Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis.


Journal

World journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1477-7819
Titre abrégé: World J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170544

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 20 05 2019
accepted: 13 08 2019
entrez: 21 8 2019
pubmed: 21 8 2019
medline: 8 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG type I) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy. Eligible patients from four Austrian centers were selected to conduct a retrospective analysis. All patients treated between January 2007 and October 2017 with chemotherapy according to EOX-protocol (Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, Xeloda) or chemoradiation according to CROSS-protocol (carboplatin/paclitaxel + RTX 41.4 Gy), before esophagectomy were included. Primary outcomes disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as secondary outcomes downstaging of T- or N-stage and achievement of pathological complete response pCR (ypT0N0M0) were analyzed. Data of 119 patients were included. Complete data was available in 104 patients, 53 patients in the chemoradiation group and 51 patients in the chemotherapy group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was significantly higher in the EOX group (EOX 29 ± 15.5 vs. CROSS 22 ± 8.8; p < 0.05). Median follow-up in the CROSS group was 17 months (CI 95% 8.8-25.2) and in the EOX group 37 months (CI 95% 26.5-47.5). In the chemotherapy group, the OS rate after half a year, - 1, and 3 years was 92%, 75%, and 51%. After chemoradiation, overall survival after half a year was 85 %, after 1 year 66%, and after 3 years 17%. In the EOX group DFS after ½, - 1, and 3 years was 90%, 73%, and 45%, in the chemoradiation group after half a year 81%, after 1 year 55% and after 3 years 15%. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 23% of patients after CROSS and in 10% after EOX (p < 0.000). There seem to be clear advantages for chemoradiation, concerning the major response of the primary tumor, whereas a tendency in favor for chemotherapy is seen in regards to systemic tumor control. Furthermore, the type of neoadjuvant treatment has a significant influence on the number of lymph nodes resected.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG type I) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy.
METHODS METHODS
Eligible patients from four Austrian centers were selected to conduct a retrospective analysis. All patients treated between January 2007 and October 2017 with chemotherapy according to EOX-protocol (Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, Xeloda) or chemoradiation according to CROSS-protocol (carboplatin/paclitaxel + RTX 41.4 Gy), before esophagectomy were included. Primary outcomes disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as secondary outcomes downstaging of T- or N-stage and achievement of pathological complete response pCR (ypT0N0M0) were analyzed. Data of 119 patients were included.
RESULTS RESULTS
Complete data was available in 104 patients, 53 patients in the chemoradiation group and 51 patients in the chemotherapy group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was significantly higher in the EOX group (EOX 29 ± 15.5 vs. CROSS 22 ± 8.8; p < 0.05). Median follow-up in the CROSS group was 17 months (CI 95% 8.8-25.2) and in the EOX group 37 months (CI 95% 26.5-47.5). In the chemotherapy group, the OS rate after half a year, - 1, and 3 years was 92%, 75%, and 51%. After chemoradiation, overall survival after half a year was 85 %, after 1 year 66%, and after 3 years 17%. In the EOX group DFS after ½, - 1, and 3 years was 90%, 73%, and 45%, in the chemoradiation group after half a year 81%, after 1 year 55% and after 3 years 15%. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 23% of patients after CROSS and in 10% after EOX (p < 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
There seem to be clear advantages for chemoradiation, concerning the major response of the primary tumor, whereas a tendency in favor for chemotherapy is seen in regards to systemic tumor control. Furthermore, the type of neoadjuvant treatment has a significant influence on the number of lymph nodes resected.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31426805
doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1693-6
pii: 10.1186/s12957-019-1693-6
pmc: PMC6701048
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

146

Références

Cancer. 2001 Aug 1;92(3):549-55
pubmed: 11505399
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):11-20
pubmed: 16822992
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):36-46
pubmed: 18172173
Ann Surg. 2008 Oct;248(4):549-56
pubmed: 18936567
Br J Cancer. 2009 Jun 2;100(11):1725-30
pubmed: 19436301
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1715-21
pubmed: 21444866
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):681-92
pubmed: 21684205
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84
pubmed: 22646630
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):2941-53
pubmed: 22921186
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 19;108(3):519-26
pubmed: 23322206
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3149-58
pubmed: 23800671
Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):321-38
pubmed: 24493117
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):e23-31
pubmed: 25638550
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098
pubmed: 26254683
Med Oncol. 2016 Jul;33(7):62
pubmed: 27225939
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 19;16:503
pubmed: 27435280
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1697-1708
pubmed: 27776843
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;115(7):812-820
pubmed: 28267212
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar;6(2):119-130
pubmed: 28447000
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 3;17(1):401
pubmed: 28578652
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;43(8):1572-1580
pubmed: 28666624
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):446
pubmed: 29323261
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Feb 1;32(2):null
pubmed: 30137281
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Dec;1434(1):132-138
pubmed: 30138540
Chirurg. 1987 Jan;58(1):25-32
pubmed: 3829805

Auteurs

Oliver O Koch (OO)

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. oliver.owen.koch@gmail.com.

Michael Weitzendorfer (M)

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Martin Varga (M)

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Andreas Tschoner (A)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

Richard Partl (R)

Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Alexander Perathoner (A)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Philipp Gehwolf (P)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Karin S Kapp (KS)

Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Reinhold Függer (R)

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.

Dietmar Öfner (D)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Klaus Emmanuel (K)

Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH