The effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular and mitral valve geometry and secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with left bundle branch block.


Journal

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1540-8175
Titre abrégé: Echocardiography
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8511187

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 18 08 2018
revised: 29 06 2019
accepted: 07 07 2019
pubmed: 20 8 2019
medline: 27 5 2020
entrez: 20 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to define CRT effects on left ventricular (LV) and mitral valve (MV) geometry, and their correlation with MR severity. Forty-one patients with LBBB and ≥mild secondary MR underwent CRT between 2009 and 2012, and had baseline and follow-up echocardiograms available. Repeated measure and linear regression analyses were performed to assess for changes in MV and LV geometry and MR severity, and associations with follow-up MR grade. The mean age and baseline QRS duration were 65.5 ± 14.9 years and 160 ± 24 ms. At a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.8 years, there was an increase in LV ejection fraction and reductions in LV end-systolic volume index, MR grade, and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance (P < .05 for all). Linear correlations were observed between follow-up MR grade and baseline MV tenting height (r = .44), left atrial volume index (r = .41), LV end-systolic volume index (r = .4), MV tenting area (r = .38), LV ejection fraction (r = -.34), and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance (r = .34) (P < .05 for all). Multiple regression analysis revealed associations between follow-up MR grade and baseline MV tenting height (β/mm = 0.42, P = .006) and left atrial volume index (β/mL/m Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LBBB and secondary MR results in LV and MV geometric reverse remodeling and decreases MR severity. Extent of baseline MV tethering is independently associated with persistent MR at follow-up.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to define CRT effects on left ventricular (LV) and mitral valve (MV) geometry, and their correlation with MR severity.
METHODS
Forty-one patients with LBBB and ≥mild secondary MR underwent CRT between 2009 and 2012, and had baseline and follow-up echocardiograms available. Repeated measure and linear regression analyses were performed to assess for changes in MV and LV geometry and MR severity, and associations with follow-up MR grade.
RESULTS
The mean age and baseline QRS duration were 65.5 ± 14.9 years and 160 ± 24 ms. At a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.8 years, there was an increase in LV ejection fraction and reductions in LV end-systolic volume index, MR grade, and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance (P < .05 for all). Linear correlations were observed between follow-up MR grade and baseline MV tenting height (r = .44), left atrial volume index (r = .41), LV end-systolic volume index (r = .4), MV tenting area (r = .38), LV ejection fraction (r = -.34), and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance (r = .34) (P < .05 for all). Multiple regression analysis revealed associations between follow-up MR grade and baseline MV tenting height (β/mm = 0.42, P = .006) and left atrial volume index (β/mL/m
CONCLUSIONS
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LBBB and secondary MR results in LV and MV geometric reverse remodeling and decreases MR severity. Extent of baseline MV tethering is independently associated with persistent MR at follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31424113
doi: 10.1111/echo.14444
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1450-1458

