. Long-term outcome after neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 95, F220–F224 (2010).
doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.148205
Marlow, N. Is survival and neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years of age the gold standard outcome for neonatal studies? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 100, F82–F84 (2015).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306191
Bolton, C. E. et al. The EPICure study: association between hemodynamics and lung function at 11 years after extremely preterm birth. J. Pediatr. 161, 595–601 (2012). e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.03.052
Marlow, N. Measuring neurodevelopmental outcome in neonatal trials: a continuing and increasing challenge. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 98, F554–F558 (2013).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302970
Tin, W., Wariyar, U. K. & Hey, E. N. Selection biases invalidate current low birthweight weight-for-gestation standards. The Northern Neonatal Network. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 104, 180–185 (1997).
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11041.x
Wolke, D. et al. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet 345, 447 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90425-5
Callanan, C. et al. Children followed with difficulty: how do they differ? J. Paediatr. Child Health 37, 152–156 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00621.x
Moore, T. et al. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. BMJ 345, e7961 (2012).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7961
Lum, S. et al. Nature and severity of lung function abnormalities in extremely pre-term children at 11 years of age. Eur. Respir. J. 37, 1199–1207 (2011).
doi: 10.1183/09031936.00071110
Anderson, P. J. & Doyle, L. W. Executive functioning in school-aged children who were born very preterm or with extremely low birth weight in the 1990s. Pediatrics 114, 50–57 (2004).
doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.50
McEniery, C. M. et al. Cardiovascular consequences of extreme prematurity: the EPICure study. J. Hypertens. 29, 1367–1373 (2011).
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328347e333
Linsell, L. et al. Prognostic factors for behavioral problems and psychiatric disorders in children born very preterm or very low birth weight: a systematic review. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 37, 88–102 (2016).
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000238
Linsell, L. et al. Prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born very preterm or with very low birth weight: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatrics 169, 1162–1172 (2015).
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2175
Linsell, L. et al. Prognostic factors for cerebral palsy and motor impairment in children born very preterm or very low birthweight: a systematic review. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 58, 554–569 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12972
BAPM/RCPCH Working Group. Classification of Health Status at 2 Years as a Perinatal Outcome. Report of a BAPM/RCPCH Working Group (British Association of Perinatal Medicine, London, 2008).

Auteurs

Neil Marlow (N)

Neonatal Medicine, University College London, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health London, London, UK. n.marlow@ucl.ac.uk.

Lex W Doyle (LW)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Peter Anderson (P)

Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health & School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Samantha Johnson (S)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Varsha Bhatt-Mehta (V)

C.S.Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Giancarlo Natalucci (G)

Department of Neonatology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich; Child Development Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Brian A Darlow (BA)

Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Jonathan M Davis (JM)

Department of Pediatrics, Floating Hospital for Children, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA and Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

Mark A Turner (MA)

Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH