Does obesity impact lumbar sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after a posterior lumbar spine fusion?
Clinical outcomes
Lumbar fusion surgery
Obesity
Sagittal parameters
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
21
11
2018
accepted:
31
07
2019
revised:
13
04
2019
pubmed:
20
8
2019
medline:
12
6
2021
entrez:
18
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to compare clinical patient-reported outcomes and radiographic sagittal parameters between obese and non-obese patients following open posterior lumbar spine fusion (PLSF). A retrospective cohort study was conducted for patients who underwent open PLSF from 2011 to 2018. Patients were classified as obese as per Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines if their body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m A total of 569 patients were included; 290 (50.97%) patients with BMI < 30 (non-obese) and 279 (49.03%) patients with BMI ≥ 30 (obese). Patients classified as obese were more likely to have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System of ≥ 3 (p < 0.001). Obese patients had significantly longer operative times (p < 0.001) compared to non-obese patients. There was no difference in radiographic measurements, patient-reported outcomes, postoperative complications, or reoperations between groups. Obese patients had significantly more comorbidities and longer operative time compared to non-obese patients. However, sagittal parameters, patient-reported outcomes, inpatient complications, length of hospital stay, and reoperations were similar between groups. Given these findings, open PLSF can be considered safe and effective in obese patients after thorough consideration of related comorbidities. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31420726
doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06094-y
pii: 10.1007/s00586-019-06094-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
340-348Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15;37(11):982-8
pubmed: 22037526
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 15;33(16):1789-92
pubmed: 18628712
J Spinal Disord. 1997 Oct;10(5):376-9
pubmed: 9355052
Eur Spine J. 2016 May;25(5):1627-1633
pubmed: 26945748
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1177-89
pubmed: 24682355
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(9):772-7
pubmed: 26656059
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Apr;6(4):291-7
pubmed: 17436915
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):101-9
pubmed: 23692604
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604
pubmed: 21332281
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):878-82
pubmed: 23149493
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 1;34(5):495-500
pubmed: 19212274
Int Orthop. 2015 Jan;39(1):87-95
pubmed: 25192690
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 1;40(1):56-61
pubmed: 25526589
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 15;39(6):497-502
pubmed: 24384669
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;29(12):1504-9
pubmed: 27044219
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012 Mar;41(3):E46-50
pubmed: 22530204
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1788-97
pubmed: 27020429
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Dec 15;41(24):1933-1938
pubmed: 27275579
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:55-60
pubmed: 26724613
Int J Chronic Dis. 2016;2016:2964625
pubmed: 27478866
Spine J. 2017 May;17(5):681-688
pubmed: 27916684
Bone Joint J. 2015 Oct;97-B(10):1395-404
pubmed: 26430016
Neurosurgery. 2009 Sep;65(3):490-8; discussion 498
pubmed: 19687694
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jan 15;42(2):122-127
pubmed: 27196019
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013 Apr;24(2):157-62
pubmed: 23561554