Predictive Model for Failed Induction of Labor Among Obese Women.
Adult
Delivery, Obstetric
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Labor, Induced
/ adverse effects
Labor, Obstetric
/ physiology
Logistic Models
Obesity
/ complications
Obstetric Labor Complications
/ diagnosis
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
United States
Journal
Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
8
2019
medline:
24
3
2020
entrez:
13
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate antenatal risk factors associated with failed induction of labor among obese women to develop a predictive model for induction of labor outcome. We conducted a population-based cohort study of all obese (body mass index higher than 30.0) women with singleton live births who underwent attempted induction of labor between 37 and 44 weeks of gestation in the United States from 2012 to 2016 using de-identified U.S live birth records. The primary objective was to build a predictive model for the probability of induction of labor failure using antenatal factors. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association of these factors on risk of failed induction of labor. We performed k-fold cross-validation for internal validation and then externally validated the model using a separate live birth cohort from 2017 (n=197,982). An online calculator was developed after validation, and calibration was performed. The 10 variables selected for inclusion in the model in order of significance were prior vaginal delivery, prior cesarean delivery, maternal height, age, weight at delivery, parity, gestational weight gain, Medicaid insurance, pregestational diabetes, and chronic hypertension. Among 19,844,580 live births in the United States between 2012 and 2016, 1,098,981 obese women with singleton pregnancies underwent induction of labor, of which 273,184 (24.9%) were unsuccessful. The receiver operator characteristic curve for the 10 variable model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.79). External validation demonstrated a consistent measure of discrimination, with an AUC curve of 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.77). This model provides valuable estimation as to the cumulative effect of multiple factors on the risk of failed induction of labor among obese parturients. The predictive model identifies women at increased or decreased risk (ie, greater than 75% vs less than 20%) for cesarean delivery. This risk calculator may be a useful tool for practitioners in the counseling, triaging, risk stratifying, and delivery planning for obese women before attempted induction of labor.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31403588
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003377
pii: 00006250-201909000-00009
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
485-493Références
Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS data brief, no 288. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2017.
Deputy NP, Dub B, Sharma AJ. Prevalence and trends in prepregnancy normal weight—48 States, New York city, and District of Columbia, 2011–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;66:1402–7.
Wolfe KB, Rossi RA, Warshak CR. The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:128.e1–7.
Barau G, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC, Dedecker F, Laffite A, Gérardin P, et al. Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean delivery in term deliveries. BJOG 2006;113:1173–7.
Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Beckers K, Vansant G. Maternal obesity: pregnancy complications, gestational weight gain and nutrition. Obes Rev 2008;9:140–50.
Kominiarek MA, VanVeldhusien P, Hibbard J, Landy H, Haberman S, Learman L, et al. The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:264.e1–7.
Usha Kiran TS, Hemmadi S, Bethel J, Evans J. Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG 2005;112:768–72.
Cedergren MI. Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:219–24.
Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:452–6.
Carlson NS, Hernandez TL, Hurt KJ. Parturition dysfunction in obesity: time to target the pathobiology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015;13:135.
Blomberg M. Maternal obesity and risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:561–8.
National Center for Health Statistics. 2003 revisions of the U.S. standard certificate of live birth. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdf. Retrieved January 1, 2019.
National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death (2003 revision). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/handbooks-and-guides.htm. Retrieved February 1, 2019.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series 894. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:i–xii, 1–253.
Obesity in pregnancy. Practice Bulletin No. 156. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:e112–26.
Reichman NE, Schwartz-Soicher O. Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:32.e1–8.