Investigating oral fluid and exhaled breath as alternative matrices for anti-doping testing: Analysis of 521 matched samples.


Journal

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis
ISSN: 1873-264X
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Biomed Anal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8309336

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 17 06 2019
revised: 08 08 2019
accepted: 10 08 2019
pubmed: 21 8 2019
medline: 11 3 2020
entrez: 21 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current anti-doping testing is primarily conducted in urine and blood. Recently, due to confounding factors with urine and blood collections such as invasiveness, cost, and stringent shipping conditions, there has been a push for the use of alternative sample matrices to ameliorate these issues. Gaining support within the anti-doping field is the use of oral fluid, and more recently exhaled breath, as viable alternative or complementary matrices to traditional urine and blood for drug testing. Thus, we designed a first-in-field study with the purpose of investigating the utility of oral fluid and exhaled breath testing, and the preference of athlete participants, comparative to conventional anti-doping methods of urine testing. To accomplish this, 521 total matched samples, consisting of exhaled breath, oral fluid, and urine samples, were collected and analyzed, and the results compared across matrices. Participants in this study preferred the exhaled breath collection (rated 4.90 ± 0.34 out of 5, mean ± SD) over the oral fluid collection procedure (4.29 ± 0.85), and most preferred both over urine collections. Exhaled breath resulted in the shortest collection time (2.58 ± 1.00 min, mean ± SD), followed by urine (3.08 ± 1.50 min), and finally oral fluid (4.14 ± 1.94 min). Prohibited substances from the drug categories of stimulants, narcotics, cannabinoids, diuretics, glucocorticoids, beta-blockers, and others, were analyzed in this study for a comparison of testing efficacy. Of the total findings 49% were detectable in only urine, 38% in urine + oral fluid, and 9% in all three matrices. Of the unique findings 3% were detectable in only oral fluid, 1% in oral fluid + breath, and 0% of unique findings were present only in exhaled breath. The findings from this study provide a strong foundation for the future use of oral fluid and exhaled breath as viable alternative or complementary matrices for in-competition anti-doping testing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31430626
pii: S0731-7085(19)31497-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.112810
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Performance-Enhancing Substances 0

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

112810

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Geoffrey D Miller (GD)

Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: gmiller@smrtl.org.

Ryan M Van Wagoner (RM)

Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Benjamin J Bruno (BJ)

Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Jacob D Husk (JD)

Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Matthew N Fedoruk (MN)

United States Anti-Doping Agency, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.

Daniel Eichner (D)

Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH