Perinatal outcomes in 521 gestations after fresh and frozen cycles: a secondary outcome of a randomized controlled trial comparing GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocols.


Journal

Reproductive biomedicine online
ISSN: 1472-6491
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biomed Online
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101122473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 03 04 2019
revised: 05 05 2019
accepted: 14 05 2019
pubmed: 15 8 2019
medline: 21 8 2020
entrez: 15 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Are perinatal outcomes different after treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist versus the long GnRH agonist protocol for IVF? Perinatal outcomes were secondary outcomes in a large Phase IV, dual-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial to compare GnRH antagonist and long GnRH agonist protocols in women <40 years undergoing their first assisted reproductive technology treatment. Women (n = 1050) were randomized in a ratio 1:1 from January 2009 to December 2013 and followed until December 2016. All fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles from a single oocyte aspiration, resulting in a gestation (human chorionic gonadotrophin >10 IU/l) were included (n = 521). Data were analysed to compare preterm birth [PTB] (<37 weeks), very PTB (<32 weeks), low birthweight [LBW] (<2500 g) and very LBW (<1500 g) rates among singleton live births in GnRH antagonist versus agonist protocol. Similar perinatal outcomes were found after both protocols. In singletons after fresh embryo transfer, mean gestational age at delivery was 39.1 ± 2.49 versus 39.3 ± 1.90 (P = 0.67) and very PTB rates 1.9% versus 0% (P = 0.17). Mean birthweight was 3264 ± 662 g in the antagonist and 3341 ± 562 g in the agonist group (P = 0.37). LBW was found in 12.4% versus 7% (P = 0.19) and very LBW in 2.9% versus 1% (P = 0.34). In FET cycles, the perinatal outcomes were similar. Small for gestational age and large for gestational age rates were similar in both protocols for singleton live births after fresh and FET. Perinatal outcomes are similar after the GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocols for IVF. The choice of the GnRH analogue in ovarian stimulation should be based solely on optimizing the chance of pregnancy and not on risks in perinatal outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31409522
pii: S1472-6483(19)30548-6
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.05.010
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fertility Agents, Female 0
Hormone Antagonists 0
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone 33515-09-2

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase IV Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

659-664

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Claudia Tomás (C)

The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Centre of Infertility and Medically Assisted Reproduction, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal. Electronic address: clautomas@gmail.com.

Mette Toftager (M)

The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Kristine Løssl (K)

The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jeanette Bogstad (J)

The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Lisbeth Prætorius (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark.

Anne Zedeler (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark.

Thue Bryndorf (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark.

Anders Nyboe Andersen (AN)

The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Anja Pinborg (A)

The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH