Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from systemic drugs.


Journal

Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 26 06 2019
revised: 08 08 2019
accepted: 09 08 2019
pubmed: 11 8 2019
medline: 30 5 2020
entrez: 11 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Health-care workers (HCWs) and professionals working in the pharmaceutical industry are at risk of developing occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) from systemic drugs (or drug intermediates). To study demographic characteristics and identify systemic drugs responsible for OACD in patients investigated for contact allergy during the period 2001-2019. In the study period, 9780 patients were patch tested with the European baseline series, sometimes with additional series, and other relevant potential allergens. All patients with a positive patch-test reaction to systemic medication exposed to at work were included for further analysis. Of 1248 HCWs examined in our clinic, 201 suffered from OACD. In 26 (13%) dermatitis was caused by skin contact with a systemic drug: 19 nurses, five chemists working in the pharmaceutical industry, one physician, and one veterinarian. In total, 45 positive patch-test reactions to 20 different systemic drugs were found, with tetrazepam (n = 11), ranitidine hydrochloride (n = 5), and zolpidem (n = 4) being the most frequent. Three pharmaceutical chemists were sensitized to a drug intermediate. The lesions were mostly localized on the hands, but often also on the face, as airborne dermatitis. As much as 13% of OACD in HCWs, diagnosed in our tertiary referral center, was attributable to systemic drugs, most frequently in nurses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Health-care workers (HCWs) and professionals working in the pharmaceutical industry are at risk of developing occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) from systemic drugs (or drug intermediates).
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To study demographic characteristics and identify systemic drugs responsible for OACD in patients investigated for contact allergy during the period 2001-2019.
METHODS METHODS
In the study period, 9780 patients were patch tested with the European baseline series, sometimes with additional series, and other relevant potential allergens. All patients with a positive patch-test reaction to systemic medication exposed to at work were included for further analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 1248 HCWs examined in our clinic, 201 suffered from OACD. In 26 (13%) dermatitis was caused by skin contact with a systemic drug: 19 nurses, five chemists working in the pharmaceutical industry, one physician, and one veterinarian. In total, 45 positive patch-test reactions to 20 different systemic drugs were found, with tetrazepam (n = 11), ranitidine hydrochloride (n = 5), and zolpidem (n = 4) being the most frequent. Three pharmaceutical chemists were sensitized to a drug intermediate. The lesions were mostly localized on the hands, but often also on the face, as airborne dermatitis.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
As much as 13% of OACD in HCWs, diagnosed in our tertiary referral center, was attributable to systemic drugs, most frequently in nurses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31400016
doi: 10.1111/cod.13383
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

24-30

Subventions

Organisme : University Hospitals Leuven

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Whitaker P. Occupational allergy to pharmaceutical products. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;16:101-106.
Suneja T, Belsito DV. Occupational dermatoses in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58:285-290.
Goossens A, Vander Hulst K. The pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. In book:. In: John S, Johansen J, Rustemeyer T, Elsner P, Maibach H, eds. Kanerva's Occupational Dermatology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012:p1621-p1633.
Minciullo PL, Imbesi S, Tigano V, Gangemi S. Airborne contact dermatitis to drugs. Allergol Immunopathol. 2013;41:121-126.
Nicholson PJ. Evidence-based guidelines: occupational contact dermatitis and urticarial. Occup Med. 2010;60:502-504.
Gielen K, Goossens A. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from drugs in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45:273-279.
Goossens A, Drieghe J. Computer applications in contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38:51-52.
de Groot AC. Patch Testing, Test concentrations and vehicles for 4350 chemicals. 3rd ed. Wapserveen: Acdegroot Publishing; 2008.
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73:195-221.
Hodges EA, Rowsey PJ, Gray TF, et al. Bridging the gender divide: facilitating the educational path for men in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2017;56:295-299.
Nettis E, Colanardi MC, Soccio AL, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis among healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46:101-107.
Kasemsarn P, Bosco J, Nixon RL. The role of the skin barrier in occupational skin diseases. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2016;49:135-143.
Swinnen I, Goossens A. An update on airborne contact dermatitis: 2007-2011. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:232-238.
Baeck M, Goossens A. Patients with airborne sensitization/contact dermatitis from budesonide-containing aerosols ‘by proxy’. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:1-8.
Corazza M, Baldo F, Osti F, Virgili A. Airborne allergic contact dermatitis due to budesonide from professional exposure. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59:318-319.
Bennett MF, Lowney AC, Bourke JF. Occupational contact dermatitis in the pharmaceutical industry. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:654-656.
Swinnen I, Ghys K, Kerre S, et al. Occupational airborne contact dermatitis from benzodiazepines and other drugs. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;70:227-232.
Vander Hulst K, Kerre S, Goossens A. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from tetrazepam in nurses. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62:303-308.
Schubert S, Bauer A, Molin S, Skudlik C, Geier J. Occupational contact sensitization in female geriatric nurses: data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2005-2014. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:469-476.
Molin S, Bauer A, Schnuch A, Geier J. Occupational contact allergy in nurses: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology 2003-2012. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:164-171.
Lepp U, Zabel P, Greinert U. Occupational airborne contact allergy to tetrazepam. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49:260-261.
Choquet-Kastylevsky G, Testud F, Chalmet P, et al. Occupational contact allergy to tetrazepam. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:372.
Sánchez I, García-Abujeta JL, Fernández L, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome from tetrazepam. Allergol Immunopathol. 1998;26:55-57.
EMA. Tetrazepam-containing medicines suspended across the EU. 2013; http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Referrals_document/Tetrazepam_containing_medicinal_products/Position_provided_by_CMDh/WC500146678.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2019.
Neumark M, Moshe S, Ingber A, Slodownik D. Occupational airborne contact dermatitis to simvastatin, carvedilol, and zolpidem. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:51-52.
Ryan PJJ, Rycroft RJG, Aston IR. Allergic contact dermatitis from occupational exposure to ranitidine hydrochloride. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;48:67-68.
Antunes J, Silva R, Pacheco D, Travassos R, Filipe P. Occupational contact allergy to cephalosporins. Dermatol Online J. 2011;15:13.
Baeck M, Goossens A. Immediate and delayed allergic hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: practical guidelines. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66:38-45.
Morthier R. Contactallergie voor propacetamol: een gevalstudie. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 2001;57:375-378.
Balieva F, Steinkjer B. Contact dermatitis to captopril. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61:177-178.
Wahlberg JE, Boman A. Contact sensitivity to quinidine sulfate from occupational exposure. Contact Dermatitis. 1981;7:27-31.
Rudzki E, Rebandel P. Contact sensitivity to quinazoline oxide. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:56-57.
Fedele R, Ricciardi L, Mazzeo L, Isola S. Allergic contact dermatitis to nebivolol. Allergy. 2002;57:864-865.
Mauro M, De Giusti V, Bovenzi M, Larese Filon F. Effectiveness of a secondary prevention protocol for occupational contact dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:656-663.

Auteurs

Liesbeth Gilissen (L)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory of Dermato-Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Dermatology, Contact Allergy Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Emma Boeckxstaens (E)

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Julie Geebelen (J)

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

An Goossens (A)

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory of Dermato-Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Dermatology, Contact Allergy Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH