Assessment of long-term neurodevelopmental outcome following trials of medicinal products in newborn infants.
Journal
Pediatric research
ISSN: 1530-0447
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0100714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
11
04
2019
accepted:
20
07
2019
revised:
14
07
2019
pubmed:
10
8
2019
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
10
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is significant uncertainty over the role of assessment of long-term neurodevelopmental outcome (LTO) in neonatal clinical trials. A multidisciplinary working group was established to identify key issues in this area and to make recommendations about optimal approaches to evaluate LTO in therapeutic trials in newborns, which can be developed by sponsors and investigators with other key stakeholders. A key consideration for neonatal trials is the potential for the investigational product to cause widespread effects and drives the need to assess outcome in multiple organs. Thus investigators must assess whether the product has an impact on the brain and the potential for it to cause potential effects on LTO. Critically, is assessment of LTO an important direct therapeutic target or a safety outcome? Such decisions and outcomes need to be specific to the product being studied and use published data, only considering expert opinion when prior evidence does not exist. In designing the trial, the balance of benefits, costs, and burdens of assessments to the researcher and families need to be considered. Families and parent advocates should be involved in design and execution of the study. A framework is presented for use by all key stakeholders to determine the need, nature, and duration of LTO assessments in regulatory trials involving newborn infants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31398720
doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0526-1
pii: 10.1038/s41390-019-0526-1
pmc: PMC6848023
doi:
Substances chimiques
Neuroprotective Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
567-572Subventions
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U18 FD005320
Pays : United States
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Doyle, L. W. et al. Long term follow up of high risk children: who, why and how?. BMC Pediatr. 14, 279 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-279
Azzopardi, D. et al. Effects of hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia on childhood outcomes. New Engl. J. Med. 371, 140–149 (2014).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315788
de Vries, L. S. & Jongmans, M. J. Long-term outcome after neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 95, F220–F224 (2010).
doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.148205
Marlow, N. Is survival and neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years of age the gold standard outcome for neonatal studies? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 100, F82–F84 (2015).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306191
Bolton, C. E. et al. The EPICure study: association between hemodynamics and lung function at 11 years after extremely preterm birth. J. Pediatr. 161, 595–601 (2012). e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.03.052
Marlow, N. Measuring neurodevelopmental outcome in neonatal trials: a continuing and increasing challenge. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 98, F554–F558 (2013).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302970
Tin, W., Wariyar, U. K. & Hey, E. N. Selection biases invalidate current low birthweight weight-for-gestation standards. The Northern Neonatal Network. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 104, 180–185 (1997).
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11041.x
Wolke, D. et al. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet 345, 447 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90425-5
Callanan, C. et al. Children followed with difficulty: how do they differ? J. Paediatr. Child Health 37, 152–156 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00621.x
Moore, T. et al. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. BMJ 345, e7961 (2012).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7961
Lum, S. et al. Nature and severity of lung function abnormalities in extremely pre-term children at 11 years of age. Eur. Respir. J. 37, 1199–1207 (2011).
doi: 10.1183/09031936.00071110
Anderson, P. J. & Doyle, L. W. Executive functioning in school-aged children who were born very preterm or with extremely low birth weight in the 1990s. Pediatrics 114, 50–57 (2004).
doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.50
McEniery, C. M. et al. Cardiovascular consequences of extreme prematurity: the EPICure study. J. Hypertens. 29, 1367–1373 (2011).
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328347e333
Linsell, L. et al. Prognostic factors for behavioral problems and psychiatric disorders in children born very preterm or very low birth weight: a systematic review. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 37, 88–102 (2016).
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000238
Linsell, L. et al. Prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born very preterm or with very low birth weight: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatrics 169, 1162–1172 (2015).
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2175
Linsell, L. et al. Prognostic factors for cerebral palsy and motor impairment in children born very preterm or very low birthweight: a systematic review. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 58, 554–569 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12972
BAPM/RCPCH Working Group. Classification of Health Status at 2 Years as a Perinatal Outcome. Report of a BAPM/RCPCH Working Group (British Association of Perinatal Medicine, London, 2008).