The TOMATO Study (Tacrolimus Metabolization in Kidney Transplantation): Impact of the Concentration-Dose Ratio on Death-censored Graft Survival.


Journal

Transplantation
ISSN: 1534-6080
Titre abrégé: Transplantation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0132144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 16 8 2019
medline: 7 10 2020
entrez: 16 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tacrolimus trough concentrations (mean/variability), as well as concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D ratio), affect kidney allograft outcomes. We investigated the link between the C/D ratio and death-censored kidney graft survival (DCGS). We performed a retrospective study on 1029 kidney transplant patients (2004-2016) with the following criteria: tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, >1-year graft survival, no initial use of everolimus, and available anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody data. We analyzed the impact of the time-varying C/D ratio on DCGS. Fast metabolizers were defined by a C/D ratio < 1.05. We also investigated the effect of an early (mo 3 to mo 6 post transplantation) C/D ratio below 1.05. Cox survival analyses were performed, adjusting for potential confounders (tacrolimus trough, variability of tacrolimus trough, de novo donor-specific antibody development, cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype, pregraft sensitization, mo 3 glomerular filtration rate). Time-varying C/D ratio was significantly associated with DCGS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; P < 0.001) in a univariate model, on the full analysis set comprising 1029 patients. In the multivariate time-varying model, based on 666 patients with available cytochrome P450 3A5 genotypes, the effect of the C/D ratio remained significant (HR, 2.26; P = 0.015); even when glomerular filtration rate at month 3 < 30 mL/min/1.73 m (HR, 2.61; P = 0.011), de novo donor-specific antibody development (HR, 4.09; P < 0.001) and continued steroid prescription (HR=2.08, P = 0.014) were taken into account (other covariates, including tacrolimus trough concentrations, were nonsignificant). In the same multivariate model, the effect of early C/D ratio (median at mo 3 and mo 6) remained significantly associated with DCGS (HR, 2.25; P = 0.041). C/D ratio is an independent and early predictor of DCGS. Identification of fast metabolizers could be a strategy to improve graft survival, for example, by optimizing tacrolimus formulation. Mechanistic studies to understand the C/D ratio effect are required.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Tacrolimus trough concentrations (mean/variability), as well as concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D ratio), affect kidney allograft outcomes. We investigated the link between the C/D ratio and death-censored kidney graft survival (DCGS).
METHODS
We performed a retrospective study on 1029 kidney transplant patients (2004-2016) with the following criteria: tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, >1-year graft survival, no initial use of everolimus, and available anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody data. We analyzed the impact of the time-varying C/D ratio on DCGS. Fast metabolizers were defined by a C/D ratio < 1.05. We also investigated the effect of an early (mo 3 to mo 6 post transplantation) C/D ratio below 1.05. Cox survival analyses were performed, adjusting for potential confounders (tacrolimus trough, variability of tacrolimus trough, de novo donor-specific antibody development, cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype, pregraft sensitization, mo 3 glomerular filtration rate).
RESULTS
Time-varying C/D ratio was significantly associated with DCGS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; P < 0.001) in a univariate model, on the full analysis set comprising 1029 patients. In the multivariate time-varying model, based on 666 patients with available cytochrome P450 3A5 genotypes, the effect of the C/D ratio remained significant (HR, 2.26; P = 0.015); even when glomerular filtration rate at month 3 < 30 mL/min/1.73 m (HR, 2.61; P = 0.011), de novo donor-specific antibody development (HR, 4.09; P < 0.001) and continued steroid prescription (HR=2.08, P = 0.014) were taken into account (other covariates, including tacrolimus trough concentrations, were nonsignificant). In the same multivariate model, the effect of early C/D ratio (median at mo 3 and mo 6) remained significantly associated with DCGS (HR, 2.25; P = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS
C/D ratio is an independent and early predictor of DCGS. Identification of fast metabolizers could be a strategy to improve graft survival, for example, by optimizing tacrolimus formulation. Mechanistic studies to understand the C/D ratio effect are required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31415035
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002920
pii: 00007890-202006000-00028
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immunosuppressive Agents 0
Isoantibodies 0
CYP3A5 protein, human EC 1.14.14.1
Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A EC 1.14.14.1
Mycophenolic Acid HU9DX48N0T
Tacrolimus WM0HAQ4WNM

