The integrated role of multiple healthy weight behaviours on overweight and obesity among adolescents: a cross-sectional study.
Adolescents
Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
Obesity
Physical Activity
Recommendations
Screen time
Sleep
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2019
22 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
05
12
2018
accepted:
17
05
2019
entrez:
24
8
2019
pubmed:
24
8
2019
medline:
27
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study contributes to the limited number of studies that have explored the impact of not meeting the recommendations for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, screen time, fruit and vegetable consumption and sleep on overweight and obesity among adolescents. A cross-sectional study of data from the 2015 Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey (OSDUHS), a provincially representative survey of students in publically funded schools in Ontario, Canada, was conducted. This study included self-reported data from students aged 11-17 years (n = 9866). The main outcome variable was overweight or obesity, classified using WHO BMI cut-points. Four independent variables for healthy weight behaviours were examined: (1) moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (≥ 60 mins vs. < 60 mins everyday over the last seven days); (2) screen time (< 2 h daily vs. ≥ 2 h daily); (3) fruit and vegetable consumption (≥ 5 times/day vs. < 5 times/day); (4) sleep (adequate based on guidelines vs. inadequate). Covariates included sex, age, Subjective Social Status (SSS), parental education and ethnicity. Binomial and multinomial logistic regression models were fitted to determine whether not meeting the recommendations for healthy weight behaviours was associated with overweight or obesity status. Only 2% of students in Ontario met the recommendations for all four healthy weight behaviours and 33% of students did not meet any of the four recommendations. In both the binomial and multinomial models, not meeting the recommendations for MVPA was the only significant healthy weight behaviour associated with both overweight and obesity (AOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.62), and solely obesity (AOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.05-1.99). Males, students with lower SSS ratings, and students with parents with an education of 'High School' or less were also at significantly greater odds of being obese. Findings from this study show that inadequate levels of MVPA is a critical behavioural predictor of obesity status in adolescents between the ages of 11-17 years, after controlling for differences in screen time, fruit and vegetable consumption, sleep, and demographics. Findings from this study could have implications toward policies and programs targeted at reducing obesity, and increasing the physical activity rates of adolescents.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study contributes to the limited number of studies that have explored the impact of not meeting the recommendations for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, screen time, fruit and vegetable consumption and sleep on overweight and obesity among adolescents.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional study of data from the 2015 Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey (OSDUHS), a provincially representative survey of students in publically funded schools in Ontario, Canada, was conducted. This study included self-reported data from students aged 11-17 years (n = 9866). The main outcome variable was overweight or obesity, classified using WHO BMI cut-points. Four independent variables for healthy weight behaviours were examined: (1) moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (≥ 60 mins vs. < 60 mins everyday over the last seven days); (2) screen time (< 2 h daily vs. ≥ 2 h daily); (3) fruit and vegetable consumption (≥ 5 times/day vs. < 5 times/day); (4) sleep (adequate based on guidelines vs. inadequate). Covariates included sex, age, Subjective Social Status (SSS), parental education and ethnicity. Binomial and multinomial logistic regression models were fitted to determine whether not meeting the recommendations for healthy weight behaviours was associated with overweight or obesity status.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Only 2% of students in Ontario met the recommendations for all four healthy weight behaviours and 33% of students did not meet any of the four recommendations. In both the binomial and multinomial models, not meeting the recommendations for MVPA was the only significant healthy weight behaviour associated with both overweight and obesity (AOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.62), and solely obesity (AOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.05-1.99). Males, students with lower SSS ratings, and students with parents with an education of 'High School' or less were also at significantly greater odds of being obese.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Findings from this study show that inadequate levels of MVPA is a critical behavioural predictor of obesity status in adolescents between the ages of 11-17 years, after controlling for differences in screen time, fruit and vegetable consumption, sleep, and demographics. Findings from this study could have implications toward policies and programs targeted at reducing obesity, and increasing the physical activity rates of adolescents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31438905
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7007-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-7007-7
pmc: PMC6704635
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1157Références
Health Rep. 2014 Jul;25(7):3-11
pubmed: 25029491
Obes Rev. 2011 Oct;12(10):781-99
pubmed: 21676153
Health Rep. 2017 Oct 18;28(10):3-7
pubmed: 29044440
Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;18(9):682-95
pubmed: 18794009
Nutrients. 2015 Dec 28;8(1):
pubmed: 26729155
Health Rep. 2009 Sep;20(3):41-52
pubmed: 19813438
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Feb;104(1):79-82
pubmed: 17450967
Health Rep. 2012 Sep;23(3):37-41
pubmed: 23061263
J Epidemiol. 2009;19(6):303-10
pubmed: 19776497
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Jul 22;6:45
pubmed: 19624822
ISRN Obes. 2014 Mar 09;2014:204540
pubmed: 24734210
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0147746
pubmed: 27557132
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Mar;99(3):314-21
pubmed: 27276743
Pediatr Int. 2012 Jun;54(3):397-401
pubmed: 22168382
Nutr Diabetes. 2014 Jun 09;4:e117
pubmed: 24911633
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):S311-27
pubmed: 27306437
Obes Rev. 2017 Feb;18 Suppl 1:7-14
pubmed: 28164448
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Jan;40(1):28-33
pubmed: 26303349
Nutr J. 2008 Jan 14;7:1
pubmed: 18194542
Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e143-50
pubmed: 20633234
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40
pubmed: 20459784
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Mar;12(3):355-60
pubmed: 24828876
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 24;6(2):e010677
pubmed: 26911589
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Sep;113(9):1165-74
pubmed: 23871104
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jul;43(7):1163-75
pubmed: 24218067
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jan 22;11:4
pubmed: 24450617
Obes Facts. 2011;4(2):105-11
pubmed: 21577017
Prev Med. 2017 Feb;95:7-13
pubmed: 27923668
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):E31
pubmed: 11483841
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483-90
pubmed: 22253364
Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766-81
pubmed: 24880830
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Oct;13(10A):1716-21
pubmed: 20883571
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Apr;158(4):385-90
pubmed: 15066880
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Nov 25;13(1):123
pubmed: 27887654
J Adolesc Health. 2004 Nov;35(5):360-7
pubmed: 15488429
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Sep;85(9):660-7
pubmed: 18026621
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Sep 21;8:98
pubmed: 21936895
Epidemiology. 2008 Nov;19(6):838-45
pubmed: 18854708
Am J Public Health. 2004 Jun;94(6):1014-8
pubmed: 15249308
Health Rep. 2008 Jun;19(2):61-76
pubmed: 18642520
Isr Med Assoc J. 2010 Oct;12(10):603-5
pubmed: 21090515
Pediatr Obes. 2012 Jun;7(3):251-8
pubmed: 22461356
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):S266-82
pubmed: 27306433