Risk versus Benefit of Chemoprevention among Raloxifene and Tamoxifen Users with a Family History of Breast Cancer.


Journal

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1940-6215
Titre abrégé: Cancer Prev Res (Phila)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101479409

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 17 04 2019
revised: 04 06 2019
accepted: 14 08 2019
pubmed: 23 8 2019
medline: 12 9 2020
entrez: 22 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tamoxifen and raloxifene have been approved for the primary prevention of breast cancer in high-risk women, but are associated with an increased risk of serious side effects. Few studies have characterized risk-benefit profiles for chemoprevention among women who initiate tamoxifen or raloxifene outside of a clinical trial setting. Use of raloxifene and tamoxifen for chemoprevention was self-reported in 2014 to 2016 by participants in The Sister Study, a prospective cohort of women with a sister who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. After exclusions, 432 current raloxifene users and 96 current tamoxifen users were matched to 4,307 and 953 nonusers, respectively, on age and year of cohort enrollment. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate characteristics associated with chemoprevention use. Risk-benefit profiles were examined using published indices that assess the level of evidence (none, moderate, strong) that the benefits of chemoprevention outweigh the risk of serious side effects. Among current chemoprevention users, 44% of tamoxifen users and 5% of raloxifene users had no evidence of a net benefit. In analyses of factors associated with chemoprevention use, having strong evidence of benefit was a significant predictor of raloxifene use, but not of tamoxifen use. In our sample of women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer, raloxifene was more commonly used for breast cancer prevention than tamoxifen. Most raloxifene users, but <60% of tamoxifen users, were likely to benefit. Use of risk-benefit tables can help women and their healthcare providers make an informed decision about breast cancer chemoprevention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31431499
pii: 1940-6207.CAPR-19-0021
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0021
pmc: PMC6825574
mid: NIHMS1537966
doi:

Substances chimiques

Estrogen Antagonists 0
Tamoxifen 094ZI81Y45
Raloxifene Hydrochloride 4F86W47BR6

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

801-808

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA057726
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : Z01 ES044005
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : Z01 ES044005-09
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Références

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Sep 15;91(18):1541-8
pubmed: 10491430
JAMA. 2006 Jun 21;295(23):2727-41
pubmed: 16754727
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 22;103(12):951-61
pubmed: 21562243
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Dec 20;81(24):1879-86
pubmed: 2593165
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 03;107(1):354
pubmed: 25475563
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2942-62
pubmed: 23835710
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):698-708
pubmed: 24061412
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 16;90(18):1371-88
pubmed: 9747868
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010 Jun;3(6):696-706
pubmed: 20404000
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2017 Nov;10(11):609-611
pubmed: 28978567
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Dec 20;125(12):127003
pubmed: 29373861
Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):817-24
pubmed: 12243915
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Mar 7;93(5):358-66
pubmed: 11238697
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jul;134(2):875-80
pubmed: 22622807
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2327-33
pubmed: 21537036
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 Jan;65(2):125-34
pubmed: 11261828
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 23;364(25):2381-91
pubmed: 21639806
Lancet. 1998 Jul 11;352(9122):98-101
pubmed: 9672274
Lancet. 2014 Mar 22;383(9922):1041-8
pubmed: 24333009
JAMA. 1999 Jun 16;281(23):2189-97
pubmed: 10376571
Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):575-90
pubmed: 26646754
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):606.e1-606.e9
pubmed: 29630889
Lancet. 1998 Jul 11;352(9122):93-7
pubmed: 9672273
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2017 Nov;1:1-12
pubmed: 30657366
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Dec 5;99(23):1782-92
pubmed: 18042936
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Nov 3;91(21):1829-46
pubmed: 10547390

Auteurs

Chelsea Anderson (C)

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Hazel B Nichols (HB)

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. hazel.nichols@unc.edu.

Melissa House (M)

Westat, Inc., Durham, North Carolina.

Dale P Sandler (DP)

Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH