Baseline LV ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography after ST-elevation myocardial infarction - influence of infarct location and prognostic impact.
Anterior wall myocardial infarction
Cine
Echocardiography
Magnetic resonance imaging
ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
15
02
2019
accepted:
10
06
2019
revised:
22
05
2019
pubmed:
21
8
2019
medline:
25
3
2020
entrez:
21
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The comparability of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and 2D echocardiography (2DE) early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. In this study, LVEF measured by CMR and 2DE (Simpson's method) were compared in 221 patients after STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. 2DE image quality was systematically assessed and studies reported by an accredited examiner. Intermodality agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction or hospitalisation for heart failure. Patients were followed up for a median of 40.9 months (IQR 28.1-56). After non-anterior STEMI, LVEF measurements by 2DE (single and biplane) were consistently underestimated in comparison to CMR (CMR 55.7 ± 9.5% vs. 2DE-4CV 49 ± 8.2% (p = 0.06), 2DE-2CV 52 ± 8% (p < 0.001), 2DE-biplane 53.5 ± 7.1% (p = 0.01)). After anterior STEMI, there was no significant difference in LVEF measurements by 2DE and CMR with acceptable limits of agreement (CMR 49 ± 11% vs. 2DE-4CV 49 ± 8.2% (p = 0.8), 2DE-2CV 49 ± 9.2% (p = 0.9), 2DE-biplane 49.6 ± 8% (p = 0.5)). In total, 15% of patients experienced a MACE during follow-up. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, reduced LVEF (< 52%) as assessed by either 2DE or CMR was predictive of MACE (2DE HR = 2.57 (95% CI 1.1-6.2), p = 0.036; CMR HR = 2.51 (95% CI 1.1-5.7), p = 0.028). At baseline after non-anterior STEMI, 2D echocardiography significantly underestimated LVEF in comparison to CMR, whereas after anterior infarction, measurements were within acceptable limits of agreement. Both imaging modalities offered similar prognostic values when a reduced LVEF < 52% was applied. • After non-anterior STEMI, 2D-echocardiography significantly underestimated LVEF compared with cardiac MRI • An ejection fraction of < 52% in the acute post-infarct period by both 2D echocardiography and CMR offered similar prognostic values.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31428825
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06316-3
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06316-3
pmc: PMC6890622
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
663-671Références
Burns RJ, Gibbons RJ, Yi Q et al (2002) The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction, end-systolic volume index and infarct size to six-month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:30–36
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01711-9
Reinstadler SJ, Thiele H, Eitel I (2015) Risk stratification by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Curr Opin Cardiol 30:681–689
doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000227
Moller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK, Reeder GS, Gersh BJ, Pellikka PA (2006) Wall motion score index and ejection fraction for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 151:419–425
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.042
Reindl M, Reinstadler SJ, Tiller C et al (2018) ACEF score adapted to ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: the ACEF-STEMI score. Int J Cardiol 264:18–24
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.017
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2018) 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39:119–177
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
Chen X, Liu F, Xu H et al (2017) Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction following early and late reperfusion by coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol 228:886–889
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.146
Malik SB, Chen N, Parker RA III, Hsu JY (2017) Transthoracic echocardiography: pitfalls and limitations as delineated at cardiac CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 37:383–406
doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160105
Thomson HL, Basmadjian AJ, Rainbird AJ et al (2001) Contrast echocardiography improves the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular remodeling measurements: a prospective, randomly assigned, blinded study. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:867–875
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01416-4
Lancellotti P, Price S, Edvardsen T et al (2015) The use of echocardiography in acute cardiovascular care: recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:119–146
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu210
Thorstensen A, Dalen H, Amundsen BH, Aase SA, Stoylen A (2010) Reproducibility in echocardiographic assessment of the left ventricular global and regional function, the HUNT study. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:149–156
doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep188
Thavendiranathan P, Grant AD, Negishi T, Plana JC, Popovic ZB, Marwick TH (2013) Reproducibility of echocardiographic techniques for sequential assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: application to patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:77–84
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.035
Reindl M, Reinstadler SJ, Tiller C et al (2019) Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 29:2330–2339
Klug G, Metzler B (2013) Assessing myocardial recovery following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: short- and long-term perspectives using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 11:203–219
doi: 10.1586/erc.12.173
Guaricci AI, Carrabba N, Aquaro GD et al (2019) Advanced imaging techniques (CT and MR): gender-based diagnostic work-up in ischemic heart disease? Int J Cardiol 286:234–238
Nowosielski M, Schocke M, Mayr A et al (2009) Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:22
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-11-22
pubmed: 2717065
pmcid: 2717065
de WS, Eitel I, Desch S et al (2014) Prognosis after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a study on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus clinical routine. Trials 15:249
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-249
Reindl M, Reinstadler SJ, Feistritzer HJ et al (2017) Persistent T-wave inversion predicts myocardial damage after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 241:76–82
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.164
Reinstadler SJ, Feistritzer HJ, Klug G et al (2016) High-sensitivity troponin T for prediction of left ventricular function and infarct size one year following ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 202:188–193
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.001
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33:2551–2567
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184
Reindl M, Feistritzer HJ, Reinstadler SJ et al (2018) Thyroid-stimulating hormone and adverse left ventricular remodeling following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Apr 1:1-10
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–270
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014
pubmed: 25712077
Jenkins C, Moir S, Chan J, Rakhit D, Haluska B, Marwick TH (2009) Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: a comparison of left ventricular opacification, three-dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 30:98–106
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn484
pubmed: 18997179