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1263-1271

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, et al.; ELITE-Symphony StudyReduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357252562–2575
Ekberg H, Bernasconi C, Tedesco-Silva H, et al. Calcineurin inhibitor minimization in the symphony study: observational results 3 years after transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2009; 981876–1885
Dugast E, Soulillou JP, Foucher Y, et al. Failure of calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus) weaning randomized trial in long-term stable kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2016; 16113255–3261
Gatault P, Kamar N, Büchler M, et al. Reduction of extended-release tacrolimus dose in low-immunological-risk kidney transplant recipients increases risk of rejection and appearance of donor-specific antibodies: a randomized study. Am J Transplant. 2017; 1751370–1379
Borra LC, Roodnat JI, Kal JA, et al. High within-patient variability in the clearance of tacrolimus is a risk factor for poor long-term outcome after kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 2582757–2763
O’Regan JA, Canney M, Connaughton DM, et al. Tacrolimus trough-level variability predicts long-term allograft survival following kidney transplantation. J Nephrol. 2016; 292269–276
Rodrigo E, Segundo DS, Fernández-Fresnedo G, et al. Within-patient variability in tacrolimus blood levels predicts kidney graft loss and donor-specific antibody development. Transplantation. 2016; 100112479–2485
Knight SR. Intrapatient variability in tacrolimus exposure—a useful tool for clinical practice? Transpl Int. 2016; 29111155–1157
Thölking G, Fortmann C, Koch R, et al. The tacrolimus metabolism rate influences renal function after kidney transplantation. PLOS One. 2014; 910e111128
Egeland EJ, Robertsen I, Hermann M, et al. High tacrolimus clearance is a risk factor for acute rejection in the early phase after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2017; 1018e273–e279
Schütte-Nütgen K, Thölking G, Steinke J, et al. Fast Tac metabolizers at risk—it is time for a C/D ratio calculation. J Clin Med. 2019; 85587
Egeland EJ, Reisaeter AV, Robertsen I, et al. High tacrolimus clearance—a risk factor for development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in the transplanted kidney: a retrospective single-center cohort study. Transpl Int. 2019; 323257–269
Sapir-Pichhadze R, Wang Y, Famure O, et al. Time-dependent variability in tacrolimus trough blood levels is a risk factor for late kidney transplant failure. Kidney Int. 2014; 8561404–1411
Janmaat CJ, van Diepen M, Tsonaka R, et al. Pitfalls of linear regression for estimating slopes over time and how to avoid them by using linear mixed-effects models. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019; 344561–566
R Core TeamR: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [computer program]. 2018Vienna, AustriaR Foundation for Statistical ComputingAvailable at https://www.R-project.org/
Rojas L, Neumann I, Herrero MJ, et al. Effect of CYP3A5*3 on kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015; 15138–48
Picard N, Bergan S, Marquet P, et al. Pharmacogenetic biomarkers predictive of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive drugs. Ther Drug Monit. 2016; 38Suppl 1S57–S69
Tron C, Lemaitre F, Verstuyft C, et al. Pharmacogenetics of membrane transporters of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019; 585593–613
Trofe-Clark J, Brennan DC, West-Thielke P, et al. Results of ASERTAA, a randomized prospective crossover pharmacogenetic study of immediate-release versus extended-release tacrolimus in African American kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018; 713315–326
Gonschior AK, Christians U, Winkler M, et al. Tacrolimus (FK506) metabolite patterns in blood from liver and kidney transplant patients. Clin Chem. 1996; 4291426–1432
Zegarska J, Hryniewiecka E, Zochowska D, et al. Tacrolimus metabolite M-III may have nephrotoxic and myelotoxic effects and increase the incidence of infections in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2016; 4851539–1542
Zegarska J, Hryniewiecka E, Zochowska D, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between concentrations of tacrolimus metabolites, 13-O-demethyl tacrolimus and 15-O-demethyl tacrolimus, and clinical and biochemical parameters in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2018; 5072235–2239
Vanhove T, de Jonge H, de Loor H, et al. Relationship between in vivo CYP3A4 activity, CYP3A5 genotype, and systemic tacrolimus metabolite/parent drug ratio in renal transplant recipients and healthy volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos. 2018; 46111507–1513
Jouve T, Rostaing L, Malvezzi P. New formulations of tacrolimus and prevention of acute and chronic rejections in adult kidney-transplant recipients. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017; 167845–855
Jouve T, Noble J, Rostaing L, et al. Tailoring tacrolimus therapy in kidney transplantation. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 116581–588

Auteurs

Thomas Jouve (T)

Nephrology, Dialysis, Apheresis and Transplantation Department, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Xavier Fonrose (X)

Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Johan Noble (J)

Nephrology, Dialysis, Apheresis and Transplantation Department, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Benedicte Janbon (B)

Nephrology, Dialysis, Apheresis and Transplantation Department, Grenoble University Hospital, France.

Gaelle Fiard (G)

Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.
Urology and Transplantation Department, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
CNRS/TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Paolo Malvezzi (P)

Nephrology, Dialysis, Apheresis and Transplantation Department, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Françoise Stanke-Labesque (F)

Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.
Pharmacology, Pharmacogenetics and Toxicology Laboratory, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
INSERM U1042, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Lionel Rostaing (L)

Nephrology, Dialysis, Apheresis and Transplantation Department, Grenoble University Hospital, France.
Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH