Effects of αβ-Blocker Versus β1-Blocker Treatment on Heart Rate Response During Incremental Cardiopulmonary Exercise in Japanese Male Patients with Subacute Myocardial Infarction.
beta-blocker
cardiac rehabilitation
chronotropic index
heart rate response
metabolic chronotropic relationship
myocardial infarction
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 08 2019
08 08 2019
Historique:
received:
24
06
2019
revised:
02
08
2019
accepted:
07
08
2019
entrez:
11
8
2019
pubmed:
11
8
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A simplified substitute for heart rate (HR) at the anaerobic threshold (AT), i.e., resting HR plus 30 beats per minute or a percentage of predicted maximum HR, is used as a way to determine exercise intensity without cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) data. However, difficulties arise when using this method in subacute myocardial infarction (MI) patients undergoing beta-blocker therapy. This study compared the effects of αβ-blocker and β1-blocker treatment to clarify how different beta blockers affect HR response during incremental exercise. MI patients were divided into αβ-blocker (
Identifiants
pubmed: 31398919
pii: ijerph16162838
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162838
pmc: PMC6720421
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Am Heart J. 2004 Nov;148(5):910-4
pubmed: 15523326
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 5;67(1):1-12
pubmed: 26764059
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;5(4):579-585
pubmed: 29573575
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Dec;18(7):1643-9
pubmed: 1960309
Eur Heart J. 1996 Oct;17(10):1511-21
pubmed: 8909908
Circulation. 2011 Mar 8;123(9):1010-20
pubmed: 21382903
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 15;116(10):1502-8
pubmed: 26520013
Pflugers Arch. 2015 Jul;467(7):1509-1522
pubmed: 25127674
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1474-80
pubmed: 23918838
Heart Vessels. 2019 Jun;34(6):957-964
pubmed: 30604188
Cardiol Clin. 1992 Nov;10(4):705-17
pubmed: 1423382
Circ J. 2011;75(8):1982-91
pubmed: 21697605
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2014 Dec 03;6:12-18
pubmed: 28785620
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381
pubmed: 27222591
Circulation. 1990 Jan;81(1 Suppl):II14-30
pubmed: 2403868
Circ J. 2014;78(8):2022-93
pubmed: 25047729
Jpn Circ J. 1998 Sep;62(9):658-64
pubmed: 9766703
J Physiol. 2014 Jun 15;592(12):2491-500
pubmed: 24756637
Acta Cardiol. 2010 Dec;65(6):631-8
pubmed: 21302668
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Dec;70(12):1082
pubmed: 29198432
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Jun;60(6):2020-7
pubmed: 3087938
Circ J. 2011;75(7):1696-705
pubmed: 21576828
Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1385-90
pubmed: 11356434
Biol Pharm Bull. 2010;33(8):1378-84
pubmed: 20686235
Circ J. 2006 Aug;70(8):1017-25
pubmed: 16864935
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006 Aug;13(4):538-43
pubmed: 16874142