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Références

Asgar AW, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure: pathophysiology, prognosis, and therapeutic considerations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1231-1248.
Trichon BH, Felker GMichael, Shaw LK, Cabell CH, O’Connor CM. Relation of frequency and severity of mitral regurgitation to survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:538-543.
Robbins JD, Maniar PB, Cotts W, et al. Prevalence and severity of functional mitral regurgitation in chronic systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:360-362.
Sannino A, Smith RL 2nd, Schiattarella GG, et al. Survival and cardiovascular outcomes of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:1130-1139.
Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001;103:1759-1764.
Silbiger JJ. Mechanistic insights into ischemic mitral regurgitation: echocardiographic and surgical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:707-719.
Kalra K, Wang Q, McIver BV, et al. Temporal changes in interpapillary muscle dynamics as an active indicator of mitral valve and left ventricular interaction in ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1867-1879.
Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Zasio MK, et al. Geometric distortions of the mitral valvular-ventricular complex in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2003;108:II116-II121.
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128:e240-e327.
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:891-975.
Ng CY, Heist EK. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: maximizing the response to biventricular pacing. Cardiol Rev. 2017;25:6-11.
Kanzaki H, Bazaz R, Schwartzman D, Dohi K, Sade LElif, Gorcsan J. A mechanism for immediate reduction in mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy: insights from mechanical activation strain mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1619-1625.
Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H, Olson S, Shafer P, Wooley CF. Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block: the effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation. 1989;79:845-853.
Onishi T, Onishi T, Marek JJ, et al. Mechanistic features associated with improvement in mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy and their relation to long-term patient outcome. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:685-693.
Felker GM, Shaw LK, O'Connor CM. A standardized definition of ischemic cardiomyopathy for use in clinical research. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:210-218.
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:252-289.
Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:303-371.
Di Biase L, Auricchio A, Mohanty P, et al. Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the severity of mitral regurgitation. Europace. 2011;13:829-838.
Abruzzo T, Tong F, Dion JE, Workman M, Cloft HJ. “Mid-term”, “Long-term”, and other terms: making sense of clinical follow-up (reply). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:6.
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1-39.
Mihos CG, Pineda AM, Santana O. Targeting the papillary muscles in mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2015;16:182-188.
Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739-2791.
Matsumoto K, Tanaka H, Okajima K, et al. Relation between left ventricular morphology and reduction in functional mitral regurgitation by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1327-1334.
Karaca O, Cakal B, Omaygenc MO, et al. Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on mitral valve geometry: a novel aspect as “reversed mitral remodeling”. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;34:1029-1040.
Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:710-718.
Sutton MG, Plappert T, Hilpisch KE, et al. Sustained reverse left ventricular structural remodeling with cardiac resynchronization at one year is a function of etiology: quantitative Doppler echocardiographic evidence from the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE). Circulation. 2006;113:266-272.
Stolfo D, Tonet E, Barbati G, et al. Acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization in dilated cardiomyopathy: effect on late mitral regurgitation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:1287-1296.
Breithardt OA, Sinha AM, Schwammenthal E, et al. Acute effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on functional mitral regurgitation in advanced systolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:765-770.
Punnoose L, Burkhoff D, Cunningham L, Horn EM. Functional mitral regurgitation: therapeutic strategies for a ventricular disease. J Card Fail. 2014;20:252-267.
Mihos CG, Capoulade R, Yucel E, et al. Mitral valve and subvalvular repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: rationale and clinical outcomes of the papillary muscle sling. Cardiol Rev. 2018;26:22-28.
Vinereanu D. Mitral regurgitation and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Echocardiography. 2008;25:1155-1166.
Spartera M, Galderisi M, Mele D, et al. Role of cardiac dyssynchrony and resynchronization therapy in functional mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:471-480.
Upadhyay GA, Chatterjee NA, Kandala J, et al. Assessing mitral regurgitation in the prediction of clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1201-1208.
Cleland J, Freemantle N, Ghio S, et al. Predicting the long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization on mortality from baseline variables and the early response: a report from the CARE-HF (Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:438-445.
Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516-2524.
Mihos CG, Yucel E, Capoulade R, et al. Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on mitral valve apparatus geometry and clinical outcomes in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation. Echocardiography. 2017;34:1561-1567.
Baumgartner H, Schima H, Kuhn P. Value and limitations of proximal jet dimensions for the quantitation of valvular regurgitation: an in vitro study using Doppler flow imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1991;4:57-66.
Mihos CG, Yucel E, Capoulade R, et al. Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy after inferior myocardial infarction on secondary mitral regurgitation and mitral valve geometry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:114-121.
Sommer A, Kronborg MB, Nørgaard BL, et al. Multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:1365-1374.

Auteurs

Christos G Mihos (CG)

Echocardiography Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Columbia University, Miami Beach, Florida.
Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Orlando Santana (O)

Echocardiography Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Columbia University, Miami Beach, Florida.

Evin Yucel (E)

Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Romain Capoulade (R)

Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Institut du Thorax, Inserm, CNRS, Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.

Gaurav A Upadhyay (GA)

The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Mary P Orencole (MP)

Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Jagmeet P Singh (JP)

Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Michael H Picard (MH)

Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH