Comparative effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other biological agents on cardiovascular risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Abatacept
/ therapeutic use
Adiponectin
/ metabolism
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Apolipoprotein A-I
/ drug effects
Apolipoprotein B-100
/ drug effects
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ complications
Biological Factors
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ blood
Female
Humans
Insulin Resistance
/ physiology
Leptin
/ metabolism
Lipoprotein(a)
/ drug effects
Male
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Rituximab
/ therapeutic use
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
adipokine
apolipoprotein
biological agents
cardiovascular risk
rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
RMD open
ISSN: 2056-5933
Titre abrégé: RMD Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101662038
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
07
01
2019
revised:
28
03
2019
accepted:
15
04
2019
entrez:
16
8
2019
pubmed:
16
8
2019
medline:
16
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To comparatively investigate the differential effect of second-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) versus other biological agents on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the serum levels of lipoprotein-associated apoproteins ApoA1 and ApoB100 and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and the leptin/adiponectin ratio (LAR) as an insulin resistance proxy in patients with RA from the Rotation Or Change (ROC) trial treated with either a second-line TNFi or another biologic (tocilizumab (TCZ), rituximab or abatacept) at baseline and week 24. We compared the changes in biomarker levels in each group and according to the EULAR response. Of the 300 patients enrolled in the ROC trial, 203 were included in the study, including 96 in the second-line TNFi group and 107 in the other biological group. The measured biomarkers did not deteriorate between baseline and week 24 regardless of the group. A greater improvement in the LAR was noted in the other biological group (median (IQR) -0.12 ng/µg (-0.58 to 0.31) vs 0.04 (-0.19 to 0.43), p=0.033), and a greater improvement in the Lp(a) level was observed following treatment with TCZ than with a TNFi (-0.05 g/L (-0.11 to -0.01) vs -0.01 g/L (-0.02 to 0.01), p<0.001). When considering the patients' responses to treatment, improved biomarkers were mainly observed in the EULAR responders in each treatment group. TNFis and non-TNFis were neutral on improved CVD risk-associated biomarkers in patients with RA insufficiently controlled by TNFis. TCZ could be associated with a better improvement concerning Lp(a) and LAR than TNFis. This improvement could be related to a good therapeutic response, thereby supporting the need of good control of RA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01000441, registered on 22 October 2009.
Sections du résumé
Background
To comparatively investigate the differential effect of second-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) versus other biological agents on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-associated biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods
We evaluated the serum levels of lipoprotein-associated apoproteins ApoA1 and ApoB100 and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and the leptin/adiponectin ratio (LAR) as an insulin resistance proxy in patients with RA from the Rotation Or Change (ROC) trial treated with either a second-line TNFi or another biologic (tocilizumab (TCZ), rituximab or abatacept) at baseline and week 24. We compared the changes in biomarker levels in each group and according to the EULAR response.
Results
Of the 300 patients enrolled in the ROC trial, 203 were included in the study, including 96 in the second-line TNFi group and 107 in the other biological group. The measured biomarkers did not deteriorate between baseline and week 24 regardless of the group. A greater improvement in the LAR was noted in the other biological group (median (IQR) -0.12 ng/µg (-0.58 to 0.31) vs 0.04 (-0.19 to 0.43), p=0.033), and a greater improvement in the Lp(a) level was observed following treatment with TCZ than with a TNFi (-0.05 g/L (-0.11 to -0.01) vs -0.01 g/L (-0.02 to 0.01), p<0.001). When considering the patients' responses to treatment, improved biomarkers were mainly observed in the EULAR responders in each treatment group.
Conclusions
TNFis and non-TNFis were neutral on improved CVD risk-associated biomarkers in patients with RA insufficiently controlled by TNFis. TCZ could be associated with a better improvement concerning Lp(a) and LAR than TNFis. This improvement could be related to a good therapeutic response, thereby supporting the need of good control of RA.
Trial registration number
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01000441, registered on 22 October 2009.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31413865
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000897
pii: rmdopen-2019-000897
pmc: PMC6667971
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adiponectin
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Apolipoprotein A-I
0
Apolipoprotein B-100
0
Biological Factors
0
Biomarkers
0
Leptin
0
Lipoprotein(a)
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Abatacept
7D0YB67S97
tocilizumab
I031V2H011
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01000441']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000897Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JSe: consulting fees and symposia: BMS, Janssen, Menarini, MSD, Pfizer, Roche France, Fresenius Kabi, Lilly, Sandoz and Abbvie; research grants: Roche France and Pfizer. JC: fees for academic conferences by Janssen, MSD, ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Chugai and Novartis. JSi: fees from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Sharp, Dohme, UCB, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Actelion, Amgen and Hospira. FB: current or past board member of Pfizer, Abbvie, Merck Serono, Servier, Expanscience, Sanofi, UCB, Novartis, Biogaran, Biogen and Proxymagen; consultant for Janssen and Flexion; received grants from Servier and TRB Chemedica; and is on speaker’s bureau for Servier and Abbvie. J-EG: consulting fees and research grants: Abbvie, BMS, MSD, UCB, Roche and Pfizer.
Références
Lancet. 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):224-33
pubmed: 18640459
JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1172-1180
pubmed: 27654603
Scand J Rheumatol. 2013;42(3):169-75
pubmed: 23311768
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Jun;28(6):705-10
pubmed: 19319624
JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1205-1206
pubmed: 27654606
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1813-8
pubmed: 26792814
Atherosclerosis. 2013 Jul;229(1):174-81
pubmed: 23746537
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Nov;69(11):1929-33
pubmed: 20498216
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr;46(4):862-73
pubmed: 11953961
Biologics. 2013;7:259-64
pubmed: 24324327
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Mar;70(3):482-7
pubmed: 21216812
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Mar-Apr;36(2):310-313
pubmed: 29303702
Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(6):R194
pubmed: 24245495
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Sep;71(9):1524-9
pubmed: 22425941
J Intern Med. 2004 Feb;255(2):188-205
pubmed: 14746556
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Apr;76(4):654-660
pubmed: 28073800
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Apr;74(4):694-702
pubmed: 24368514
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Feb;31(2):202-7
pubmed: 26839473
Circulation. 2003 Dec 16;108(24):2957-63
pubmed: 14676136
Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1541-50
pubmed: 23515142
Circulation. 2008 Nov 11;118(20):2047-56
pubmed: 18955664
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;67(2):372-80
pubmed: 25332171
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Feb;74(2):326-32
pubmed: 25351522
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1806-12
pubmed: 26613768
J Clin Lipidol. 2017 May - Jun;11(3):749-756.e3
pubmed: 28476652
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Jun;65(6):1430-8
pubmed: 23460074
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0130709
pubmed: 26114946
Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(4):259-64
pubmed: 24689997
Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-1003
pubmed: 12788299
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008 Jul-Aug;26(4):596-603
pubmed: 18799090
Diabetologia. 2009 Nov;52(11):2345-2349
pubmed: 19756488
Rheumatol Int. 2011 Apr;31(4):451-6
pubmed: 20024554
Arthritis Rheum. 1996 Jan;39(1):34-40
pubmed: 8546736
J Lipid Res. 2004 Jul;45(7):1169-96
pubmed: 15102878
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;69(6):1154-1164
pubmed: 28245350
Lancet. 2001 Dec 15;358(9298):2026-33
pubmed: 11755609
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):862-8
pubmed: 22267329
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Mar;75(3):560-5
pubmed: 25637001
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Mar 24;168(6):598-608
pubmed: 18362252