Klug G, Mayr A, Schenk S et al (2012) Prognostic value at 5 years of microvascular obstruction after acute myocardial infarction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:46
doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-46
pubmed: 3461427
pmcid: 3461427
Klug G, Trieb T, Schocke M et al (2009) Quantification of regional functional improvement of infarcted myocardium after primary PTCA by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:298–304
doi: 10.1002/jmri.21498
Beek AM, Kuhl HP, Bondarenko O et al (2003) Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:895–901
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00835-0
pubmed: 12957439
pmcid: 12957439
Bondarenko O, Beek AM, Hofman MB et al (2005) Standardizing the definition of hyperenhancement in the quantitative assessment of infarct size and myocardial viability using delayed contrast-enhanced CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:481–485
doi: 10.1081/JCMR-200053623
Reinstadler SJ, Klug G, Feistritzer HJ et al (2016) Prognostic value of left ventricular global function index in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:169–176
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev129
Klug G, Reinstadler SJ, Feistritzer HJ et al (2016) Cardiac index after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction measured with phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 26:1999–2008
doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4022-7
Mistry N, Halvorsen S, Hoffmann P et al (2010) Assessment of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance imaging vs. echocardiography, contrast echocardiography, and single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:793–800
pubmed: 20525984
Solomon SD, Skali H, Anavekar NS et al (2005) Changes in ventricular size and function in patients treated with valsartan, captopril, or both after myocardial infarction. Circulation 111:3411–3419
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.508093
Nicolosi GL, Latini R, Marino P et al (1996) The prognostic value of predischarge quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements and the effects of early lisinopril treatment on left ventricular structure and function after acute myocardial infarction in the GISSI-3 trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico. Eur Heart J 17:1646–1656
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014747
Symons R, Pontone G, Schwitter J et al (2018) Long-term incremental prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a study of the collaborative registry on CMR in STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:813–825
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.023
Bodi V, Sanchis J, Nunez J et al (2009) Prognostic value of a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance assessment soon after a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:835–842
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.011
Larose E, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P et al (2010) Predicting late myocardial recovery and outcomes in the early hours of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction traditional measures compared with microvascular obstruction, salvaged myocardium, and necrosis characteristics by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:2459–2469
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.033
Popescu BA, Andrade MJ, Badano LP et al (2009) European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for training, competence, and quality improvement in echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:893–905
doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep151
Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ et al (2000) Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:477–484
doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00551-3
Saloux E, Labombarda F, Pellissier A et al (2014) Diagnostic value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurement in patients with poor acoustic windows: a comparison of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:1029–1040
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.06.006
Rechavia E, de SR, Nihoyannopoulos P, Lammertsma AA, Jones T, Maseri A (1995) Hyperdynamic performance of remote myocardium in acute infarction. Correlation between regional contractile function and myocardial perfusion. Eur Heart J 16:1845–1850
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060838
Feldman RL, Macdonald RG, Nichols WW, Conti CR, Pepine CJ (1984) Effects of acute coronary occlusion on hemodynamics in an adjacent coronary artery in dogs. Am J Cardiol 54:1103–1107
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(84)80153-8
Gascho JA, Beller GA (1987) Adverse effects of circumflex coronary artery occlusion on blood flow to remote myocardium supplied by a stenosed left anterior descending coronary artery in anesthetized open-chest dogs. Am Heart J 113:679–683
doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90706-X
pubmed: 3825857
Sheehan FH, Doerr R, Schmidt WG et al (1988) Early recovery of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: an important determinant of survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:289–300
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90397-X
pubmed: 3392324
Pellikka PA, She L, Holly TA et al (2018) Variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, gated single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. JAMA Netw Open 1:e181456
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1456
pubmed: 30646130
pmcid: 6324278
Schuster A, Hor KN, Kowallick JT, Beerbaum P, Kutty S (2016) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: concepts and clinical applications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9:e004077
doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004077
pubmed: 27009468
Khan JN, Singh A, Nazir SA, Kanagala P, Gershlick AH, McCann GP (2015) Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and tagging for the assessment of left ventricular systolic strain in acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Radiol 84:840–848
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.002
pubmed: 25743248
Doerner J, Bunck AC, Michels G, Maintz D, Baessler B (2018) Incremental value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking derived atrial and ventricular strain parameters in a comprehensive approach for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Eur J Radiol 104:120–128
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.012
pubmed: 29857857
Schmidt B, Dick A, Treutlein M et al (2017) Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle. Eur J Radiol 89:97–105
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.025
Mangion K, McComb C, Auger DA, Epstein FH, Berry C (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial strain after acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Aug;10(8)
Gavara J, Rodriguez-Palomares JF, Valente F et al (2018) Prognostic value of strain by tissue tracking cardiac magnetic resonance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:1448–1457
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.017
pubmed: 29248649
pmcid: 29248649
Eitel I, Stiermaier T, Lange T et al (2018) Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking for optimized prediction of cardiovascular events following myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:1433–1444
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.034
Mangion K, Carrick D, Carberry J et al (2019) Circumferential strain predicts major adverse cardiovascular events following an acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Radiology 290:329–337
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181253